17 December 2005, 21:24 UTC#1,471
o ok.. well like I said fix it and your sorted.. what I do for somethings shadow is copy the same layer.. fit it flat to the ground and sizxe it right.. and change the levels (ctrl + l) and make it all black.. might need to change the blending too.. but up 2 u??
17 December 2005, 22:28 UTC#1,472
New sig..
17 December 2005, 22:38 UTC#1,473
QUOTE(The Milkman @ Dec 17 2005, 10:28 PM)
New sig..
[right][snapback]246093[/snapback][/right]
sexual
17 December 2005, 23:35 UTC#1,474
New web layout..iv got plenty more but im proud of this one.
[attachmentid=3617]
if your wondering bout a banner etc.. any band logo or name would be on the splash page.
Attachments
scream.jpg · 369 KB
Attachment metadata survives, but the file is absent from the recovered server backup.
17 December 2005, 23:36 UTC#1,475
Cool stuff man. Would be nicer with colour. And I cant really see with the 'text text text...' written all over.
Looks good though.
17 December 2005, 23:40 UTC#1,476
QUOTE(Mono @ Dec 18 2005, 12:36 AM)
Cool stuff man. Would be nicer with colour. And I cant really see with the 'text text text...' written all over.
Looks good though.
[right][snapback]246145[/snapback][/right]
There u go mono..I had the idea in my head and was thinking all black/white so just went with that..
[attachmentid=3618]
had to add the grey box so I people could see the text.. pisses me off abit because u cant see the graphic as much.
Attachments
scream2.jpg · 178 KB
Attachment metadata survives, but the file is absent from the recovered server backup.
17 December 2005, 23:49 UTC#1,477
QUOTE(broken silence @ Dec 17 2005, 11:40 PM)
QUOTE(Mono @ Dec 18 2005, 12:36 AM)
Cool stuff man. Would be nicer with colour. And I cant really see with the 'text text text...' written all over.
Looks good though.
[right][snapback]246145[/snapback][/right]
There u go mono..I had the idea in my head and was thinking all black/white so just went with that..
[attachmentid=3618]
had to add the grey box so I people could see the text.. pisses me off abit because u cant see the graphic as much.
[right][snapback]246147[/snapback][/right]
that looks sweet man
17 December 2005, 23:52 UTC#1,478
thanks man.. still pissed off with the grey box for the content.. anyone got any idea's???
18 December 2005, 12:31 UTC#1,479
QUOTE(broken silence @ Dec 18 2005, 12:52 AM)
thanks man.. still pissed off with the grey box for the content.. anyone got any idea's???
[right][snapback]246152[/snapback][/right]
18 December 2005, 12:39 UTC#1,480
QUOTE(broken silence @ Dec 18 2005, 01:35 AM)
New web layout..iv got plenty more but im proud of this one.
[attachmentid=3617]
if your wondering bout a banner etc.. any band logo or name would be on the splash page.
[right][snapback]246143[/snapback][/right]
QUOTE(broken silence @ Dec 18 2005, 01:40 AM)
QUOTE(Mono @ Dec 18 2005, 12:36 AM)
Cool stuff man. Would be nicer with colour. And I cant really see with the 'text text text...' written all over.
Looks good though.
[right][snapback]246145[/snapback][/right]
There u go mono..I had the idea in my head and was thinking all black/white so just went with that..
[attachmentid=3618]
had to add the grey box so I people could see the text.. pisses me off abit because u cant see the graphic as much.
[right][snapback]246147[/snapback][/right]
Unfortunately I don't like it
Image file not present in the recovered backup Just not my style, and I always think of search engines when looking at proposed site layouts these days.
18 December 2005, 12:43 UTC#1,481
QUOTE
Just not my style, and I always think of search engines when looking at proposed site layouts these days.
[right][snapback]246437[/snapback][/right]
Why search engines? Whats that got to do with it?
18 December 2005, 15:48 UTC#1,482
just something I through togther for a sig maybe...kinda inspired by toms recent ones...what ya think...be gentle...
External image not preserved — inspect source: http://img370.imageshack.us/img370/3728/seductive24td.jpg18 December 2005, 15:50 UTC#1,483
Hottie!
18 December 2005, 15:53 UTC#1,484
You guys are crazy with sigs. Chiillll
18 December 2005, 15:53 UTC#1,485
QUOTE(Leif Erikson @ Dec 18 2005, 04:53 PM)
You guys are crazy with sigs. Chiillll
[right][snapback]246570[/snapback][/right]
I would but seeing as im a total newfuck to PS there easy to do and learn the basix
18 December 2005, 16:29 UTC#1,486
broken silence, will you help me out with a layout when I get the All Balls hosting? PM me.
18 December 2005, 16:58 UTC#1,487
QUOTE(Leif Erikson @ Dec 18 2005, 03:53 PM)
You guys are crazy with sigs. Chiillll
[right][snapback]246570[/snapback][/right]
word
18 December 2005, 17:05 UTC#1,488
QUOTE(urban_ben @ Dec 18 2005, 02:43 PM)
QUOTE
Just not my style, and I always think of search engines when looking at proposed site layouts these days.
[right][snapback]246437[/snapback][/right]
Why search engines? Whats that got to do with it?
[right][snapback]246440[/snapback][/right]
Because image heavy sites do not rank well. It's better to design the basic images, such as as the header for the site then do the rest with CSS, attaching style classes and id's to all of your page elements. Makes it easily changeable, don't have to redesign when you want to change the page layout and syndicates images with content. That layout is all photoshop, wouldn't rank well and looks cheap.
18 December 2005, 17:07 UTC#1,489
CSS is the way forward
18 December 2005, 17:09 UTC#1,490
can css do expanding content areas?
18 December 2005, 17:09 UTC#1,491
I tried CSS once. I didn't get it.
18 December 2005, 17:10 UTC#1,492
go tables !!! wooot
18 December 2005, 17:12 UTC#1,493
I suck balls at css, I can do the VERY basics
18 December 2005, 17:14 UTC#1,494
I got a new sig I wanna "show off"
18 December 2005, 17:14 UTC#1,495
EDIT: Sorry it posted twice..
18 December 2005, 17:16 UTC#1,496
put some text in it
18 December 2005, 17:21 UTC#1,497
QUOTE(The Milkman @ Dec 18 2005, 05:14 PM)
I got a new sig I wanna "show off"
[right][snapback]246672[/snapback][/right]
looks pritty sweet apart from the white border
18 December 2005, 17:47 UTC#1,498
I love that border Image file not present in the recovered backup
18 December 2005, 19:10 UTC#1,499
New face I just finished.
Attachments
face_grunge_copy.jpg · 254 KB
Attachment metadata survives, but the file is absent from the recovered server backup.
18 December 2005, 19:11 UTC#1,500
eeewww is that a catepiller in the nose?
