QUOTE(mono @ Oct 21 2006, 06:42 PM) [snapback]392610[/snapback]
QUOTE(Opinionated Joe @ Oct 21 2006, 04:08 PM) [snapback]392580[/snapback]
Nar don't want to get the PS3, really don't like sony's consoles, it's not original enough, it's copied Xboxlive almost to the letter, and the design is very basic and unoriginal. The games are mostly rehashes as well, if they not, then they are mostly not exclusive, so it's not really worth it in my opinion, not as a genuine nextgen console.
External image not preserved — inspect source: http://www.kotaku.com/assets/resources/2006/06/bill_gates_halo_3.jpgI dont care about the power of the PS3 or whatever, it makes fuck all difference. I don't buy a game cause the smoke blows the correct way or the cars have super shiny reflections - if it's entertaining, I'll get it.
I hate gaming press anyways, it's all biased to either side.
It's not all bias, it's based on the facts of the system or game.
The power makes a lot of difference, if that's whta they are advertising, that's there biggest feature. Xbox has live, ps3 has power, but it doesn't, that's why it's important.
And yer I really look into a game, it might not matter to a lot, but new ways of using an engine really stands out to me in a game. If they use their inititive and make something that breaks the barriers of gaming, nto just in graohics but enviroment and AI etc, it really shows they have put effort into the game, so it makes it more of a worthwhile experience, well to me anyway.
The thing with the volumentric smoke, which I exlpained and now you always cane me about, is that if I no they are willing to push the barriers, then they will definatly try to make it as entertaining as possible. If it's not original and just a rehash of old concepts and ideas, then it's not going to be as entertaining, esspecially for next gen, as you would have played them all before, may as well stick with the ps2.