Read-only historical archive Reconstructed community archive · captured 17 November 2010

Forum index / Media & Music / Cloverfield

Cloverfield

180 posts · page 5 of 6

RyanH
post #121
24 January 2008, 22:04 UTC#121
im going to NY tomarrow night and im gonan go try wakeing up the monster
I'll be back with footage sunday
cIRca
post #122
25 January 2008, 12:33 UTC#122
I think it would be awesome if they made a proper motion picture out of this and had it filmed professional. That would make it so much more interesting to go along with this film.
iammarcmason
post #124
25 January 2008, 13:01 UTC#124
WHAT
THE
FUCK
!
cIRca
post #125
25 January 2008, 13:07 UTC#125
Shoop.
Yates
post #126
25 January 2008, 17:17 UTC#126
QUOTE(cIRca @ Jan 25 2008, 10:33 AM) [snapback]463221[/snapback]

I think it would be awesome if they made a proper motion picture out of this and had it filmed professional. That would make it so much more interesting to go along with this film.


I think that's what they plan to do with the sequel.
Funk Master Steven
post #127
25 January 2008, 17:19 UTC#127
If that did that with the first one it would have bored the shit out of me.

SD memory cards don't work like the movie made them look like they did though, my only beef with the film.

Awesome movie.
Davey Rotten
post #128
25 January 2008, 18:56 UTC#128
QUOTE(benCKa @ Jan 25 2008, 08:54 AM) [snapback]463226[/snapback]

New screenshot of the monster
External image not preserved — inspect source: http://i32.tinypic.com/6sfale.jpg

QUOTE(benCKa @ Jan 25 2008, 08:54 AM) [snapback]463226[/snapback]

New screenshot of the monster
External image not preserved — inspect source: http://i32.tinypic.com/6sfale.jpg

QUOTE(benCKa @ Jan 25 2008, 08:54 AM) [snapback]463226[/snapback]

New screenshot of the monster
External image not preserved — inspect source: http://i32.tinypic.com/6sfale.jpg

QUOTE(benCKa @ Jan 25 2008, 08:54 AM) [snapback]463226[/snapback]

New screenshot of the monster
External image not preserved — inspect source: http://i32.tinypic.com/6sfale.jpg

QUOTE(benCKa @ Jan 25 2008, 08:54 AM) [snapback]463226[/snapback]

New screenshot of the monster
External image not preserved — inspect source: http://i32.tinypic.com/6sfale.jpg

QUOTE(benCKa @ Jan 25 2008, 08:54 AM) [snapback]463226[/snapback]

New screenshot of the monster
External image not preserved — inspect source: http://i32.tinypic.com/6sfale.jpg

QUOTE(benCKa @ Jan 25 2008, 08:54 AM) [snapback]463226[/snapback]

New screenshot of the monster
External image not preserved — inspect source: http://i32.tinypic.com/6sfale.jpg

Smack Baby
post #129
25 January 2008, 19:59 UTC#129
no
cIRca
post #130
25 January 2008, 20:28 UTC#130
QUOTE(Yates @ Jan 25 2008, 06:17 PM) [snapback]463291[/snapback]

QUOTE(cIRca @ Jan 25 2008, 10:33 AM) [snapback]463221[/snapback]

I think it would be awesome if they made a proper motion picture out of this and had it filmed professional. That would make it so much more interesting to go along with this film.


I think that's what they plan to do with the sequel.

I hope. My idea.
RyanH
post #131
25 January 2008, 21:16 UTC#131
id soo tap that
Smack Baby
post #132
25 January 2008, 22:54 UTC#132
3 day ban for bencka
FhatSam
post #133
26 January 2008, 16:09 UTC#133
just watched this, I thought is was good... but shit at the same time

I wanted to see more of the monster, less of that party poo at the beginning and I'm not a big fan of the ending...

I still liked it but it anoyed me
cIRca
post #134
26 January 2008, 17:12 UTC#134
How long is it?
Ray
post #135
26 January 2008, 17:18 UTC#135
Like 73 minutes. Really short, not worth spending the money on it in the theaters. Especially with 17 of the 73 minutes being just boring footage of a party.
cIRca
post #136
26 January 2008, 17:24 UTC#136
Sounds like something I need to experience full quality though. :(
Yates
post #137
26 January 2008, 17:28 UTC#137
Yeah, a lot of my friends recommended seeing it in the theater to appreciate it fully. It's so short to help fit the story line that it was all filmed on a hand-held, thus only using one tape, battery life, etc.
Ray
post #138
26 January 2008, 17:33 UTC#138
QUOTE(Yates @ Jan 26 2008, 01:28 PM) [snapback]463435[/snapback]

Yeah, a lot of my friends recommended seeing it in the theater to appreciate it fully. It's so short to help fit the story line that it was all filmed on a hand-held, thus only using one tape, battery life, etc.


Yeah, I was glad they didn't use the light on the camera for more than a couple minutes. There would be no way that the camera could have lasted more than 15 minutes if it had been on.
cIRca
post #139
26 January 2008, 17:41 UTC#139
Unless there was an external battery for this light, but Panasonic's are shit anyway.
Yates
post #140
26 January 2008, 17:52 UTC#140
Nah son.
cIRca
post #141
26 January 2008, 21:33 UTC#141
You wanna go?
nickstatler
post #142
26 January 2008, 23:36 UTC#142
"notice how fast the joshius yatius knocked out his prey."
-steve irwin
RyanH
post #143
27 January 2008, 00:50 UTC#143
I was gonan film NY this weekend.. ended up puking at White Castle..
so we cheeled the whole time.. sucked
Yates
post #144
27 January 2008, 08:00 UTC#144
QUOTE(cIRca @ Jan 26 2008, 07:33 PM) [snapback]463472[/snapback]

You wanna go?


DVC30 WOOOOOOOT.
cIRca
post #145
27 January 2008, 08:31 UTC#145
SONY HDR-FX1.

BOOM.
Funk Master Steven
post #146
27 January 2008, 10:21 UTC#146
QUOTE(cIRca @ Jan 26 2008, 02:41 PM) [snapback]463441[/snapback]

Panasonic's are shit anyway.



QUOTE(Yates @ Jan 26 2008, 02:52 PM) [snapback]463443[/snapback]

Nah son.

Joe.
post #147
27 January 2008, 14:40 UTC#147
Was k at best, would have been so pissed if I paid money for it, but as I didn't I'll give it 5/10, but even that's just because of the hype. If I'd heard nothing would have probably walked out 10 minutes into the party.
cIRca
post #148
27 January 2008, 15:42 UTC#148
I better not think this movie is bad or I'm going to rape you all.
nickstatler
post #149
27 January 2008, 17:32 UTC#149
dibs on being first in line!