A Rant.

I'll reply to your post when I have the energy to do so, at the moment I really can't be bothered though, that shit is just too fucking long lol

Charles Darwin lived in a time so far removed from ours that to bring up his personal religious beliefs is irrelevant. His theories form the building blocks for almost every thesis discussing the non-existence of God; whether he was a Christian or not is irrelevant due to the time he lived in. You might as well say he was white; 99% of the scientists of the period were, but fuck it, let's just throw it in there because it bolsters a claim!



I've heard this phrase, and I don't agree at all. A deep study of science demonstrates Quantum, evolution and physics. Please explain to me exactly how this forces a belief in God. Don't just pepper your posts with phrases that sound good yet don't actually explain anything.



Lions and tigers and bears, oh my! Got a little deep there, didn't you Princess? Now while you spout your self-involved pretension that could have been ripped from the mouths of any of pseudo-alternative music intellectual circa the early 1990s at many urban colleges and Sonic Youth shows, think about this: while a lot of people may use hypocrisy as a reason not to follow religion, you can't feasibly counter them by pointing out the flaws of the world around us. Your argument smacks of Catholicism and all its self-blaming theology; it's us the people who have confused God's message. He didn't mean for it to be this way! If we were all better people, we would know for sure if divinity exists! Sorry, won't cut it in any average-level debate anywhere in the world. Fact is, there is no deductive argument for the existence of God. Every time science eliminates a Biblical teaching, it suddenly becomes apparent to every man and his dog that whichever grand scribe penned that particular section didn't mean for it to be interpreted literally you sillies. Bah.



Yet more vague, pointless banter from you. 'In the general scheme of things'? Please elaborate.
And the only one looking like a fuckhead is you, by continuing the great Biblical tradition of murky declarations that could be taken any of 20 ways.



Can't you assert your point without announcing that everyone else is either ignorant or a fuckhead? I sense some kind if inferiority complex here that forces you to insult everyone who doesn't agree with you.



Cheers for that, it's going under my 'comedy' bookmark section.

Amongst other things, the author cites as one of his 'arguments' what can be simplified as the "things get old, without a 'divine mechanic' the Universe would simply fall apart like a 40 year old automobile". This is by far one of the most idiotic and illogical theories I have ever heard.

He cites Sagen, a man who has been widely criticised by many, including professors from NASA, as bluntly ignoring the law of gravity and other such astronomical certainties in his papers.

He attempts to 'prove' the existence of God through demonstrating the Sun and stars use up hydrogen, thereby implying the Universe had a beginning. Congratulations to the author, he has just bypassed the theory of Infinite Regress. Now that he is on an equal footing with Arab theologians hundreds of years ago, perhaps he can possibly assert proof that this beginning was instigated by a divine power?



And here we are, Ladies and Gents, the stubborn determination that forms the backbone of any die-hard religious scholar! The staunch rejection of any opposition as either biased, mistaken or downright deluded. For someone who so readily accuses others of ignorance, you really fling the insults around, don't you?




Now it's been fun, but you need to stop the aggression. Maybe if you had come in and conveyed your point with a level head and respect for others instead of simply stating 'this is shit', you wouldn't have been met with the reception you got. The only reason myself and others have had to fuck about with you is because you take yourself far too seriously.

Charles Darwin lived in a time so far removed from ours that to bring up his personal religious beliefs is irrelevant. His theories form the building blocks for almost every thesis discussing the non-existence of God; whether he was a Christian or not is irrelevant due to the time he lived in. You might as well say he was white; 99% of the scientists of the period were, but fuck it, let's just throw it in there because it bolsters a claim!

I've heard this phrase, and I don't agree at all. A deep study of science demonstrates Quantum, evolution and physics. Please explain to me exactly how this forces a belief in God. Don't just pepper your posts with phrases that sound good yet don't actually explain anything.

He attempts to 'prove' the existence of God through demonstrating the Sun and stars use up hydrogen, thereby implying the Universe had a beginning. Congratulations to the author, he has just bypassed the theory of Infinite Regress. Now that he is on an equal footing with Arab theologians hundreds of years ago, perhaps he can possibly assert proof that this beginning was instigated by a divine power?

No really you know, some people believe that life was DESIGNED to evolve if you know what I mean...I'm not saying this is what Darwin believed, but it does provide an explanation that involves both an evolutionary and creationist perpective...

Oh alright, I'll make a few more posts, say what you want, just don't make it too long.

I prefer the term 'debate' over agrument as well lol

I rarely use the word 'debate' on here, just in case Al reads the topic and we all have to sit through his "let's all have a mass debate!" jokes. I hate you, Al. Image file not present in the recovered backup

Yeah, I was impressed too, despite the fact he only made two stand out points my mind, one of which I have already noted in a previous post. Still, made me think a bit

I would also like to take back my statement about there being evidence to "prove" the existance/non-existance of god. A better word would have been "suggest", sorry to have caused any confusion there.

If you consider that pwning you aint seen the boards I used to post on man, trust me that was nothing.

y\'all going to burn in hell

y'all going to burn in hell

If there was a god and a heaven there would be no hell, as god is meant to be all forgiving yeah?

The bible is the most contradictory peice of crap in exsistance, I dont claim to know shit loads on these topics but went too a christian priimary school and looking back it does teach good basic moral codes ect for kids, but really should contradict it's self alot less if people were really meant to belive the shit.

You're drunk and quoting your philosophy lessons. Start by reading the post sober, then realise that not everything is the black-and-white outlook of Offsted Subject criteria.