Forum index / Photoshop, Editing & Design / Ulead or Pinnacle

Ulead or Pinnacle

16 posts · page 1 of 1

post #1
08 November 2005, 22:12 UTC#1
I need sum advice on which one of these video editing software to get. Any advice or other suggestions would be great biggrin.gif
post #2
08 November 2005, 22:14 UTC#2
get vegas or adobe
post #3
08 November 2005, 22:44 UTC#3
Never used Ulead but Pinnalce:

Pinnacle Studio is great, its easy to use and has a good comfortable layout.
It may say seem just a better looking version of Movie Maker, but it does go quite in depth on some effects, in which I mean how you can adjust and customise them.

As I said its easy, and has loads of different transitions, alot of effects, but most you have to buy, unless you "download".
I could go on, but basically its brilliant for beginners and for like "above average editors.

Theres many different features which I could list, its a brilliant programme.

Although it has many bugs, in nearly every version, I suggest you buy Studio 9 Plus, Ive heard 10 is a pile of crap, wait thats fact. Buy Studio Plus 9, dont download you can get all the effects by "downloading" them, and you also get bonus content stuff which has loads and loads of trnasitions and efffects, but the video effects....You have to buy, well I dont no where you can download them and I've looked for hours.

So get Studio plus 9, download the 9.3.4 patch and your good, theres very few bugs in there, with the other version stall, and stick when a project is being created.

overall 8/10, the bugs and unreliablness for me takes it down 2 points, other than it its brilliant.

But I suggest Premiere or Vegas like Extazy said, there better, more reliable, that few extra hours of learning them will pay off, I used to think Pinnacle was easier and better to use than Premiere, which I think it still, but Premiere and Vegas, you can go more in depth with your editing so go with one or them, its better in the long run, its just taken me a while to realize it.
post #4
08 November 2005, 22:48 UTC#4
Adobe Premiere Pro gets my vote.
post #5
08 November 2005, 23:37 UTC#5
sony vegas 6.0 gets my vote!
post #6
08 November 2005, 23:42 UTC#6
Pinnacle is way to buggy go with Ulead or Vegas.
post #8
10 November 2005, 05:07 UTC#8
QUOTE(Boner Jones @ Nov 8 2005, 11:37 PM)
sony vegas 6.0 gets my vote!
[right][snapback]217114[/snapback][/right]


I use that too, but im thinking of switching.....
post #9
10 November 2005, 05:54 UTC#9
Adobe tickles my fancy Image file not present in the recovered backup
post #10
04 December 2005, 06:40 UTC#10
QUOTE(The Arkhitekt @ Nov 10 2005, 05:54 AM)
Adobe tickles my fancy  Image file not present in the recovered backup
[right][snapback]218319[/snapback][/right]


Between Pinaccle and ULead, it's an either/or situation.

I'd recommend Premier or the free DV version of AVID for PC.
post #11
04 December 2005, 07:04 UTC#11
I just use Windows Movie Maker..STOCK
post #12
04 December 2005, 10:01 UTC#12
QUOTE(Extazy @ Nov 8 2005, 10:14 PM)
get vegas or adobe
[right][snapback]217061[/snapback][/right]



QUOTE(BaZ_LnN @ Nov 8 2005, 10:44 PM)
But I suggest Vegas
[right][snapback]217074[/snapback][/right]



QUOTE(Boner Jones @ Nov 8 2005, 11:37 PM)
sony vegas 6.0 gets my vote!
[right][snapback]217114[/snapback][/right]



QUOTE(Greg @ Nov 8 2005, 11:42 PM)
Pinnacle is way to buggy go with Vegas.
[right][snapback]217122[/snapback][/right]


Vegas is truley amazing, go with that!
post #13
04 December 2005, 20:44 UTC#13
Pinnacle and Ulead are just too overly-user friendly, so much so they're not customisable enough. They're like 'editing by numbers'.
post #14
04 December 2005, 22:01 UTC#14
pinnacle.

post #15
03 January 2006, 18:24 UTC#15
QUOTE(Word @ Nov 10 2005, 05:07 AM) [snapback]218305[/snapback]

QUOTE(Boner Jones @ Nov 8 2005, 11:37 PM)
sony vegas 6.0 gets my vote!
[snapback]217114[/snapback]



I use that too, but im thinking of switching.....

I tried Vegas once but it just conufsed the hell outta me. So many buttons and options. I guess I'd like to learn, it had some sweet effects.

For the time being Premier 6 gets me by. Would maybe switch to Premier Pro if it wasn't too different cause I hate change.
post #16
03 January 2006, 18:26 UTC#16
VEEEEEEEEGAAAAAAAAAAAS