Forum index / Cameras / Hdv Vs Vx & Gl/xm

Hdv Vs Vx & Gl/xm

42 posts · page 2 of 2

post #31
12 September 2007, 00:04 UTC#31
well I am just saying they have good low light
post #32
12 September 2007, 00:14 UTC#32
QUOTE(vode @ Sep 11 2007, 04:43 PM) [snapback]436536[/snapback]

So 3ccd or cheap HDV?

I rememeber weak saying that cheap hdv is way worse in low light than 3ccd?


My HDV has way better low light quality than my 3ccd.
post #33
12 September 2007, 00:17 UTC#33
models?

btw hunni, check my last post for secret messages :happy:
post #34
12 September 2007, 12:59 UTC#34
Would be strange though, that single sensor camera would have better lowlight filming than multiple sensor cameras. Specially when the sensor is as small as in those little hdv´s.

And I found some comparison pictures from internet and at least hc7 lost to gl2 in lowlight, in my opinion.
post #35
12 September 2007, 13:41 UTC#35
QUOTE(vode @ Sep 12 2007, 02:59 PM) [snapback]436723[/snapback]

And I found some comparison pictures from internet and at least hc7 lost to gl2 in lowlight, in my opinion.


care to show me these? thanks man
post #37
16 September 2007, 22:28 UTC#37
QUOTE(Funk Master Shiestorz @ Sep 12 2007, 02:14 AM) [snapback]436603[/snapback]

QUOTE(vode @ Sep 11 2007, 04:43 PM) [snapback]436536[/snapback]

So 3ccd or cheap HDV?

I rememeber weak saying that cheap hdv is way worse in low light than 3ccd?


My HDV has way better low light quality than my 3ccd.



QUOTE(vode @ Sep 12 2007, 02:17 AM) [snapback]436605[/snapback]

models?

btw hunni, check my last post for secret messages :happy:

post #38
16 September 2007, 22:44 UTC#38
does anyone know about buying lights for vx2000s...like is it good for low lighting or is it just ridculas
post #39
16 September 2007, 23:06 UTC#39
There is too many variables. It depends on what kind of light do you get, cheap or pro. It also depends on the subject you are recording. It depends on lots of things, but over all, light is better than no-light in low light situation. You might want to start own thread about camera lights.

Back to the thread:
Review that says hc7´s low light sucks.
http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/Sony-...rder-Review.htm
On the bottom of the page theres is guy making a comment that says its because of some option. Dont know what to think about then.
post #40
17 September 2007, 02:19 UTC#40
the comment says the reviewer over looked an option and once changed it was alot better than the HC3..instead of the other way round.

id go with the guy who owns and knows what hes talking about instead of the lousy reviewer
post #41
17 September 2007, 02:32 UTC#41
QUOTE(vode @ Sep 11 2007, 08:17 PM) [snapback]436605[/snapback]

btw hunni, check my last post for secret messages :happy:


I'm gonna have to keep that in mind for all future posts.
post #42
17 September 2007, 11:44 UTC#42
kk, but what cams are you talking about? What kind of camera is your hdv and what 3ccd?

Webby, yeah but I´ve read also other reviews that werent too impressed by the low light. I´d like to read more about that option that could change it around.

I´ve also read lots about the 3ccd vs. hdv, that is actually 3ccd vs. cmos, because most of the small hdv cams use cmos instead ccd. The conclusion I´ve come up with, is that one big cmos (1/2.7) would be better than three small ccd´s (1/6)