Forum index / General Chat / What Do You Want To Be...

What Do You Want To Be...

162 posts · page 6 of 6

post #151
19 November 2007, 04:41 UTC#151
2,900 post...now I hit the bed harder then .. I was going to say jesus hittin the cross, but thats taken it too far
post #152
19 November 2007, 04:41 UTC#152
I'm giving you the definition of a manuscript, not a story. Which once again, was my original argument. You haven't completed one. I'm right. You're wrong--learn to deal with it

Al, you are quite possibly the stupidest person I have ever met. And I say that without hyperbole.

ed/ thanks for postin' ahead of me sla! Ha, I don't care...
post #153
19 November 2007, 04:44 UTC#153
QUOTE(Ross @ Nov 19 2007, 12:41 AM) [snapback]451429[/snapback]

Al, you are quite possibly the stupidest person I have ever met. And I say that without hyperbole.


You just proved that I am obviously right seeing as how your scraping the bottom of the barrel for insults.

post #154
19 November 2007, 04:50 UTC#154
There's a difference between insults and opinions...unless that opinion is right--then it becomes a fact.

post #155
19 November 2007, 04:58 UTC#155
QUOTE(Ross @ Nov 19 2007, 12:50 AM) [snapback]451432[/snapback]

There's a difference between insults and opinions...unless that opinion is right--then it becomes a fact.


LOL, your really reaching huh?

Give it up man, you lost, now it's just kicking the dead horse that is "Ross is a dumbass". But I should be up for awhile and it's keeping ABV's thread up on the portal.
post #156
19 November 2007, 05:05 UTC#156
So even when you blatantly lose arguments, you just go ahead and say you won them anyway? O.K....I give up.

Happy?
post #157
19 November 2007, 05:08 UTC#157
QUOTE(Ross @ Nov 19 2007, 01:05 AM) [snapback]451438[/snapback]

So even when you blatantly lose arguments, you just go ahead and say you won them anyway? O.K....I give up.

Happy?


Last resort of the desperate man is to discredit his opposer.

Nice try but anyone that reads this will see you based your whole argument on a loose interpretation of the word "manuscript" and I did what my sig says I do to you.
post #158
19 November 2007, 05:12 UTC#158
Yeah, like people who know squat about publishing have opinions that matter anyway. I laugh at the fact that you call your 'legal pad free-hand' piece of turd anything resembling a manuscript.

If anyone else doesn't, then they obviously don't have a sense of humour.
post #159
19 November 2007, 05:16 UTC#159
QUOTE(Ross @ Nov 19 2007, 01:12 AM) [snapback]451442[/snapback]

I laugh at the fact that you call your 'legal pad free-hand' piece of turd anything resembling a manuscript.


I laugh at the fact you admit in this thread you haven't read shit of mine, but you still keep making all these fucking assumptions.

For all you know my legal pad "piece of turd" is the next Mice and Men (I know that isn't true because I read it and didn't think that at all) but you haven't. So when you say shit that is critical of my work you haven't even seen, how can I even try to listen to the rest of the bullshit that comes out of your face.
post #160
19 November 2007, 05:18 UTC#160
But you said so yourself...if it's not worth submitting, then it must be a piece of turd. Simple.

Suck my gonads....preferably the left one.
post #161
19 November 2007, 05:23 UTC#161
QUOTE(Ross @ Nov 19 2007, 01:18 AM) [snapback]451446[/snapback]

But you said so yourself...if it's not worth submitting, then it must be a piece of turd. Simple.


HAHAHHA dude, you can't justify a past statement with the information provided in retaliation by your opposer (that you are trying to prove wrong).

It's the same as shooting yourself in the foot. Yeah you got a bullet off (insult), yeah it made a hit (your foot), but it hurt yourself in the process.

Keep it up though, makes it easier to expose you as a fuck tard when you keep proving my points with your posts.
post #162
19 November 2007, 10:39 UTC#162
philosophy.