Forum index / Photoshop, Editing & Design / Why edit video at all?

Why edit video at all?

344 posts · page 9 of 12

post #241
06 March 2006, 01:32 UTC#241
Oscars are on now.
Maybe I can get the last word for an hour or two.

Video making is trial, error and practice.
Movie making is editing.
post #242
06 March 2006, 02:17 UTC#242
No you can't get the last word in, you're opinion is not valid here. And you shouldn't be watching the Oscars, it's against your religion.
post #243
06 March 2006, 08:08 UTC#243
QUOTE(mako @ Mar 5 2006, 11:44 PM) [snapback]298167[/snapback]

We dont care. Just put the hawk video, and everybody will be happy.


hes right, we just dont care
post #244
06 March 2006, 08:56 UTC#244
I whole heartledy agree with spectate, editing is stupid and a waste of time.
post #247
06 March 2006, 12:56 UTC#247
you do realised that is not agreeing with you, it is merely saying that they are far too lazy to manually edit, and prefer to let the computer do it for them. might wanna read something before you think it advocates what you say :happy:
post #248
07 March 2006, 02:21 UTC#248
QUOTE(iammarcmason @ Mar 6 2006, 05:56 AM) [snapback]298361[/snapback]

you do realised that is not agreeing with you, it is merely saying that they are far too lazy to manually edit, and prefer to let the computer do it for them. might wanna read something before you think it advocates what you say :happy:

Their "what the pros say" confirms that editing video is a colossal waste of time.

Their software "Automatic video editing" is their solution that eliminates editing.
and there are others.

Getting rid of any form of editing is a good thing.
post #251
07 March 2006, 02:53 UTC#251
God damn you and your thread that wont die.
post #252
08 March 2006, 03:05 UTC#252
It takes 3 months or more for the Hollywood crowd
to produce 100 minutes of Video. I could do that
much video in a day if I wanted to. Theirs cost
millions, my way costs pennies. Of course there is
going to be a little less quality, but it's real.
Not editing and not being so picky is what makes
the difference.
In looking at the videos, outdoors people look at
the subject, editors look at the faults.

post #253
08 March 2006, 03:09 UTC#253
shut up.
post #254
08 March 2006, 09:25 UTC#254
QUOTE(Spectate Swamp @ Mar 8 2006, 03:05 AM) [snapback]299162[/snapback]

It takes 3 months or more for the Hollywood crowd
to produce 100 minutes of Video. I could do that
much video in a day if I wanted to. Theirs cost
millions, my way costs pennies. Of course there is
going to be a little less quality, but it's real.
Not editing and not being so picky is what makes
the difference.
In looking at the videos, outdoors people look at
the subject, editors look at the faults.

First and formost I apologise for putting this back to the top of the portal but this is such shit!
Seriously Spectate Swamp, what would you rather watch, an action packed hollywood blockbuster with kickass editing and effects or some guy walking through a field filming a cow pissing?
Seriously, think about it
post #255
08 March 2006, 10:41 UTC#255
QUOTE(Spectate Swamp @ Mar 8 2006, 03:05 AM) [snapback]299162[/snapback]

It takes 3 months or more for the Hollywood crowd
to produce 100 minutes of Video. I could do that
much video in a day if I wanted to. Theirs cost
millions, my way costs pennies. Of course there is
going to be a little less quality, but it's real.
Not editing and not being so picky is what makes
the difference.
In looking at the videos, outdoors people look at
the subject, editors look at the faults.


This proves once and for all this guys a moron.

post #256
08 March 2006, 10:44 UTC#256
Haha you guys are getting so worked up... Its obviously a joke.
post #257
08 March 2006, 10:48 UTC#257
QUOTE(Word @ Mar 8 2006, 10:44 AM) [snapback]299248[/snapback]

Haha you guys are getting so worked up... Its obviously a joke.


I thought it was to at first, but he's gone out and filmed all this footage just for a joke on the internet? sad sad man.
post #258
08 March 2006, 10:52 UTC#258
Eitherways, I think hes just looking for attention... which he has found.
post #259
08 March 2006, 12:29 UTC#259
It is interesting how ones perspective changes.
If you start recording and playing music,
you become pissed at Radio for the constant interruptions.
If you start doing video you become pissed at TV and the movies.
for a whole multitude more reasons.

eg.
Hollywood like lawyers, try to take credit for all "social advancement"
in the last 100 years.
Most resent movie makers pushing their agenda. (Left or Right)

Movie makers edit, video makers shoot.

Don't get me too wrong. Granted there are a few things that do need editing.
And I have learned a few pointers, in all the discussion. Even learned a bit
more about not editing as well. The main point here is "yes you can get by
quite nicely without editing" Like anything, one needs to know a few of the tricks.
We don't have to love editing, to have fun with a camcorder and video.

I was expecting a few more "Yup he's got a point" responses.

post #260
08 March 2006, 13:28 UTC#260
Where has THC gone. Off doing unedited video maybe?
or did he get banned / edited out of this discussion.
Some private messaging going on no doubt.
post #261
08 March 2006, 16:16 UTC#261
QUOTE(Spectate Swamp @ Mar 8 2006, 01:28 PM) [snapback]299290[/snapback]

Where has THC gone. Off doing unedited video maybe?
or did he get banned / edited out of this discussion.
Some private messaging going on no doubt.

omgobvz.
post #262
08 March 2006, 16:21 UTC#262
QUOTE(Word @ Mar 8 2006, 12:44 PM) [snapback]299248[/snapback]

Haha you guys are getting so worked up... Its obviously a joke.

nah man I thought that, but check out his profile, it's got a link to his site where you can see the greatest hits of his unedited video, including Bird Buggery 2.
post #263
08 March 2006, 16:31 UTC#263
This is bullshit. I haven't been invloved in this conversation, but you know what I am going to say, I think editing makes the video better.

Take this scenario for example. Most people here film activies which they love to do, say amature stunts right? Anyone here will tell you that a well edited video of these filmed stunts beats the ass out of JUST these stunts one after another in un un-edited 'raw' video, as narly as the actual footage may be.

And that 'movie makers' 'video shooters' rubbish makes me giggle. I firmly believe producing videos is purely not just for the filming. It is a whole procss of filming, then using editing software to make your video that much better. Sure, sometimes editing may not be needed, but near-enough all times, it makes the video better. It's pure laziness not to edit. If I had the time, I would back my argument up with soem clips of edited and un-edited video, so you can see in front of your eyes what one is better. And plus, good editing is a very hard skill to aquire. It takes alot of experience with handling footage and knowing how to edit to be able to get really good at it. My point being- editing is SKILLFUL and for many young film-makers is a must to the whole process of being able to make a reasonable good clip or video.

Whatever your opinion, which is all it is; the end line is that edited video appears much better to watch than un-edited raw video. It adds another field to making videos other than shooting footage and the final product. It's a process that shouldn't be skipped.
post #264
08 March 2006, 16:32 UTC#264
if I was a mod, I would have closed this 18 pages ago.
post #265
08 March 2006, 18:24 UTC#265
QUOTE(Spectate Swamp @ Mar 8 2006, 09:28 AM) [snapback]299290[/snapback]

Where has THC gone. Off doing unedited video maybe?
or did he get banned / edited out of this discussion.
Some private messaging going on no doubt.



Common man, you cant be serious.. Image file not present in the recovered backup
post #266
08 March 2006, 18:33 UTC#266
Spectate Swamp. I will shoot something uneditted. I will do what you say is a good idea because I am open minded. However, in return you must put together a clip of all your best clips with editting and music.

Do we have an accord?
post #267
08 March 2006, 21:37 UTC#267
QUOTE(cIRca @ Mar 8 2006, 11:33 AM) [snapback]299418[/snapback]

Spectate Swamp. I will shoot something uneditted. I will do what you say is a good idea because I am open minded. However, in return you must put together a clip of all your best clips with editting and music.

Do we have an accord?

I know next to nothing about editing video.
Seems your side has the much easier task.
I could make my best 20 clips available for editing
by somebody else.

post #268
08 March 2006, 21:40 UTC#268
QUOTE(Spectate Swamp @ Mar 8 2006, 09:37 PM) [snapback]299568[/snapback]

QUOTE(cIRca @ Mar 8 2006, 11:33 AM) [snapback]299418[/snapback]

Spectate Swamp. I will shoot something uneditted. I will do what you say is a good idea because I am open minded. However, in return you must put together a clip of all your best clips with editting and music.

Do we have an accord?

I know next to nothing about editing video.
Seems your side has the much easier task.
I could make my best 20 clips available for editing
by somebody else.

Why don't you let one any single person here edit your videos together in a nice, tight video, and someone else shoot something quite impressive without using any editing at all. Then people can see both sides and both views and make up their own minds. That seems like the logical thing to do, after all arguing over thgs doesnt get anywhere.
post #269
08 March 2006, 22:46 UTC#269
QUOTE(Spectate Swamp @ Mar 8 2006, 09:37 PM) [snapback]299568[/snapback]

QUOTE(cIRca @ Mar 8 2006, 11:33 AM) [snapback]299418[/snapback]

Spectate Swamp. I will shoot something uneditted. I will do what you say is a good idea because I am open minded. However, in return you must put together a clip of all your best clips with editting and music.

Do we have an accord?

I know next to nothing about editing video.
Seems your side has the much easier task.
I could make my best 20 clips available for editing
by somebody else.

If you know next to nothing then what right do you have to tell us that what we are doing isn't good?
post #270
08 March 2006, 22:58 UTC#270
Yeah but,


QUOTE(THC @ Mar 5 2006, 07:50 PM) [snapback]297989[/snapback]

QUOTE(womp @ Mar 5 2006, 02:47 PM) [snapback]297988[/snapback]

QUOTE(Skipper @ Mar 5 2006, 07:32 PM) [snapback]297983[/snapback]

QUOTE(Wilbur @ Mar 5 2006, 07:29 PM) [snapback]297981[/snapback]

QUOTE(Ferret @ Mar 5 2006, 07:27 PM) [snapback]297980[/snapback]

QUOTE(exoh @ Mar 5 2006, 01:07 PM) [snapback]297935[/snapback]

QUOTE(neKa @ Mar 5 2006, 05:50 PM) [snapback]297925[/snapback]

QUOTE(mako @ Mar 5 2006, 05:17 PM) [snapback]297900[/snapback]

hawk