post #211
18 December 2005, 12:30 UTC#211
Fair enough.
Forum index / Photoshop, Editing & Design / [HGF Photoshop Mural]
[HGF Photoshop Mural]
281 posts · page 8 of 10
post #212
18 December 2005, 12:33 UTC#212
QUOTE(The Milkman @ Dec 18 2005, 02:29 PM)
External image not preserved — inspect source: http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/2817/piece18jh.jpg
External image not preserved — inspect source: http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/549/shit3hocopy6cz3uz.jpg
If I can be in it thats what I'll put in^^
If not then just say ' Image file not present in the recovered backup '
[right][snapback]246427[/snapback][/right]
External image not preserved — inspect source: http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/549/shit3hocopy6cz3uz.jpg
If I can be in it thats what I'll put in^^
If not then just say ' Image file not present in the recovered backup '
[right][snapback]246427[/snapback][/right]
MY EYEEEEES! THEY HURT!
post #213
18 December 2005, 12:39 UTC#213
Image file not present in the recovered backup
You're all so hurtful Image file not present in the recovered backup
You're all so hurtful Image file not present in the recovered backup
post #214
18 December 2005, 12:42 UTC#214
Sorry dude, that peice ruins the other one, plus I dont think its up to the standereds of the other peices
post #215
18 December 2005, 12:44 UTC#215
I like the peice dont get me wrong I think that maybe putting it next to leif's was a bad idea tho
post #216
18 December 2005, 12:45 UTC#216
QUOTE(DEX @ Dec 18 2005, 12:42 PM)
Sorry dude, that peice ruins the other one, plus I dont think its up to the standereds of the other peices
[right][snapback]246438[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]246438[/snapback][/right]
QUOTE(womp @ Dec 18 2005, 12:44 PM)
I like the peice dont get me wrong I think that maybe putting it next to leif's was a bad idea tho
[right][snapback]246441[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]246441[/snapback][/right]
Thats fair enough guys. Thanks anyways.
I needed something to do to kill time... and I thought I'd be really cool but now I'm just covered in faeces.
post #217
18 December 2005, 12:47 UTC#217
QUOTE(The Milkman @ Dec 18 2005, 01:45 PM)
QUOTE(DEX @ Dec 18 2005, 12:42 PM)
Sorry dude, that peice ruins the other one, plus I dont think its up to the standereds of the other peices
[right][snapback]246438[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]246438[/snapback][/right]
QUOTE(womp @ Dec 18 2005, 12:44 PM)
I like the peice dont get me wrong I think that maybe putting it next to leif's was a bad idea tho
[right][snapback]246441[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]246441[/snapback][/right]
Thats fair enough guys. Thanks anyways.
I needed something to do to kill time... and I thought I'd be really cool but now I'm just covered in faeces.
[right][snapback]246442[/snapback][/right]
Im gunna stick up for mr milky here and say that I like your piece..And it doesent look bad at all in the mural. Infact I like it more than skippers piece I just think it needs some text added
post #218
18 December 2005, 12:49 UTC#218
I never said I didnt like the peice...and I never said that it shouldnt be in the mural...I just think that maybe it shouldnt be next to leif's peice
post #219
18 December 2005, 12:50 UTC#219
QUOTE(womp @ Dec 18 2005, 01:49 PM)
I never said I didnt like the peice...and I never said that it shouldnt be in the mural...I just think that maybe it shouldnt be next to leif's peice
[right][snapback]246444[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]246444[/snapback][/right]
Why not...I think its well blended from liefs to Toms piece
post #220
18 December 2005, 12:52 UTC#220
I dunno I just think that because the far left of skippers piece is already yellowy then it might look better...I dunno just imo
post #221
18 December 2005, 12:53 UTC#221
QUOTE(womp @ Dec 18 2005, 01:52 PM)
I dunno I just think that because the far left of skippers piece is already yellowy then it might look better...I dunno just imo
[right][snapback]246447[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]246447[/snapback][/right]
Ah I see what you meen now...I do agree with you there...As Liefs and Toms are very diffrent colour wise
Tom put yours next to skippy mc skipsons and see how it looks
post #222
18 December 2005, 13:04 UTC#222
looking hot
post #223
18 December 2005, 13:16 UTC#223
But the milkmans pic is just like a pic all blurred?
We dont want the murial to be let down?
We dont want the murial to be let down?
post #224
18 December 2005, 13:46 UTC#224
So.... whats happening?
I assumed if its 150 pixel overlap then surely Leifs piece needs to be blended there anyway... unless it was supposed to the be end piece on the right hand side.
I assumed if its 150 pixel overlap then surely Leifs piece needs to be blended there anyway... unless it was supposed to the be end piece on the right hand side.
post #225
18 December 2005, 13:47 UTC#225
I agree with Dex.. its just a blured pic..
No Offence but if yours goes up, alot of other peoples should too.
No Offence but if yours goes up, alot of other peoples should too.
post #226
18 December 2005, 13:49 UTC#226
Do you just mean your piece?
post #227
18 December 2005, 13:50 UTC#227
No Joe is getting pretty good at PS and im sure he could throw a piece together..
post #228
18 December 2005, 13:55 UTC#228
QUOTE(broken silence @ Dec 18 2005, 08:50 AM)
No Joe is getting pretty good at PS and im sure he could throw a piece together..
[right][snapback]246481[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]246481[/snapback][/right]
he doesnt belong in the ranks of the others... pfft...
post #229
18 December 2005, 14:12 UTC#229
Lol point is it should remain for those who started it..
post #230
18 December 2005, 14:34 UTC#230
how do you guys feather the pics togeather?
post #231
18 December 2005, 15:09 UTC#231
select the marquee tool , select a decent feather amount and delete the layer on top , then it just blends
post #232
18 December 2005, 15:12 UTC#232
QUOTE(tomm @ Dec 18 2005, 10:09 AM)
select the marquee tool , select a decent feather amount and delete the layer on top , then it just blends
[right][snapback]246534[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]246534[/snapback][/right]
well that made 0 sense.. what r the hot keys?
post #233
18 December 2005, 15:17 UTC#233
QUOTE(THC @ Dec 18 2005, 03:12 PM)
QUOTE(tomm @ Dec 18 2005, 10:09 AM)
select the marquee tool , select a decent feather amount and delete the layer on top , then it just blends
[right][snapback]246534[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]246534[/snapback][/right]
well that made 0 sense.. what r the hot keys?
[right][snapback]246536[/snapback][/right]
one fo the reasons I take so long in photoshop is because I know shit all keyboard shortcutrs
so dont ask me
post #234
18 December 2005, 15:18 UTC#234
Thanks for the comments guys. Glad you liked it.
post #235
19 December 2005, 01:11 UTC#235
Sorry to say this guys, but I just dont have the time for this. G knows at the moment I got alot of shit to do, im really busy. Its even stopped me coming on here. I think I got a couple more days of this to come as well. I aint quitting as Admin or anything, I just wont be able to get a mural piece done. Sorry guy. Image file not present in the recovered backup
And Tom (Milkman) your piece is a picture blured. Sorry to say, but it doesnt deserve to even be in this thread. Image file not present in the recovered backup <3
And Tom (Milkman) your piece is a picture blured. Sorry to say, but it doesnt deserve to even be in this thread. Image file not present in the recovered backup <3
post #236
19 December 2005, 01:35 UTC#236
Damn you MADE. Image file not present in the recovered backup
I was looking forward in seeing your piece as well.
I was looking forward in seeing your piece as well.
post #237
19 December 2005, 01:38 UTC#237
Im sorry man. If this is still going in a few days then il try contribute. But for now, I get a few minutes spare at a time. So there is no way im getting anything sorted in that time. Sorry guys.
post #238
19 December 2005, 21:45 UTC#238
whos turn now then?
post #239
19 December 2005, 21:46 UTC#239
QUOTE(MADE @ Dec 19 2005, 01:11 AM)
And Tom (Milkman) your piece is a picture blured. Sorry to say, but it doesnt deserve to even be in this thread. Image file not present in the recovered backup <3
[right][snapback]247209[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]247209[/snapback][/right]
I only said if people think it looks good then let it in.
Its not like I put loads of effort in...
post #240
19 December 2005, 21:53 UTC#240
Word then Adem? That right?