16 December 2005, 12:41 UTC#1,441
QUOTE(John @ Dec 16 2005, 12:40 PM)
2 many brushes in the background and not fussed on the text
not bad tho
16 December 2005, 12:41 UTC#1,442
Thats fucking good, the text looks great in the background.
16 December 2005, 12:42 UTC#1,443
made this quick, beware of fish
Attachments
fishy_copy.gif · 263 KB
Attachment metadata survives, but the file is absent from the recovered server backup.
16 December 2005, 12:43 UTC#1,444
cheers gaiz
16 December 2005, 18:52 UTC#1,445
Made this sig For Jem..
looks good to me
[attachmentid=3569]
Attachments
Untitled_1.jpg · 123 KB
Attachment metadata survives, but the file is absent from the recovered server backup.
16 December 2005, 20:26 UTC#1,446
A bit big don't you think?
16 December 2005, 20:28 UTC#1,447
QUOTE(The Milkman @ Dec 16 2005, 09:26 PM)
A bit big don't you think?
[right][snapback]245023[/snapback][/right]
nothing wrong with a HUGE sig
16 December 2005, 20:29 UTC#1,448
Bulky is sloppy. I think.
16 December 2005, 20:34 UTC#1,449
womp, diddt u have a kickass sig like 2 days ago? The new ones no where near as good.
16 December 2005, 20:36 UTC#1,450
yeah I did...and your right it was kickass but johnbordumb has a point...my last 2 sig's have been ripoff's straight from senses fail...so I decided to lose it a bit...and I resized it...so I hope your happy now tom
16 December 2005, 20:36 UTC#1,451
QUOTE(The Milkman @ Dec 16 2005, 09:26 PM)
A bit big don't you think?
[right][snapback]245023[/snapback][/right]
not made for a sig that size... if Jem uses it as a sig then it would be shrunk to this size..
http://homegrownforums.com/index.php?act=A...pe=post&id=356816 December 2005, 20:51 UTC#1,452
Yeah I didn't wanna seem like a dick, lol. I was just saying.
Looks good though man. Both that and Womps
16 December 2005, 21:07 UTC#1,453
lol havent made womps yet
16 December 2005, 21:13 UTC#1,454
Ahh true but the resized one of his current sig is good
16 December 2005, 21:13 UTC#1,455
QUOTE(The Milkman @ Dec 16 2005, 10:13 PM)
Ahh true but the resized one of his current sig is good
[right][snapback]245077[/snapback][/right]
<3 j00
16 December 2005, 21:29 UTC#1,456
New work..
[attachmentid=3578]
Attachments
Untitled_2.jpg · 98 KB
Attachment metadata survives, but the file is absent from the recovered server backup.
16 December 2005, 23:25 UTC#1,457
QUOTE(womp @ Dec 16 2005, 03:36 PM)
yeah I did...and your right it was kickass but johnbordumb has a point...my last 2 sig's have been ripoff's straight from senses fail...so I decided to lose it a bit...and I resized it...so I hope your happy now tom
[right][snapback]245031[/snapback][/right]
Fuck John right in the ass...tell him to quit being a whiney bitch....put the last one back up...I loved it...
p.s. John, quit downing other people's sigs....bitch..
<3
16 December 2005, 23:27 UTC#1,458
QUOTE(r0b @ Dec 17 2005, 12:25 AM)
QUOTE(womp @ Dec 16 2005, 03:36 PM)
yeah I did...and your right it was kickass but johnbordumb has a point...my last 2 sig's have been ripoff's straight from senses fail...so I decided to lose it a bit...and I resized it...so I hope your happy now tom
[right][snapback]245031[/snapback][/right]
Fuck John right in the ass...tell him to quit being a whiney bitch....put the last one back up...I loved it...
p.s. John, quit downing other people's sigs....bitch..
[right][snapback]245249[/snapback][/right]
thanks man...dont worry fans of womps sig's my "man with arm on fire" sig will make a return...when? I do not no! but fear not for it will be back!
anyway I still gotta use broken silences one first before I put that one back up...and im growing quite attatched to my current "bluey electricy eye" sig
17 December 2005, 04:05 UTC#1,459
17 December 2005, 04:42 UTC#1,460
17 December 2005, 04:59 UTC#1,461
17 December 2005, 10:26 UTC#1,462
nice one leif
17 December 2005, 13:41 UTC#1,463
QUOTE(itsallinthehips @ Dec 17 2005, 04:59 AM)
You spelt your name wrong
17 December 2005, 19:38 UTC#1,464
This is my first ever peice Ive done on photoshop, just been playing with it for first time today, but im quite pleased with this:
photobucket has made it small
Image file not present in the recovered backup External image not preserved — inspect source: http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b218/Secretdex/Birthdefect.jpg17 December 2005, 21:12 UTC#1,465
17 December 2005, 21:18 UTC#1,466
its pretty cool.. so is urs dex
womp fix the bit at the front of the lorry and your sorted
17 December 2005, 21:18 UTC#1,467
QUOTE(womp @ Dec 17 2005, 10:12 PM)
just something I threw together for a sig or something...im a new fuck to PS so be gentle
External image not preserved — inspect source: http://img458.imageshack.us/img458/633/trucksig8qd.jpg[right][snapback]246041[/snapback][/right]
Did you add the truck?
cos it looks cool, I'd just say the writing looks out of place.
17 December 2005, 21:20 UTC#1,468
QUOTE(broken silence @ Dec 17 2005, 10:18 PM)
its pretty cool.. so is urs dex
womp fix the bit at the front of the lorry and your sorted
[right][snapback]246046[/snapback][/right]
what bit at the front?
17 December 2005, 21:22 UTC#1,469
QUOTE(womp @ Dec 17 2005, 10:20 PM)
QUOTE(broken silence @ Dec 17 2005, 10:18 PM)
its pretty cool.. so is urs dex
womp fix the bit at the front of the lorry and your sorted
[right][snapback]246046[/snapback][/right]
what bit at the front?
[right][snapback]246048[/snapback][/right]
under the front... theres a big black line and solid black bit
17 December 2005, 21:23 UTC#1,470
QUOTE(broken silence @ Dec 17 2005, 10:22 PM)
QUOTE(womp @ Dec 17 2005, 10:20 PM)
QUOTE(broken silence @ Dec 17 2005, 10:18 PM)
its pretty cool.. so is urs dex
womp fix the bit at the front of the lorry and your sorted
[right][snapback]246046[/snapback][/right]
what bit at the front?
[right][snapback]246048[/snapback][/right]
under the front... theres a big black line and solid black bit
[right][snapback]246049[/snapback][/right]
yeah that was meant to be shadow but it came out shite
