Forum index / General Chat / Britain gonna monitor every car journey.

Britain gonna monitor every car journey.

49 posts · page 1 of 2

post #1
28 December 2005, 21:38 UTC#1
QUOTE
Britain is to become the first country in the world where the movements of all vehicles on the roads are recorded. A new national surveillance system will hold the records for at least two years.

Using a network of cameras that can automatically read every passing number plate, the plan is to build a huge database of vehicle movements so that the police and security services can analyse any journey a driver has made over several years.

The network will incorporate thousands of existing CCTV cameras which are being converted to read number plates automatically night and day to provide 24/7 coverage of all motorways and main roads, as well as towns, cities, ports and petrol-station forecourts.

By next March a central database installed alongside the Police National Computer in Hendon, north London, will store the details of 35 million number-plate "reads" per day. These will include time, date and precise location, with camera sites monitored by global positioning satellites.

More: http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/ne...p?story=674001


Discuss...

Edit; link fucks up

CODE
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/story.jsp?story=674001
post #2
28 December 2005, 21:39 UTC#2
What a waste of time and money
post #3
28 December 2005, 21:40 UTC#3
I feel that's an invasion of privacy. If that goes ahead I think I might put a brick through something government like.
post #4
28 December 2005, 21:41 UTC#4
QUOTE
' date='Dec 28 2005, 09:39 PM' post='254120']
What a waste of time and money

tax payers money...my money Image file not present in the recovered backup
post #5
28 December 2005, 21:42 UTC#5
I seen a video about this kinda thing.. britain has like video cams ever where and like if you pick up the phone and call sombody and mention the word bomb your name gos on a terrorist list
post #6
28 December 2005, 21:42 UTC#6
QUOTE(nowhere @ Dec 28 2005, 10:40 PM) [snapback]254123[/snapback]

I feel that's an invasion of privacy. If that goes ahead I think I might put a brick through something government like.



It's clearly in place as the UK is verging on bankrupcy. The only thing keeping the UK going is the housing market, and that market fluctuates like a skirt in the wind. The govnerment clearly need more money and fast to finance the immigrants taking over our country.
post #7
28 December 2005, 21:45 UTC#7
thats just gay
post #8
28 December 2005, 21:46 UTC#8
The reason the immigrants were brought in was to keep this country afloat. I don't see how this idea is going to make money? Surely they're going to spend shit loads on developing the cameras and what are they gonna make from it?
post #9
28 December 2005, 21:49 UTC#9
QUOTE(nowhere @ Dec 28 2005, 10:46 PM) [snapback]254131[/snapback]

The reason the immigrants were brought in was to keep this country afloat. I don't see how this idea is going to make money? Surely they're going to spend shit loads on developing the cameras and what are they gonna make from it?



The immigrants feed from the dole, they do not constitute for even 000.2% of the countries economy. And think about it, this is existing technology. Think how many cars per day pass each camera. Think about how many speeding motorists they could track.

I'm looking at the bigger picture.
post #10
28 December 2005, 21:52 UTC#10
This is bullshit.

Fucking hate the idea that the government know everywhere I am.
post #11
28 December 2005, 21:53 UTC#11
QUOTE(Mono @ Dec 28 2005, 09:52 PM) [snapback]254142[/snapback]

This is bullshit.

Fucking hate the idea that the government know everywhere I am.

mang theyve known that for years...theyve got tracking devices in all of us...immunisations and flu jabs my arse Image file not present in the recovered backup
post #12
28 December 2005, 21:54 UTC#12
QUOTE(Mono @ Dec 28 2005, 10:52 PM) [snapback]254142[/snapback]

This is bullshit.

Fucking hate the idea that the government know everywhere I am.



That's not the problem here. The problem is this system could potentially be exploited, to be used for additional taxing, or could potentially be broken into. If the system was breached, it'd be a national disaster.

But I agree with you.
post #13
29 December 2005, 00:11 UTC#13
QUOTE(MattG @ Dec 28 2005, 09:42 PM) [snapback]254125[/snapback]

I seen a video about this kinda thing.. britain has like video cams ever where and like if you pick up the phone and call sombody and mention the word bomb your name gos on a terrorist list

And I saw a video about 4 hairy footed little fairys saving the world by burning a ring, does that mean that's true too?
post #14
29 December 2005, 00:16 UTC#14
oh just on a side not, britain isn't a country its a nation. england scotland wales and well the other one, are countries,.

anyway I don't like this, oh wait, I could use this shit without them knowing, I FUCKING LOOVE THIS IDEA!!
post #15
29 December 2005, 00:18 UTC#15
I think this is bollox and a waste of money, there is only one thing that needs to be done and by 70 years crime will be stamped out. Every child that is born take a DNA sample, soon as a crime is commited, search for DNA, compare it with the database and then the criminal is found, solves all problems. But they say that against human rights and shit. Thats a load of fucking bollocks, I rather them knowing that than what I was doing and where I was every day.
post #16
29 December 2005, 00:20 UTC#16
yeah fuck everyone, its only a lil prick anyway

EDIT::omg I just read that and it came out toally wrong!
post #17
29 December 2005, 00:25 UTC#17
QUOTE(iammarcmason @ Dec 29 2005, 01:20 AM) [snapback]254297[/snapback]

yeah fuck everyone, its only a lil prick anyway

EDIT::omg I just read that and it came out toally wrong!



Hahahahha Image file not present in the recovered backup
post #18
29 December 2005, 00:27 UTC#18
I dont think it's such a bad idea

But wouldnt it make more sense just to keep tags on just criminals? :huh:
post #19
29 December 2005, 00:29 UTC#19
QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Dec 29 2005, 12:27 AM) [snapback]254307[/snapback]

I dont think it's such a bad idea

But wouldnt it make more sense just to keep tags on just criminals? :huh:

Then again though thats unfair, my cousin was in prison for a little bit and that means they'd have full access to what he's doing, I wouldn't like it to be honest
post #20
29 December 2005, 00:31 UTC#20
QUOTE
' date='Dec 29 2005, 12:29 AM' post='254312']
QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Dec 29 2005, 12:27 AM) [snapback]254307[/snapback]

I dont think it's such a bad idea

But wouldnt it make more sense just to keep tags on just criminals? :huh:

Then again though thats unfair, my cousin was in prison for a little bit and that means they'd have full access to what he's doing, I wouldn't like it to be honest

Theyd only see where hes travelling, and for small time criminals they could put a time limit on it or something
post #21
29 December 2005, 00:32 UTC#21
QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Dec 29 2005, 12:31 AM) [snapback]254314[/snapback]

QUOTE
' date='Dec 29 2005, 12:29 AM' post='254312']
QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Dec 29 2005, 12:27 AM) [snapback]254307[/snapback]

I dont think it's such a bad idea

But wouldnt it make more sense just to keep tags on just criminals? :huh:

Then again though thats unfair, my cousin was in prison for a little bit and that means they'd have full access to what he's doing, I wouldn't like it to be honest

Theyd only see where hes travelling, and for small time criminals they could put a time limit on it or something

Like another sentance after you've already served the time? PLus that would leave people that intend to do things or have and never got caught free to roam
post #22
29 December 2005, 00:35 UTC#22
QUOTE
' date='Dec 29 2005, 12:32 AM' post='254316']
QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Dec 29 2005, 12:31 AM) [snapback]254314[/snapback]

QUOTE
' date='Dec 29 2005, 12:29 AM' post='254312']
QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Dec 29 2005, 12:27 AM) [snapback]254307[/snapback]

I dont think it's such a bad idea

But wouldnt it make more sense just to keep tags on just criminals? :huh:

Then again though thats unfair, my cousin was in prison for a little bit and that means they'd have full access to what he's doing, I wouldn't like it to be honest

Theyd only see where hes travelling, and for small time criminals they could put a time limit on it or something

Like another sentance after you've already served the time? PLus that would leave people that intend to do things or have and never got caught free to roam

Yer I guess your right about people who intend to do shit, but people still get things after they get out of jail e.g probation
post #23
29 December 2005, 00:36 UTC#23
QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Dec 29 2005, 12:35 AM) [snapback]254319[/snapback]

QUOTE
' date='Dec 29 2005, 12:32 AM' post='254316']
QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Dec 29 2005, 12:31 AM) [snapback]254314[/snapback]

QUOTE
' date='Dec 29 2005, 12:29 AM' post='254312']
QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Dec 29 2005, 12:27 AM) [snapback]254307[/snapback]

I dont think it's such a bad idea

But wouldnt it make more sense just to keep tags on just criminals? :huh:

Then again though thats unfair, my cousin was in prison for a little bit and that means they'd have full access to what he's doing, I wouldn't like it to be honest

Theyd only see where hes travelling, and for small time criminals they could put a time limit on it or something

Like another sentance after you've already served the time? PLus that would leave people that intend to do things or have and never got caught free to roam

Yer I guess your right about people who intend to do shit, but people still get things after they get out of jail e.g probation

THat's not as bad as being monitered on your everywhereabouts its as good as getting out but not actually escaping....


anyways I'm hitting the sack then going to bed, cya
post #24
29 December 2005, 00:37 UTC#24
QUOTE
' date='Dec 29 2005, 12:36 AM' post='254321']
QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Dec 29 2005, 12:35 AM) [snapback]254319[/snapback]

QUOTE
' date='Dec 29 2005, 12:32 AM' post='254316']
QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Dec 29 2005, 12:31 AM) [snapback]254314[/snapback]

QUOTE
' date='Dec 29 2005, 12:29 AM' post='254312']
QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Dec 29 2005, 12:27 AM) [snapback]254307[/snapback]

I dont think it's such a bad idea

But wouldnt it make more sense just to keep tags on just criminals? :huh:

Then again though thats unfair, my cousin was in prison for a little bit and that means they'd have full access to what he's doing, I wouldn't like it to be honest

Theyd only see where hes travelling, and for small time criminals they could put a time limit on it or something

Like another sentance after you've already served the time? PLus that would leave people that intend to do things or have and never got caught free to roam

Yer I guess your right about people who intend to do shit, but people still get things after they get out of jail e.g probation

THat's not as bad as being monitered on your everywhereabouts its as good as getting out but not actually escaping....


anyways I'm hitting the sack then going to bed, cya

Nighty night hunny :rolleyes:
post #25
29 December 2005, 00:38 UTC#25
QUOTE
' date='Dec 29 2005, 12:32 AM' post='254316']
Like another sentance after you've already served the time? PLus that would leave people that intend to do things or have and never got caught free to roam


QUOTE(Belly @ Dec 29 2005, 12:18 AM) [snapback]254293[/snapback]

I think this is bollox and a waste of money, there is only one thing that needs to be done and by 70 years crime will be stamped out. Every child that is born take a DNA sample, soon as a crime is commited, search for DNA, compare it with the database and then the criminal is found, solves all problems. But they say that against human rights and shit. Thats a load of fucking bollocks, I rather them knowing that than what I was doing and where I was every day.

post #26
29 December 2005, 01:03 UTC#26
just stick an old licence plate on the back and if you see a cop then just click a button to drop it :P
post #27
29 December 2005, 02:52 UTC#27
That's pretty fuckin gay but as long as they can't tell if I'm speeding or driving like a tit then its not so bad cause I don't plan on commiting any serious crime.
post #29
29 December 2005, 06:11 UTC#29
QUOTE(womp @ Dec 28 2005, 09:41 PM) [snapback]254124[/snapback]

QUOTE
' date='Dec 28 2005, 09:39 PM' post='254120']
What a waste of time and money

tax payers money...my money Image file not present in the recovered backup


And what exactly do you pay tax on?

QUOTE(gman @ Dec 28 2005, 09:49 PM) [snapback]254137[/snapback]

QUOTE(nowhere @ Dec 28 2005, 10:46 PM) [snapback]254131[/snapback]

The reason the immigrants were brought in was to keep this country afloat. I don't see how this idea is going to make money? Surely they're going to spend shit loads on developing the cameras and what are they gonna make from it?



The immigrants feed from the dole, they do not constitute for even 000.2% of the countries economy. And think about it, this is existing technology. Think how many cars per day pass each camera. Think about how many speeding motorists they could track.

I'm looking at the bigger picture.


This isn't just speeding motorists, this is every single moving car. I just don't like the idea at all, it's almost the same as the government knowing your every move. I can see huge protests kicking off if this goes ahead.


QUOTE(Belly @ Dec 29 2005, 12:18 AM) [snapback]254293[/snapback]

I think this is bollox and a waste of money, there is only one thing that needs to be done and by 70 years crime will be stamped out. Every child that is born take a DNA sample, soon as a crime is commited, search for DNA, compare it with the database and then the criminal is found, solves all problems. But they say that against human rights and shit. Thats a load of fucking bollocks, I rather them knowing that than what I was doing and where I was every day.


Not all crimes leave DNA.

QUOTE(RandomActsofStupidity @ Dec 29 2005, 05:35 AM) [snapback]254472[/snapback]

1984 is upon us


Sadly true.
post #30
29 December 2005, 08:42 UTC#30
QUOTE(nowhere @ Dec 29 2005, 06:11 AM) [snapback]254479[/snapback]

QUOTE(womp @ Dec 28 2005, 09:41 PM) [snapback]254124[/snapback]

tax payers money...my money Image file not present in the recovered backup


And what exactly do you pay tax on?


My Wages...especially when payroll fucks up yet again and you get emergency taxed for the 3rd month in a row Image file not present in the recovered backup