Read-only historical archive Reconstructed community archive · captured 17 November 2010

Forum index / General Chat / Like em or Not?

Like em or Not?

115 posts · page 3 of 4

Joe.
post #61
14 December 2005, 04:28 UTC#61
No I mean love as in sexually love thats what a peado is. This is really going nowhere, my opinion is that gays are wrong because they love something unnatural, peados are wrong becuase they love something unnatural. Thats it, it may be wrong but its my opinion and what I believe.
Doyle
post #62
14 December 2005, 04:29 UTC#62
But what people do not understand is that you say they are the same. Thats what people do NOT understand.
Joe.
post #63
14 December 2005, 04:31 UTC#63
QUOTE(Doyle @ Dec 14 2005, 04:29 AM)
But what people do not understand is that you say they are the same. Thats what people do NOT understand.
[right][snapback]242846[/snapback][/right]

I never said they were completly the same, obviously a peado does a lot more harm both physically and physcologically, but to me they both run along the same concept of loving unnaturally.
Doyle
post #64
14 December 2005, 04:34 UTC#64
See you use taht word again "Love" pedos "DO NOT LOVE".

So there not the same
Joe.
post #65
14 December 2005, 04:35 UTC#65
QUOTE(Doyle @ Dec 14 2005, 04:34 AM)
See you use taht word again "Love" pedos "DO NOT LOVE".

So there not the same
[right][snapback]242850[/snapback][/right]

Please look up the word peadophille, sorry I don't mean to be patronising, but the word itself mean child love.
Belly
post #66
14 December 2005, 04:36 UTC#66
If you loved somebody, would you rape them?
Joe.
post #67
14 December 2005, 04:39 UTC#67
QUOTE(Belly @ Dec 14 2005, 04:36 AM)
If you loved somebody, would you rape them?
[right][snapback]242854[/snapback][/right]

Some/most peadophilles don't have sex with the child unless they let them. Its filthly wrong, as the child doesn't no what he's allowing himself to do, but in their eyes they see it as consenting sex. Fucked up but is how they see it.
Belly
post #68
14 December 2005, 04:40 UTC#68
what about the ones that molest 2 year olds
Joe.
post #69
14 December 2005, 04:41 UTC#69
QUOTE(Belly @ Dec 14 2005, 04:40 AM)
what about the ones that molest 2 year olds
[right][snapback]242859[/snapback][/right]

Then thats even more fucked up, but you no if they don't properly love them, and just want to rape and abuse then its not true peadophillia, its just fucked up.
Doyle
post #70
14 December 2005, 04:42 UTC#70
Oh man . I truly do hope oneday you get raped man. Then tehy can say they love you. See what you think about it.

you have no fucking clue what your talking about. "Some/most peadophilles don't have sex with the child unless they let them"

Your are truly retarded. If a man raped my kid then said he loved her... and I should look at him in the same light as being gay... Would I think "He has a point there" Maybe he did love my kid....

your a dumb shit
Belly
post #71
14 December 2005, 04:45 UTC#71
taken from the dictionary:

"5. paedophile n. (54%)
A person who is sexually attracted to children (of either sex). Sexual activity with any children under the age of 16 is illegal. See also child abuse ; sexual offence."

sexualy activity with a child is peadophillia, loving a child isn't, my neice who is four years old, I love her because she is part of my family, she is my neice, that doesnt make me a peadophile.
Joe.
post #72
14 December 2005, 04:48 UTC#72
QUOTE(Doyle @ Dec 14 2005, 04:42 AM)
Oh man . I truly do hope oneday you get raped man. Then tehy can say they love you. See what you think about it.

you have no fucking clue what your talking about. "Some/most peadophilles don't have sex with the child unless they let them"

Your are truly retarded. If a man raped my kid then said he loved her... and I should look at him in the same light as being gay... Would I think "He has a point there" Maybe he did love my kid....

your a dumb shit
[right][snapback]242861[/snapback][/right]

you really are missinturpeting my point. Yer im not saying peadophilla is right, im not saying its good to do and im not saying there the same as gays.
They have similarites in my eyes, and I see both of them as wrong becuase of this. I don't mean to come across how you think I did, I DONT LIKE PEADOPHILLES I think their fucked up, I dispise them, its because I feel peados love something which is wrong and fucked, and I think gays love something that is wrong and fucked, which is why I place the two together. To make it clear peados are clearly worse than gays, because of the very nature of the thing they love, but I feel the whole concept of loving something unnatural is apparent between both gays and peados which is why I don't agree with either one of them.
Joe.
post #73
14 December 2005, 04:50 UTC#73
QUOTE(Belly @ Dec 14 2005, 04:45 AM)
taken from the dictionary:

"5. paedophile n. (54%)
A person who is sexually attracted to children (of either sex). Sexual activity with any children under the age of 16 is illegal. See also child abuse ; sexual offence."

sexualy activity with a child is peadophillia, loving a child isn't, my neice who is four years old, I love her because she is part of my family, she is my neice, that doesnt make me a peadophile.
[right][snapback]242863[/snapback][/right]


-phile or -phil
suff.

1. One that loves or has a strong affinity or preference for: audiophile.
2. Loving; having a strong affinity or preference for: Francophile
and pead means child. I use the word love as in sexually attracted not the same love you give a family member.
Belly
post #74
14 December 2005, 04:51 UTC#74
QUOTE(Joe. @ Dec 14 2005, 04:48 AM)
QUOTE(Doyle @ Dec 14 2005, 04:42 AM)
Oh man . I truly do hope oneday you get raped man. Then tehy can say they love you. See what you think about it.

you have no fucking clue what your talking about. "Some/most peadophilles don't have sex with the child unless they let them"

Your are truly retarded. If a man raped my kid then said he loved her... and I should look at him in the same light as being gay... Would I think "He has a point there" Maybe he did love my kid....

your a dumb shit
[right][snapback]242861[/snapback][/right]

you really are missinturpeting my point. Yer im not saying peadophilla is right, im not saying its good to do and im not saying there the same as gays.
They have similarites in my eyes, and I see both of them as wrong becuase of this. I don't mean to come across how you think I did, I DONT LIKE PEADOPHILLES I think their fucked up, I dispise them, its because I feel peados love something which is wrong and fucked, and I think gays love something that is wrong and fucked, which is why I place the two together. To make it clear peados are clearly worse than gays, because of the very nature of the thing they love, but I feel the whole concept of loving something unnatural is apparent between both gays and peados which is why I don't agree with either one of them.
[right][snapback]242869[/snapback][/right]



well I understand that a bit better I guess, still think its a dodgy comparison though.
Doyle
post #75
14 December 2005, 04:51 UTC#75
I understand your points... I have from the start. I think you are really wrong.

Looking at someone who just likes a different sex and then someone who lieks kids is not the same at all.

This is why I think you are dumb. This is why your views are retarded.

Its like saying someone who kills cows for food isthe same as a killer who kills humans for fun.

Its just retarded

And who gives a shit what a name is translated too. It still does not mean its right. or trnslated right
Joe.
post #76
14 December 2005, 04:54 UTC#76
QUOTE(Doyle @ Dec 14 2005, 04:51 AM)
I understand your points... I have from the start. I think you are really wrong.

Looking at someone who just likes a different sex and then someone who lieks kids is not the same at all.

This is why I think you are dumb. This is why your views are retarded.

Its like saying someone who kills cows for food isthe same as a killer who kills humans for fun.

Its just retarded

And who gives a shit what a name is translated too. It still does not mean its right. or trnslated right
[right][snapback]242872[/snapback][/right]

Nar there too different to compare, for me it's like killing a human and mutalating and torturing a human. Both wrong, but one is a lot lot more wrong. Gay being the first and peadophillia being the latter
Doyle
post #77
14 December 2005, 04:56 UTC#77
So being gay is worse then being a pedo?
Joe.
post #78
14 December 2005, 04:57 UTC#78
QUOTE(Doyle @ Dec 14 2005, 04:56 AM)
So being gay is worse then being a pedo?
[right][snapback]242875[/snapback][/right]

Nar other way round man first one is killing (gay) latter is torture and mutalating(paedo)
Doyle
post #79
14 December 2005, 04:59 UTC#79
You really are retarded. How old are you?
Joe.
post #80
14 December 2005, 05:00 UTC#80
QUOTE(Doyle @ Dec 14 2005, 04:59 AM)
You really are retarded. How old are you?
[right][snapback]242878[/snapback][/right]

Im 16 nearly 17, and you can't say im retarded for having my views, they make sense on a basic logical level, and thats how I work.
Jonneh
post #81
14 December 2005, 05:22 UTC#81
this is a stupid thread.
WEAK
post #82
14 December 2005, 05:27 UTC#82
both my brother and uncle are gay. I dont have any problem with gays at all, but the thought of 2 guys going at it does make me wanna puke.
Doyle
post #83
14 December 2005, 05:48 UTC#83
QUOTE(WEAK @ Dec 14 2005, 06:27 AM)
both my brother and uncle are gay. I dont have any problem with gays at all, but the thought of 2 guys going at it does make me wanna puke.
[right][snapback]242901[/snapback][/right]

yeah thats the only prob I have. I said before about my friends bro being gay... well my friend shared a flat with him after he came out about being gay. Well my friend had to sleep in the next room while he had his bf and him going at it... in the end he had to move out....
K-ton
post #84
14 December 2005, 05:51 UTC#84
First off I want to say that I have no problem with gays if one of my friends came out to me I wouldn't look at them any differently then I do now. But I do believe being gay is wrong and unnatural, think about it every human, in fact every animal in this world is here for one purpose and thats to reproduce. So if your gay you really can't serve this purpose now can you?
BuckWild
post #85
14 December 2005, 06:47 UTC#85
this guy is truly a moron, his point of view makes him sound like a religious freak! I can't believe what I'm hearing out of this guy, its everything that is wrong with the world!

there are shades of grey in this world between right and wrong, and having sex between two consenting adults is one of those areas that don't have anything to do with you personally. Someone "attacking" which is what happens when someone has sex with a child, it's attacking them physically cause they can't defend themselves in anyway so yeah it's not the same at all. not even close and have nothing to do with eachother

two men or women having sex is the same as me saying I'll punch you in the face and you telling me it's ok, me asking a 3 year old if I can punch them in the face and them telling me it's ok is fucked up
BuckWild
post #86
14 December 2005, 06:52 UTC#86
QUOTE(K-ton @ Dec 14 2005, 05:51 AM)
First off I want to say that I have no problem with gays if one of my friends came out to me I wouldn't look at them any differently then I do now.  But I do believe being gay is wrong and unnatural, think about it every human, in fact every animal in this world is here for one purpose and thats to reproduce.  So if your gay you really can't serve this purpose now can you?
[right][snapback]242912[/snapback][/right]


the world is over populated, don't get me wrong its fucknig gross, but so is smoking and I don't want anyone telling me I can't smoke
dgodlewski
post #87
14 December 2005, 07:04 UTC#87
QUOTE(Joe. @ Dec 14 2005, 04:13 AM)
QUOTE(Belly @ Dec 14 2005, 03:09 AM)
yeah but I dont get how you can compare the to, being a peadophile is wrong and disgusting man, they do stuff to kids, tiny kids. there too young to even realise what happening it ruins them for life.

Being a gay, I dont see porblems with that, if both people are willing I see nothing wrong. And not all people choose to be gay, I know a few people who are attraced to men and not women, and they dont even want to be that way, but its just the way they are.
[right][snapback]242758[/snapback][/right]

Yer I know there widely different but its the concept thats there which is similar. Yer I do feel for those who can't help it, but im still against it, society accepts gays and paints them as comic funny great people, I.e Will and Grace, and now being gays just normal and fine, but its still unnatural. People become gay more than ever because we give it such a good name.
[right][snapback]242761[/snapback][/right]


I think they are just fine, research has proven its in your genetics, just the same as down syndrome, do you disown people with downs syndrome? nope.
Why the fuck would someone chose to be gay in this day and age where there is so much hate?

As for it being unnatural....National Geographic has publicly admitted to taking out scenes of homosexual acts between animals which happens on a regular basis, based on the fact that conservative financial backers would cut the money coming in if they broadcasted it. I will look up the link and post it, its from TIME magazine. IT don’t get anymore fucking natural then National Geographic.

EDIT:
This isnt the exact link, but it pretty much sums up the "natural" point: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/20..._gayanimal.html
K-ton
post #88
14 December 2005, 07:08 UTC#88
Ok maybe I used the word unnatural out of context, what I ment was its not normal its not supposed to happen. And ya there are gay monkeys out there but monkeys also drink there own piss. (no pun intended buck)
dgodlewski
post #89
14 December 2005, 07:18 UTC#89
QUOTE(K-ton @ Dec 14 2005, 08:08 AM)
  And ya tere are gay monkeys out there but monkeys also drink there own piss. (no pun intended buck)
[right][snapback]242928[/snapback][/right]


So do people with kinky fetishis.... your point?
broken silence
post #90
14 December 2005, 09:42 UTC#90
Girl on Girl is fine, Guys is just wrong.