Read-only historical archive Reconstructed community archive · captured 17 November 2010

Forum index / General Chat / Like em or Not?

Like em or Not?

115 posts · page 4 of 4

Skipper
post #91
14 December 2005, 09:49 UTC#91
QUOTE(Joe. @ Dec 14 2005, 04:50 AM)
QUOTE(Belly @ Dec 14 2005, 04:45 AM)
taken from the dictionary:

"5. paedophile n. (54%)
A person who is sexually attracted to children (of either sex). Sexual activity with any children under the age of 16 is illegal. See also child abuse ; sexual offence."

sexualy activity with a child is peadophillia, loving a child isn't, my neice who is four years old, I love her because she is part of my family, she is my neice, that doesnt make me a peadophile.
[right][snapback]242863[/snapback][/right]


-phile or -phil
suff.

1. One that loves or has a strong affinity or preference for: audiophile.
2. Loving; having a strong affinity or preference for: Francophile
and pead means child. I use the word love as in sexually attracted not the same love you give a family member.
[right][snapback]242870[/snapback][/right]



ped·o·phile Audio pronunciation of "pedophile" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (pd-fl, pd-)
n.

An adult who is sexually attracted to a child or children.

The actuall definition of peadophle is An adult who is sexually attracted to a child, you cant take two words and combine there meanings. A peodphile does not love a kid, its a sick unnormall kinda fetish hting they have, they power they get from being over powering towards a kid in a sexually manner is what does it for them. Theres fuck all to do with love in it.

Where as gays are both consenuall people who do 'love' eachother, I have no problem with them aslong as they dont go for me. (I wouldnt blame them though, I am damn fine) Peodophiles rape children, scar them for life, and its illegal. Even the fact you are comparing the two is stupid.
Juvie D
post #92
14 December 2005, 09:50 UTC#92
I don't really care. I'm friends with some lesbo's. They're not any different to "normal" girls really. Cept for the incessant giggling and girl on girl action. Which I got used to pretty quickly Image file not present in the recovered backup
Doyle
post #93
14 December 2005, 10:15 UTC#93
QUOTE(K-ton @ Dec 14 2005, 08:08 AM)
Ok maybe I used the word unnatural out of context, what I ment was its not normal its not supposed to happen.  And ya there are gay monkeys out there but monkeys also drink there own piss. (no pun intended buck)
[right][snapback]242928[/snapback][/right]

Its not normal? WTF is normal. yeah I gues guys and girls are meant to have sex... and I do agree that every human is on this earth to procreat.... But nothing you can do about it if you like guys is there? All they can do I guess is kill themself.

I dont see why you have to take this "Normal" or "Unnatural" view..... Why not just say you think its sick? Thats more to your point I think.

And if it is yeah I kind of agree... Seeing a man kiss a man is sick... I cant watch I..... and the sex.... Nope not my scene. But hating them? No.... they have done nothing wrong.... I dont believe in GOD I believe in science... and if Science/Mother nature is doing this then there is a reason for it like eveyrthing.

Just because you dont understand something does not mean you have to hate it.
Wilbur
post #94
14 December 2005, 12:48 UTC#94
Gay people are cool as long as they aren't all gay in your face and act like it makes them better. Then it's just annoying as fuck.
made
post #95
14 December 2005, 12:51 UTC#95
I have no issues with gay people, its there choice.
vode
post #96
14 December 2005, 12:54 UTC#96
QUOTE(Skipper @ Dec 14 2005, 10:49 AM)
QUOTE(Joe. @ Dec 14 2005, 04:50 AM)
QUOTE(Belly @ Dec 14 2005, 04:45 AM)
taken from the dictionary:

"5. paedophile n. (54%)
A person who is sexually attracted to children (of either sex). Sexual activity with any children under the age of 16 is illegal. See also child abuse ; sexual offence."

sexualy activity with a child is peadophillia, loving a child isn't, my neice who is four years old, I love her because she is part of my family, she is my neice, that doesnt make me a peadophile.
[right][snapback]242863[/snapback][/right]


-phile or -phil
suff.

1. One that loves or has a strong affinity or preference for: audiophile.
2. Loving; having a strong affinity or preference for: Francophile
and pead means child. I use the word love as in sexually attracted not the same love you give a family member.
[right][snapback]242870[/snapback][/right]



ped·o·phile Audio pronunciation of "pedophile" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (pd-fl, pd-)
n.

An adult who is sexually attracted to a child or children.

The actuall definition of peadophle is An adult who is sexually attracted to a child, you cant take two words and combine there meanings. A peodphile does not love a kid, its a sick unnormall kinda fetish hting they have, they power they get from being over powering towards a kid in a sexually manner is what does it for them. Theres fuck all to do with love in it.

Where as gays are both consenuall people who do 'love' eachother, I have no problem with them aslong as they dont go for me. (I wouldnt blame them though, I am damn fine) Peodophiles rape children, scar them for life, and its illegal. Even the fact you are comparing the two is stupid.
[right][snapback]242962[/snapback][/right]

Thats what I was going to post. Whoever compared the two is propaganda swelled christian fuck, and dont know shit. Love between two people is way different than one abusing smaller ones.



EDIT: I forgot to , ad I love my boyos, gaz and dez.
MyK
post #97
14 December 2005, 13:58 UTC#97
w/e floats your boat
YATES
post #99
14 December 2005, 14:41 UTC#99
I don't care if a dude is gay, as long as he doesn't try to mess with me in a homo way.


Sexy lesbians/bis are hawt. Butches are eugh.
pattyt18
post #100
14 December 2005, 16:32 UTC#100
Being gay is something tha nature doesnt want, but I guess if the person doing it is OK with it, then I'm not gonna argue.
The Milkman
post #101
14 December 2005, 17:18 UTC#101
Only if the Lesbians are hot biggrin.gif
Boner Jones
post #102
14 December 2005, 17:21 UTC#102
QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Dec 14 2005, 04:32 PM)
Being gay is something tha nature doesnt want, but I guess if the person doing it is OK with it, then I'm not gonna argue.
[right][snapback]243193[/snapback][/right]


I had no idea you were the ambassator to Nature. Send him/her my regaurds.
pattyt18
post #103
14 December 2005, 17:48 UTC#103
QUOTE(Boner Jones @ Dec 14 2005, 05:21 PM)
QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Dec 14 2005, 04:32 PM)
Being gay is something tha nature doesnt want, but I guess if the person doing it is OK with it, then I'm not gonna argue.
[right][snapback]243193[/snapback][/right]


I had no idea you were the ambassator to Nature. Send him/her my regaurds.
[right][snapback]243231[/snapback][/right]

Will do biggrin.gif
joe_thc
post #104
14 December 2005, 17:49 UTC#104
Im a homophobe and im proud
grosspranksteril
post #105
14 December 2005, 17:54 UTC#105
QUOTE(Boner Jones @ Dec 14 2005, 05:21 PM)
QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Dec 14 2005, 04:32 PM)
Being gay is something tha nature doesnt want, but I guess if the person doing it is OK with it, then I'm not gonna argue.
[right][snapback]243193[/snapback][/right]


I had no idea you were the ambassator to Nature. Send him/her my regaurds.
[right][snapback]243231[/snapback][/right]

It is interesting that the people who are religious claim to speak for god and say homosexuality is wrong, or people speak for nature that do the same. If you're an adherent of religion, or of nature, and believe being gay goes against both, where do they think gay people come from?

I have noticed, via ancedote though, that those people 'proud' to be anti-gay are people that either are 'curious' themselves when drunk.
[TNowhere] Kane
post #106
14 December 2005, 17:57 UTC#106
I have no issues with gay people, I have quite a lot of gay friends and it makes no difference to their personality.



But...........Tom and Vince.


user posted image
jem
post #107
14 December 2005, 19:33 UTC#107
I really REALLY want a gay guy friend... Image file not present in the recovered backup
gman
post #108
14 December 2005, 19:49 UTC#108
Null vote.

I don't have a problem with them, but if I see any male showing affection towards each other in a sexual manner it makes me real mad, I can't see that shit. I believe everyone has the right to do whatever they want, but with homosexuals I believe they should do it behind closed doors, and certainly not in any public eye.

Edit: . I think the same about lesbians
Doyle
post #109
14 December 2005, 20:05 UTC#109
QUOTE(grosspranksteril @ Dec 14 2005, 06:54 PM)
QUOTE(Boner Jones @ Dec 14 2005, 05:21 PM)
QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Dec 14 2005, 04:32 PM)
Being gay is something tha nature doesnt want, but I guess if the person doing it is OK with it, then I'm not gonna argue.
[right][snapback]243193[/snapback][/right]


I had no idea you were the ambassator to Nature. Send him/her my regaurds.
[right][snapback]243231[/snapback][/right]

It is interesting that the people who are religious claim to speak for god and say homosexuality is wrong, or people speak for nature that do the same. If you're an adherent of religion, or of nature, and believe being gay goes against both, where do they think gay people come from?

I have noticed, via ancedote though, that those people 'proud' to be anti-gay are people that either are 'curious' themselves when drunk.
[right][snapback]243260[/snapback][/right]

lol. reminds me of someone I went to school with. always saying peoplewere gay and making fun of them... forever talking about it really. Saw him about 2 years ago.... Gay and proud now.
bordumbgirl
post #110
14 December 2005, 20:36 UTC#110
QUOTE(gman @ Dec 14 2005, 07:49 PM)
Null vote.

I don't have a problem with them, but if I see any male showing affection towards each other in a sexual manner it makes me real mad, I can't see that shit. I believe everyone has the right to do whatever they want, but with homosexuals I believe they should do it behind closed doors, and certainly not in any public eye.

Edit: . I think the same about lesbians
[right][snapback]243323[/snapback][/right]


im with Gman it doesnt make me mad just uncomfortable. but they can do what they want.
j0nes
post #111
14 December 2005, 20:41 UTC#111
Theyre ok...


I dont think they should be able to adopt kids... It's not that they wouldnt know how to take care of the kiddos its just that those kids would obviously have a tough time growing up...

I think every kid needs to have a feminal and masculin rolemodel...


Dont know... I really dont mind gay couples... I just fear that if they adopt kids the kids would get picked on and bullied for being different...


GAYPRIDE!!! BRENT&JOE GO FOR IT!! ADOPT THAT KID!!
Boner Jones
post #112
14 December 2005, 20:46 UTC#112
QUOTE(j0nes @ Dec 14 2005, 08:41 PM)
I just fear that if they adopt kids the kids would get picked on and bullied for being different...
[right][snapback]243389[/snapback][/right]


like kids don't get picked on and bullied for 10 million other reasons?!

What makes this one so different? Different enough to make you FEARZ0R it?!

And wtf is "Feminal"?
j0nes
post #113
14 December 2005, 20:52 UTC#113
I belive that "Feminal" is a synonym for "Feminine"



Well some reason are bigger than other reasons.

I feel that this could be a big reason. I dont know, I might be wrong.
Just some thoughts on this gay issue.


Shaun C-A
post #114
14 December 2005, 21:44 UTC#114
Lesbians- yes.

Gay men are just fucking gay.
[TNowhere] Kane
post #115
14 December 2005, 23:34 UTC#115
I know about a study that was conducted to see how much homophobic men were aroused when watching gay porn.

Homophobic men - 80% aroused whilst watching gay porn.
Control group (No sexual orientation opinion) - 30% aroused.

Unlucky Shaun ;)