Forum index / Media & Music / The ''Last Movie You Watched'' Thread

The ''Last Movie You Watched'' Thread

4,870 posts · page 115 of 163

post #3,421
15 January 2009, 21:42 UTC#3,421
QUOTE(Liam @ Jan 13 2009, 06:58 PM) [snapback]530806[/snapback]

QUOTE(bleach @ Jan 13 2009, 04:46 PM) [snapback]530795[/snapback]

The Sure Thing - Ahh classic. Cusack is, and will always be, amazing.

How many movies have you got left with your ongoing John Cusack marathon?


Since I'm trying to see all of them, I would say, a whole fucking lot. I'll see what I can get my hands on, but Bullets Over Broadway is next on the list anyway, closely followed by The Grifters and Max.
post #3,422
15 January 2009, 21:56 UTC#3,422
Missing Liam much?

I know I am. :wub:
post #3,423
15 January 2009, 22:14 UTC#3,423
The Dark Knight.

Woof.
post #3,424
15 January 2009, 23:32 UTC#3,424
Wasnt a big fan of that, maybe I was too ripped to enjoy it. Some parts were good but I think it went for too long.

Vacancy - Utter arse.
post #3,425
16 January 2009, 10:47 UTC#3,425
Ahaha. Oh Vacancy. How you tease the viewer with your fairly good premise for a story then completely fucking ruin it with plot holes and horror cliches. Such a shitty movie.

Saw III - massive downturn from the first two. You can already see the telltale signs of the series circling the drain. While some of the trademark "games" that define Saw remain quite gruesome, they don't seem as cunning or elaborate as things we've seen before, and rely solely on shock value to draw in the viewer.

You know sitcoms and cartoons always end up doing a fucking flashback clip show? That's basically the storyline of S3. It shows events from the first two movies in a lot of detail: the fate of the cop at the end of S2, how Jigsaw prepared Adam and Laurence's game in the first, how Amanda came to be the apprentice and so on. You can tell they proper ran out of ideas for an actual story, so the present-day events storyline is pathetically weak.

SPOILERS. Speaking of pathetically weak, what a shitty twist at the end. It turns out all along that the girl and the guy being tested were husband and wife. Well, golly gee gosh, I'm astounded, particularly since we saw the wife having sex with ANOTHER guy earlier on, and have a discussion with him about things not being the same between them and they wanted a divorce. This conversation makes NO SENSE - because they're not married - except as a shitty attempt to throw us off the trail of the writers' so-called "twist". We also don't care since their marriage was dead, they lived apart and hadn't spoken in weeks. So, they were husband and wife, but hardly knew each other and never talked, giving them little to no relationship and thus no point in building the entire fucking movie up to that redundant point. Nice one.

The atmosphere is non-existent. I didn't care if any of the wooden, two-dimensional characters lived or died. There's the psycho bitch who xXcuts_herself_to_see_her_soul_bleedxX, the dad who's lost everything out for revenge...seriously, the flashbacks to the original Saw were the best thing about this movie because it reminded me how awesome this idea used to be before it became a franchise. Fuck Saw III and the other eleven they're planning on making.
post #3,426
16 January 2009, 14:10 UTC#3,426
In Bruges. Fucking loved it, switched nicely between fucking funny qnd fucking dark.
post #3,427
16 January 2009, 14:15 UTC#3,427
QUOTE(Skipper @ Jan 16 2009, 02:10 PM) [snapback]531249[/snapback]

In Bruges. Fucking loved it, switched nicely between fucking funny qnd fucking dark.

On your words I will download that tonight.
post #3,428
16 January 2009, 14:24 UTC#3,428
yeah I recomend it also, great film.
post #3,429
16 January 2009, 15:00 UTC#3,429
Yep, top notch, I reccomend too!
post #3,430
16 January 2009, 16:03 UTC#3,430
It is fucking good. Loads of people just hate it without watching.
post #3,431
16 January 2009, 16:07 UTC#3,431
Looks shit.
post #3,432
16 January 2009, 16:16 UTC#3,432
QUOTE(cIRca @ Jan 16 2009, 04:03 PM) [snapback]531253[/snapback]

Loads of people just hate it without watching.


they do? shame on them.
post #3,433
16 January 2009, 16:38 UTC#3,433
yus.
post #3,434
16 January 2009, 17:27 UTC#3,434
King of California.

Was alright, nothing special. Cheers tho mike.
post #3,435
16 January 2009, 20:00 UTC#3,435
Choke, I don't think they captured the same tone of the book, but they followed the book pretty damn well so it was a good watch.

Thanks m0n

QUOTE(bleach @ Jan 15 2009, 05:42 PM) [snapback]531173[/snapback]

QUOTE(Liam @ Jan 13 2009, 06:58 PM) [snapback]530806[/snapback]

QUOTE(bleach @ Jan 13 2009, 04:46 PM) [snapback]530795[/snapback]

The Sure Thing - Ahh classic. Cusack is, and will always be, amazing.

How many movies have you got left with your ongoing John Cusack marathon?


Since I'm trying to see all of them, I would say, a whole fucking lot. I'll see what I can get my hands on, but Bullets Over Broadway is next on the list anyway, closely followed by The Grifters and Max.


Might I suggest a Christian Bale marathon next.
post #3,436
17 January 2009, 01:18 UTC#3,436
QUOTE(Funk Master Steven @ Jan 16 2009, 09:00 PM) [snapback]531300[/snapback]

QUOTE(bleach @ Jan 15 2009, 05:42 PM) [snapback]531173[/snapback]

Since I'm trying to see all of them, I would say, a whole fucking lot. I'll see what I can get my hands on, but Bullets Over Broadway is next on the list anyway, closely followed by The Grifters and Max.


Might I suggest a Christian Bale marathon next.


Christian Bale, definetely. Seen a lot of his stuff already, barely any of the older films though.


Sixteen Candles - Good movie, although not very interesting. I liked it.

How To Lose Friends & Alienate People - Haha amazing. Simon Pegg is the man.
post #3,437
17 January 2009, 02:52 UTC#3,437
QUOTE(bleach @ Jan 17 2009, 01:18 AM) [snapback]531338[/snapback]

How To Lose Friends & Alienate People - Haha amazing. Simon Pegg is the man.


I wouldnt say amazing, its a one watch wonder, pegg couldnt save that film. lol
post #3,438
17 January 2009, 03:00 UTC#3,438
taken, man it was so good.
post #3,439
17 January 2009, 04:13 UTC#3,439
Wall-E


Always enjoyed Pixar films.
post #3,441
17 January 2009, 05:23 UTC#3,441
QUOTE(Funk Master Steven @ Jan 17 2009, 12:22 AM) [snapback]531358[/snapback]

Notorious- wack


wack shit or good wack
post #3,442
17 January 2009, 05:28 UTC#3,442
Good wack?

No, there were some great scenes but so many cheesy scenes in between you forget it was bad ass just a few scenes ago.
post #3,443
17 January 2009, 05:54 UTC#3,443
I still want to check it out.
post #3,444
17 January 2009, 06:54 UTC#3,444
Oh deff, if your a biggy fan it's like halfway good.

98.9% ready to engage Pauly Shore marathon.
post #3,445
17 January 2009, 14:51 UTC#3,445
30 Days Of Night - Not bad, had it's moments and decent gore. The bit with the rock crusher machine near the end was sick as. Also proper loved the flyover shot when the vampires are overrunning the town, and you can just see chaos and shit, really effective.

One thing that got me was that the vampires seemed to be little more than fast, intelligent zombies. There wasn't much character to them, they just jumped along, pouncing on people and nomming them. The lead vampire looked like some 40 year old guy working in telesales called Jeff for crying out loud.

Was quite good though, I'd like to check out the graphic novel.
post #3,446
17 January 2009, 16:35 UTC#3,446
Role models. Good stuff.
post #3,447
17 January 2009, 17:35 UTC#3,447
Pineapple Express.
post #3,448
21 January 2009, 00:31 UTC#3,448
since sunday I watched
- eagle vs shark
- choke
- foot fist way
- fight club (prob 20th time now, luv it)
- futurama beast with a billion backs
- afro samurai complete
- and ill prob watch another movie or 2 tonight but im not sure what ones yet
post #3,450
21 January 2009, 00:39 UTC#3,450
u never seen it before??

its pretty good, I dunno I dont really know how to describe it, but since its only a 5 part mini series thing, whether you like it or not, might as well check it out