Read-only historical archive Reconstructed community archive · captured 17 November 2010

Forum index / General Chat / ???

???

87 posts · page 3 of 3

tom wright
post #61
18 December 2005, 19:34 UTC#61
Its a weymouth truf war.

EDIT: Quote "I will smash them up if I find out they're the chavs who have ruined our Sandsfoot and Two post partys ( names of the beaches were we get hammered ). "
S.Monkeys
post #62
18 December 2005, 20:03 UTC#62
hey wait a sec 4 1 I aint even in that film and I aint a chav, my mate is but im not, and 2 we didnt get u in shit with school I didnt even talk about it at school
Doyle
post #63
18 December 2005, 20:06 UTC#63
you said you hated chavs... not your friends with one.... You lie. I am not your friend anymore
WEAK
post #64
18 December 2005, 20:43 UTC#64
new members fucking suck
Mono
post #65
18 December 2005, 20:44 UTC#65
QUOTE(WEAK @ Dec 18 2005, 08:43 PM)
new members fucking suck
[right][snapback]246891[/snapback][/right]

Amen.
Oli
post #66
18 December 2005, 21:13 UTC#66
QUOTE(S.Monkeys @ Dec 18 2005, 08:03 PM)
hey wait a sec 4 1 I aint even in that film and I aint a chav, my mate is but im not, and 2 we didnt get u in shit with school I didnt even talk about it at school
[right][snapback]246865[/snapback][/right]


Wat da fuk mate. U cnt spell 4 sht. Image file not present in the recovered backup Image file not present in the recovered backup Image file not present in the recovered backup Image file not present in the recovered backup

Edet: Fukin ace fred nme btw dewd.
Doyle
post #67
18 December 2005, 21:16 UTC#67
QUOTE(WEAK @ Dec 18 2005, 09:43 PM)
new members fucking suck
[right][snapback]246891[/snapback][/right]

So true dude. Close reg and let us old fucks run this place. That will show them. HGF4LIFE
Oli
post #68
18 December 2005, 21:22 UTC#68
Members 221 and over to be banned?


Sounds good to me.
Wilbur
post #69
18 December 2005, 21:27 UTC#69
Sounds shitty to me.
The Milkman
post #70
18 December 2005, 21:27 UTC#70
I second that.
tomm
post #71
18 December 2005, 21:32 UTC#71
anything over 500
Wilbur
post #73
18 December 2005, 21:38 UTC#73
QUOTE(urban_ben @ Dec 18 2005, 09:32 PM)
QUOTE(The Milkman @ Dec 18 2005, 10:27 PM)
I second that.
[right][snapback]246943[/snapback][/right]


Yeah I know...I also said that aswell...in a video..
[right][snapback]246951[/snapback][/right]

The Milkman Member No.: 1,073
Oli
post #74
18 December 2005, 21:46 UTC#74
QUOTE(Wilbur @ Dec 18 2005, 09:38 PM)
QUOTE(urban_ben @ Dec 18 2005, 09:32 PM)
QUOTE(The Milkman @ Dec 18 2005, 10:27 PM)
I second that.
[right][snapback]246943[/snapback][/right]


Yeah I know...I also said that aswell...in a video..
[right][snapback]246951[/snapback][/right]

The Milkman Member No.: 1,073
[right][snapback]246962[/snapback][/right]



All the more reason Image file not present in the recovered backup



































jk Image file not present in the recovered backup
Shawn
post #75
18 December 2005, 21:58 UTC#75
D-D-D-D-D-DUMBASS! haha n00b
westie
post #76
18 December 2005, 22:06 UTC#76
I want to play in the weymouth turf war! and callum watch our mixup and you added me on msn but never bothered speaking to me, whats up with that? weymouth is turning into the new petersfield Image file not present in the recovered backup
The Milkman
post #77
18 December 2005, 22:10 UTC#77
FFFFFFFFIIIIIIIIGGGGGGGGHT!!!!1
tom wright
post #78
18 December 2005, 23:48 UTC#78
QUOTE(The Milkman @ Dec 18 2005, 10:10 PM)
FFFFFFFFIIIIIIIIGGGGGGGGHT!!!!1
[right][snapback]247027[/snapback][/right]



Thats true, last weak tom from C-A was almost stabbed.






Yep chavs.
THC
post #79
18 December 2005, 23:59 UTC#79
QUOTE(Oli @ Dec 18 2005, 04:22 PM)
Members 221 and over to be banned?


Sounds good to me.
[right][snapback]246933[/snapback][/right]

how about we just ban everyone under 3000 posts?
RandomActsofStupidity
post #80
19 December 2005, 01:10 UTC#80
Fuck that, I've been here from the very start and just because I don't spam constantly like some people doesn't mean I should be banned.
Doyle
post #81
19 December 2005, 01:11 UTC#81
Its stupid t ban on post count. I dont think WEAK or Gaz will do it anyway
Karl {dfilm}
post #82
19 December 2005, 01:13 UTC#82
they wouldnt consider doing either way. unless they = dumb
MattG
post #84
19 December 2005, 02:27 UTC#84
lmffcao... what a jerkass thread.. who are these guys?


QUOTE(The Milkman @ Dec 18 2005, 10:10 PM)
FFFFFFFFIIIIIIIIGGGGGGGGHT!!!!1
[right][snapback]247027[/snapback][/right]



dude where do u get all these bitches in your sigs?
Shaun C-A
post #85
24 December 2005, 11:56 UTC#85
Right. For everyone that is terribly confused by this thread. Basically the 's.monkeys' are a little bunch of 12 year olds that show no signs of improvement or any sort of originality in their videos. The reason he has made this completely rediculous thread is because he doesn't want to properly introduce his group. sucker.
The Milkman
post #86
24 December 2005, 12:07 UTC#86
QUOTE(MattG @ Dec 19 2005, 02:27 AM) [snapback]247276[/snapback]

lmffcao... what a jerkass thread.. who are these guys?


QUOTE(The Milkman @ Dec 18 2005, 10:10 PM)
FFFFFFFFIIIIIIIIGGGGGGGGHT!!!!1
[snapback]247027[/snapback]




dude where do u get all these bitches in your sigs?

The internet :D
sam[gomp]
post #87
24 December 2005, 12:08 UTC#87
QUOTE(The Milkman @ Dec 24 2005, 12:07 PM) [snapback]251017[/snapback]

QUOTE(MattG @ Dec 19 2005, 02:27 AM) [snapback]247276[/snapback]

lmffcao... what a jerkass thread.. who are these guys?


QUOTE(The Milkman @ Dec 18 2005, 10:10 PM)
FFFFFFFFIIIIIIIIGGGGGGGGHT!!!!1
[snapback]247027[/snapback]




dude where do u get all these bitches in your sigs?

The internet :D

See matt. you don't have to go emo to get chicks naked