Forum index / General Chat / North Korea

North Korea

43 posts · page 2 of 2

post #31
08 April 2009, 10:46 UTC#31
QUOTE(mK3 @ Apr 8 2009, 03:36 AM) [snapback]543759[/snapback]

You do forget that the majority of us here do not agree with our government buddy. We have to deal with the shit daily.

No I don't "forget", haha. You're trying to convince me of something that you apparently "don't agree with", so that's your problem, not mine. This isn't an anti-America rant, I have the same problem with any global power doing the same thing, including Britain. I'll say it again, my only issue is with countries - MAINLY America, but also a lot of others - stockpiling weapons, then denying others the ability to do that too. Fucking hell, the US even invaded Iraq on the premise that they had, what, one missile base? And the American collection of missile bases probably covers the whole of Iraq itself when put together? And the only justification for this is the government view that they're right and can be trusted but no one else can.

I'd also like to state that I don't WANT everyone to have nukes and fuckoff rockets, I want no one to have them. I wouldn't mind if countries were invaded to stop weapons programs if the invading countries didn't have nukes and shit of their own, because that's a preventative measure to stop a nation from having more power than it should. But when you go to war to stop a country from doing something that you're doing too purely on the basis of your preconceptions for that country, that's fucking hypocritical and you cannot argue with that.

tl;dr not aimed solely at America, I don't believe in a total end to war, I don't want everyone to have nukes.
post #32
08 April 2009, 17:26 UTC#32
QUOTE(Liam @ Apr 8 2009, 11:46 AM) [snapback]543796[/snapback]


tl;dr not aimed solely at America, I don't believe in a total end to war, I don't want everyone to have nukes.


But that's not going to happen....ever. So the next best thing is at least to let only countries who aint ruled by crazy dictators who have the possibility of loosing control over their stockpiles (as with the soviet union) when the next coup happens...surely?
post #33
08 April 2009, 18:30 UTC#33
Yeah man, I'm gonna get myself a sick arsenal of nukes when I grow up so smell my heiny Liam
post #34
08 April 2009, 18:31 UTC#34
I'm gonna buy one nuke when I'm 80 and chill in central US with a list of demands.
post #35
09 April 2009, 06:34 UTC#35
For those of you that think 3rd world countries don't know what technology is.

QUOTE
Pyongyang's state radio accused U.S. RC-135 surveillance aircraft of spying on the launch site on its northeast coast, according to South Korea's Unification Ministry, which is in charge of monitoring the North.

"If the brigandish U.S. imperialists dare to infiltrate spy planes into our airspace to interfere with our peaceful satellite launch preparations, our revolutionary armed forces will mercilessly shoot them down," the ministry quoted the radio as saying.

It was unclear what capability the North Korea has to shoot down the high-flying Boeing RC-135, which can reach altitudes of nearly 10 miles (15 kilometers) high. The threat came a day after the North claimed the U.S. and South Korea conducted about 190 spy flights over its territory in March, including over the sea off the launch site.
post #36
09 April 2009, 06:52 UTC#36
Well, there was tons of pictures of the launch site from spy planes and satellites in the metro (a free daily newspaper in england), so North Korea just got the bus. Nothing special.
post #37
09 April 2009, 08:00 UTC#37
I think this was before they announced that they were going to launch the missile. Not positive though.
post #38
11 April 2009, 20:12 UTC#38
how you diggin Camarillo Mike?
post #39
12 April 2009, 09:44 UTC#39
It's quite. Ventura and Santa Barbara rock. Malibu's def sweet too. Can't wait for summer to hit. Matt (Nail through hand) is trying to move out in August. Looking at houses in LA.

Fucking get in touch with me. Be cool to me up with Mr. Pron himself.

<3
post #41
13 April 2009, 21:52 UTC#41
It's not just the kids. It's the whole country. People can't even leave. If they get caught they get the firing squad.
post #42
13 April 2009, 22:15 UTC#42
Yeah man, if you watched the documentary, they talk about everything going on over there. They just use the kids as a catalyst to get sympathy and draw attention.
post #43
13 April 2009, 22:20 UTC#43
Another reason why countries shouldnt be allowed nukes. If you cant look after your own people you shouldn't be allowed to waste countless millions on weapons. Look what you support liam, you make me sick.