13 July 2006, 13:22 UTC#1
Okay in the DVD there is one prank and one stunt that have to be in the DVD but have some underage ass.
If it's not in a pornographic fashion is it okay to put in a DVD?
13 July 2006, 13:23 UTC#2
I cant see any problem man, its just ass :S
I could be wrong however.
13 July 2006, 13:35 UTC#3
QUOTE(tomm @ Jul 13 2006, 01:23 PM) [snapback]360369[/snapback]
I cant see any problem man, its just ass :S
I could be wrong however.
Yeah this is why I'm asking fagoot, stop sucking at life TOmm.
13 July 2006, 13:38 UTC#4
QUOTE(Funk Master Steven @ Jul 13 2006, 02:35 PM) [snapback]360371[/snapback]
QUOTE(tomm @ Jul 13 2006, 01:23 PM) [snapback]360369[/snapback]
I cant see any problem man, its just ass :S
I could be wrong however.
Yeah this is why I'm asking fagoot, stop sucking at life TOmm.
13 July 2006, 14:07 UTC#5
how old is the person?
its klicky-kat btw I thought I was logged on..geuss not
13 July 2006, 14:08 UTC#6
Knowing al id say 5-7?
13 July 2006, 14:10 UTC#7
lol.
as long as she has said yes to it then it shold be alright sholdnt it?
btw im not refuring it to be a 5-7yr old.
13 July 2006, 14:13 UTC#8
Im pretty sure it's legal.... it would only be classed as porn if it's displayed in a sexual manner, and if it's a stunt, I doubtit has anything to do with sex.
13 July 2006, 14:31 UTC#9
ass is not the same as boobs or vag, unless you can see her vag from behind.
13 July 2006, 14:36 UTC#10
QUOTE(EVIL-WEBBY @ Jul 13 2006, 02:07 PM) [snapback]360376[/snapback]
how old is the person?
its klicky-kat btw I thought I was logged on..geuss not
16 and 14.
13 July 2006, 14:38 UTC#11
QUOTE(Funk Master Steven @ Jul 13 2006, 03:36 PM) [snapback]360390[/snapback]
QUOTE(EVIL-WEBBY @ Jul 13 2006, 02:07 PM) [snapback]360376[/snapback]
how old is the person?
its klicky-kat btw I thought I was logged on..geuss not
16 and 14.
the 16 yr old is alright.
as long as the 14 yr old said its okay then it shold be fine if not just blur the face if u want but its only ass.
13 July 2006, 15:16 UTC#12
if you cant see their faces then your in the clear all the way...they cant do shit at all unless you show their face...and even then I dont think anybody would get upset because of an ass shot? but I could be wrong...
13 July 2006, 16:51 UTC#13
show us what your refuring to, we'll be able to say more clear
13 July 2006, 17:34 UTC#14
QUOTE(Funk Master Steven @ Jul 13 2006, 06:22 AM) [snapback]360368[/snapback]
Okay in the DVD there is one prank and one stunt that have to be in the DVD but have some underage ass.
If it's not in a pornographic fashion is it okay to put in a DVD?
It is illegal. Dick, pussy, ass, and tits is always off limits for those under 18 (in the US).
13 July 2006, 17:54 UTC#15
UNITED STATES CRIMINAL CODE ON UNDERAGE NUDITY:
18 U.S.C. 2256 – “CHILD PORNOGRAPHY” DEFINED
Child pornography is defined as any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where:
1.The production of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
2. Such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct
3. Such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct.
Basically, nudity is legal in an artistic way or humorous way with the person being under 18, but sexual nudity is not. It is a very fine line to walk, and that’s why many people don’t. So yes, your ass would be legal say if it was a girl "mooning" the camera with no sexual connotations attached to it. Non the less, Id be careful. So far in my work experience I have not come across a case like this yet, but I do know if someone tries to peruse it, even if the scene or picture is completely legal things can get sticky.
13 July 2006, 18:20 UTC#16
QUOTE(EVIL-WEBBY @ Jul 13 2006, 05:51 PM) [snapback]360453[/snapback]
show us what your refuring to, we'll be able to say more clear
13 July 2006, 18:25 UTC#17
QUOTE(urban_ben @ Jul 13 2006, 01:20 PM) [snapback]360472[/snapback]
QUOTE(EVIL-WEBBY @ Jul 13 2006, 05:51 PM) [snapback]360453[/snapback]
show us what your refuring to, we'll be able to say more clear
LOL I just explicitly laid out the law for him.... he can decided on his own from here.
13 July 2006, 18:36 UTC#18
QUOTE(dgodlewski @ Jul 13 2006, 07:25 PM) [snapback]360476[/snapback]
QUOTE(urban_ben @ Jul 13 2006, 01:20 PM) [snapback]360472[/snapback]
QUOTE(EVIL-WEBBY @ Jul 13 2006, 05:51 PM) [snapback]360453[/snapback]
show us what your refuring to, we'll be able to say more clear
LOL I just explicitly laid out the law for him.... he can decided on his own from here.
But I want nudity!
13 July 2006, 19:20 UTC#19
From a 14 year old?
13 July 2006, 19:30 UTC#20
Ben is that desperate for nudism.
www.pichunter.com <----ben go there for nude shit
13 July 2006, 19:36 UTC#21
QUOTE(x__made @ Jul 13 2006, 08:20 PM) [snapback]360498[/snapback]
From a 14 year old?
Ah k..but it wouldent be that much of an age diffrerence since im only 15.
And noe Juvie D! Porn is sick.. wouldent catch me dead looking at naked girls.
I was only saying it to fit in.13 July 2006, 19:40 UTC#22
QUOTE
Porn is sick.. wouldent catch me dead looking at naked girls.
Good boy. Porn is for people that believe in the Devil.
14 July 2006, 00:45 UTC#23
QUOTE(Funk Master Steven @ Jul 13 2006, 01:22 PM) [snapback]360368[/snapback]
Okay in the DVD there is one prank and one stunt that have to be in the DVD but have some underage ass.
If it's not in a pornographic fashion is it okay to put in a DVD?
Al your fucking retarted if you weren't such a lazy ass you could've just gotten up of your comp and asked me, I mean it doesn't even show her face and chances are nobody important is ever gonna watch that footage, I mean c'mon every body wasn't this dvd supposedly coming out for the last two years.
14 July 2006, 03:17 UTC#24
QUOTE(dgodlewski @ Jul 13 2006, 05:54 PM) [snapback]360468[/snapback]
UNITED STATES CRIMINAL CODE ON UNDERAGE NUDITY:
18 U.S.C. 2256 – “CHILD PORNOGRAPHY” DEFINED
Child pornography is defined as any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where:
1.The production of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
2. Such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct
3. Such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct.
Basically, nudity is legal in an artistic way or humorous way with the person being under 18, but sexual nudity is not. It is a very fine line to walk, and that’s why many people don’t. So yes, your ass would be legal say if it was a girl "mooning" the camera with no sexual connotations attached to it. Non the less, Id be careful. So far in my work experience I have not come across a case like this yet, but I do know if someone tries to peruse it, even if the scene or picture is completely legal things can get sticky.
Okay one clip is my brother shooting a bottle rocket out of his ass, the second clip is me wearing a thong of drug free stickers and jumping in front of my mom 'n shit.
14 July 2006, 03:47 UTC#25
Like doogle said, if it's not sexual...its not really illegal.
On the flip side...there are non-nude teen sites out there...where you have 16 year olds who are in fact covering their tits, ass, and vagina...but because it's sexually suggestive...it causes quite a bit of controversy.
14 July 2006, 04:13 UTC#26
QUOTE(WEAK @ Jul 13 2006, 10:47 PM) [snapback]360611[/snapback]
Like doogle said, if it's not sexual...its not really illegal.
On the flip side...there are non-nude teen sites out there...where you have 16 year olds who are in fact covering their tits, ass, and vagina...but because it's sexually suggestive...it causes quite a bit of controversy.
Link?
14 July 2006, 06:01 UTC#27
Yeah, the United States law draws a very gray line when it comes to underage nudity, but it's better to be safe than sorry because sometimes it's not the law you'll need to worry about, it's the parents.
14 July 2006, 06:04 UTC#28
damn Mr. Saftey you sure do know alot
14 July 2006, 06:05 UTC#29
QUOTE(MattG @ Jul 14 2006, 02:04 AM) [snapback]360666[/snapback]
damn Mr. Saftey you sure do know alot
*slurp slurp slurp*
14 July 2006, 06:06 UTC#30
exactly?
Image file not present in the recovered backup 
Image file not present in the recovered backup