16 December 2005, 23:28 UTC#1
This is from a new member on the b.I. forums.
QUOTE
Greetings from SoCal. I read about your site in the Riverside Press-Enterprise today. Sorry, looks like they dont have the article online, but I'm sure it was the same one you guys read yesterday. Got picked up nationally it looks like. Congrats, I'll be checking out your site regulary, so lets see some more frequent updates!"
Any of you know how our story could've gotten way out there in a completely different paper?
wierd......
16 December 2005, 23:29 UTC#2
someone might be fucking with you.
16 December 2005, 23:29 UTC#3
dude dont complain...more fans!
16 December 2005, 23:30 UTC#4
I'm def. not complaining, but I mean.... The story was written by a reporter for the palm beach post, FOR the palm beach post.
wtf?!
16 December 2005, 23:31 UTC#5
I have no clue, but Riverside is the white trash capital of California haha.
16 December 2005, 23:33 UTC#6
QUOTE(WEAK @ Dec 16 2005, 11:31 PM)
I have no clue, but Riverside is the white trash capital of California haha.
[right][snapback]245260[/snapback][/right]
Is there any way you can get ahold of that paper by chance?
we'd really like to see a copy.
16 December 2005, 23:39 UTC#7
uhh Riverside is like an hour away from me. A bit far of a drive for a newspaper. This person says they printed in the paper but not online? Sounds like someone is just fucking with you...dont know why.
Just ask the guy to scan the paper?
16 December 2005, 23:41 UTC#8
I actually read this story in helsingin sanomat(finnish newspaper)
16 December 2005, 23:44 UTC#9
QUOTE(j0nes @ Dec 16 2005, 11:41 PM)
I actually read this story in helsingin sanomat(finnish newspaper)
[right][snapback]245285[/snapback][/right]
can you get us a copy?! PLEASE?!
16 December 2005, 23:50 UTC#10
I think he is effin with ya, dear.
But I believe that guy that posted in BI, the Wired TV thing happened in Cali, it's not too far fetched.
16 December 2005, 23:52 UTC#11
he's not fucking with us.
I'll post the pic as soon as I resize.
Attachments
scan1.jpg · 95 KB
Attachment metadata survives, but the file is absent from the recovered server backup.
16 December 2005, 23:52 UTC#12
I saw it in the news of the world today aswell.
16 December 2005, 23:53 UTC#13
QUOTE(Skipper @ Dec 16 2005, 11:52 PM)
I saw it in the news of the world today aswell.
[right][snapback]245314[/snapback][/right]
FUCK can you please send us a copy?! PLEASE!?
16 December 2005, 23:55 UTC#14
Now I would be fuckign with ya.....News of the world!! BAH....get real!!

16 December 2005, 23:56 UTC#15
QUOTE(Skipper @ Dec 17 2005, 12:55 AM)
Now I would be fuckign with ya.....News of the world!! BAH....get real!!

[right][snapback]245321[/snapback][/right]
LMFAO...I actually believed you and started flicking through my mums paper looking for it
Image file not present in the recovered backup16 December 2005, 23:57 UTC#16
QUOTE(Skipper @ Dec 16 2005, 11:55 PM)
Now I would be fuckign with ya.....News of the world!! BAH....get real!!

[right][snapback]245321[/snapback][/right]
haha, you dick.
but I do wanna see if it made it to anyone else's paper!
if it made it to SoCal from Florida, there's no telling where else it went.
16 December 2005, 23:58 UTC#17
Maybe...THE MOON!!!
16 December 2005, 23:59 UTC#18
QUOTE(Skipper @ Dec 16 2005, 11:58 PM)
Maybe...THE MOON!!!
[right][snapback]245329[/snapback][/right]
Maybe....YOUR ASS???!?!?!?!?!?!
17 December 2005, 00:00 UTC#19
Child!
17 December 2005, 00:00 UTC#20
QUOTE(Skipper @ Dec 17 2005, 12:00 AM)
Child!
[right][snapback]245335[/snapback][/right]
Child Molester!
17 December 2005, 00:01 UTC#21
QUOTE(Boner Jones @ Dec 16 2005, 07:52 PM)
he's not fucking with us.
I'll post the pic as soon as I resize.
[right][snapback]245312[/snapback][/right]
They are fucking with you here!
I DO believe the guy who is in cali, though. Jeeeebus.
EDIT: Oh cool, it's by the same guy, I guess our local has affiliate papers that they print to.
17 December 2005, 00:03 UTC#22
QUOTE(Boner Jones @ Dec 17 2005, 12:00 AM)
QUOTE(Skipper @ Dec 17 2005, 12:00 AM)
Child!
[right][snapback]245335[/snapback][/right]
Child Molester!
[right][snapback]245338[/snapback][/right]
Child Molester Molester!
17 December 2005, 00:04 UTC#23
QUOTE(Skipper @ Dec 17 2005, 12:03 AM)
QUOTE(Boner Jones @ Dec 17 2005, 12:00 AM)
QUOTE(Skipper @ Dec 17 2005, 12:00 AM)
Child!
[right][snapback]245335[/snapback][/right]
Child Molester!
[right][snapback]245338[/snapback][/right]
Child Molester Molester!
[right][snapback]245345[/snapback][/right]
That's not even illegal!!!! Unless the child molester is underage. Which, in that case, would be a peer-molester.
what?!