post #38,071
13 January 2009, 21:14 UTC#38,071
You moved on to stalking Kane instead of Mike now lol? Never thought I'd see the day.
Forum index / General Chat / Tell HGF Things
Tell HGF Things
47,061 posts · page 1,270 of 1,569
post #38,072
13 January 2009, 21:18 UTC#38,072
ooh no you got it all wrong, I actually have a ton of vids I plan on making that have to do with my "obsession" of mono, its just since its winter I havent been able to do so, cant go filmin outside, its 2 cold out Image file not present in the recovered backup but beleive me, ill be steppin over the line again soon Image file not present in the recovered backup
and im not even going to acknowledge the comment towards kane.
but I can still stay with you and liam next tuesday right??
and im not even going to acknowledge the comment towards kane.
but I can still stay with you and liam next tuesday right??
post #38,073
13 January 2009, 21:19 UTC#38,073
yeah SEE YOU NEXT TUESDAY.
post #38,074
13 January 2009, 21:19 UTC#38,074
Nah. sorry.
You've changed.
You've changed.
post #38,075
13 January 2009, 21:20 UTC#38,075
ill win yur heart once again made.
newquay 2012 yuss!!!
newquay 2012 yuss!!!
post #38,076
13 January 2009, 21:23 UTC#38,076
Mate you're so fucking weird.
post #38,077
13 January 2009, 21:24 UTC#38,077
But maybe to him, we are the ones who are disabled.
post #38,078
13 January 2009, 21:25 UTC#38,078
hahahaha. and im being serious too
External image not preserved — inspect source: http://www.mattresspolice.com/images/sarcasm.jpg
External image not preserved — inspect source: http://www.mattresspolice.com/images/sarcasm.jpg
post #38,079
13 January 2009, 21:28 UTC#38,079
learn to sarcasm.
post #38,080
13 January 2009, 21:29 UTC#38,080
im a robot I dont have human emotions
post #38,081
13 January 2009, 21:30 UTC#38,081
yeah, how is you being a creepy internet stalker guy, sarcasm? also, how is sarcasm an emotion?
post #38,082
13 January 2009, 21:32 UTC#38,082
yeah I dont know, but what ever
post #38,083
13 January 2009, 21:38 UTC#38,083
You're just weird. Don't come here.
post #38,084
13 January 2009, 21:39 UTC#38,084
lol.
post #38,085
13 January 2009, 22:19 UTC#38,085
pff, im so going to the uk. first stop leeds
post #38,086
13 January 2009, 22:21 UTC#38,086
and last stop, leeds, wraped in plastic, in mades attic.
post #38,087
post #38,088
13 January 2009, 22:45 UTC#38,088
need the actual 4chan thread tho. they wont start a new one 
post #38,089
13 January 2009, 23:08 UTC#38,089
I want to see the pic.
post #38,090
13 January 2009, 23:32 UTC#38,090
Dude, what's the fuckin deal with this? Threads deleted for no reason, starting shit with Slavin to avoid talking about whatever happyjack did.
SOMEBODY EXPLAIN
SOMEBODY EXPLAIN
post #38,091
13 January 2009, 23:39 UTC#38,091
Its all Liams fault.
post #38,092
13 January 2009, 23:46 UTC#38,092
Happy jack spit roasted some bitch and she sent the video to her b/f and the b/f tried to get /b/ to army happy jack, chick, and other guy fucking chick.
/b/ turned on him and posted all his info on the page.
/b/ turned on him and posted all his info on the page.
post #38,093
13 January 2009, 23:50 UTC#38,093
And then Slavin posted the link here, it went 404'd and instead of keeping a log of the events surrounding the vids, like finding caps or the video itself somebody decided to delete the thread?
post #38,094
14 January 2009, 01:42 UTC#38,094
Basically if someone had capped everything then fair enough, but the fact is Slavin, Kane and I think Mason were the only people that saw anything in the thread. So it was pointless. If anyone has caps or wants to post the stuff here fine, do it. But basically pics or it didnt happen.
So yeah, posting a link to /b/ is pointless as the thread will 404 before people see it.
So yeah, posting a link to /b/ is pointless as the thread will 404 before people see it.
post #38,095
14 January 2009, 01:49 UTC#38,095
I had like one cap, couldn't be arsed to cap all the /b/tards.
post #38,096
14 January 2009, 01:50 UTC#38,096
QUOTE(made @ Jan 14 2009, 01:42 AM) [snapback]530922[/snapback]
Basically if someone had capped everything then fair enough, but the fact is Slavin, Kane and I think Mason were the only people that saw anything in the thread. So it was pointless. If anyone has caps or wants to post the stuff here fine, do it. But basically pics or it didnt happen.
So yeah, posting a link to /b/ is pointless as the thread will 404 before people see it.
post #38,097
14 January 2009, 06:13 UTC#38,097
I agree with liam and made
on anthor note. starbord night at the bar, celebrated a mates 19th. pretty hamm-didly (flanders reference) and yeah, thats it
on anthor note. starbord night at the bar, celebrated a mates 19th. pretty hamm-didly (flanders reference) and yeah, thats it
post #38,098
14 January 2009, 09:47 UTC#38,098
Dunno how true this is.........
BEST LAWYER STORY OF THE YEAR,
Charlotte, North Carolina. USA .
A lawyer purchased a box of very rare and expensive cigars, then insured them against, among other things, fire.
Within a month, having smoked his entire stockpile of these great cigars and without yet having made even his first premium payment on the policy, the lawyer filed a claim against the insurance company.
In his claim, the lawyer stated the cigars were lost 'in a series of small fires.'
The insurance company refused to pay, citing the obvious reason, that the man had consumed the cigars in the normal fashion.
The lawyer sued.. and WON!
(Stay with me.)
Delivering the ruling, the judge agreed with the insurance company that the claim was frivolous. The judge stated nevertheless, that the lawyer held a policy from the company, which it had warranted that the cigars were insurable and also guaranteed that it would insure them against fire, without defining what is considered to be unacceptable fire' and was obligated to pay the claim!
Rather than endure lengthy and costly appeal process, the insurance company accepted the ruling and paid $15,000 to the lawyer for his loss of the cigars lost in the 'fires'.
NOW, FOR THE BEST PART
After the lawyer cashed the check, the insurance company had him arrested on 24 counts of ARSON!!!
With his own insurance claim and testimony from the previous case being used against him, the lawyer was convicted of intentionally burning his insured property and was sentenced to 24 months in jail and a $24,000 fine.
This is a true story and was the First Place winner in the recent Criminal Lawyers Award Contest!
QUOTE
BEST LAWYER STORY OF THE YEAR,
Charlotte, North Carolina. USA .
A lawyer purchased a box of very rare and expensive cigars, then insured them against, among other things, fire.
Within a month, having smoked his entire stockpile of these great cigars and without yet having made even his first premium payment on the policy, the lawyer filed a claim against the insurance company.
In his claim, the lawyer stated the cigars were lost 'in a series of small fires.'
The insurance company refused to pay, citing the obvious reason, that the man had consumed the cigars in the normal fashion.
The lawyer sued.. and WON!
(Stay with me.)
Delivering the ruling, the judge agreed with the insurance company that the claim was frivolous. The judge stated nevertheless, that the lawyer held a policy from the company, which it had warranted that the cigars were insurable and also guaranteed that it would insure them against fire, without defining what is considered to be unacceptable fire' and was obligated to pay the claim!
Rather than endure lengthy and costly appeal process, the insurance company accepted the ruling and paid $15,000 to the lawyer for his loss of the cigars lost in the 'fires'.
NOW, FOR THE BEST PART
After the lawyer cashed the check, the insurance company had him arrested on 24 counts of ARSON!!!
With his own insurance claim and testimony from the previous case being used against him, the lawyer was convicted of intentionally burning his insured property and was sentenced to 24 months in jail and a $24,000 fine.
This is a true story and was the First Place winner in the recent Criminal Lawyers Award Contest!
post #38,099
14 January 2009, 09:52 UTC#38,099
old.
post #38,100
14 January 2009, 09:55 UTC#38,100
When you see a launch from the outside it's a rather glorious magnificent thing. Inside is the absolute opposite of that, It's 137 decibels and its shaking. Everything is shaking.
Also, Jurassic Park yeah!
Also, Jurassic Park yeah!