Forum index / General Homegrown / Post a screencap thread

Post a screencap thread

3,810 posts · page 61 of 127

post #1,802
19 October 2007, 17:54 UTC#1,802
Each To There Own?

Do you mean "To Each, Their Own"?

or

Each To Their Own?

or do you have it titled like that purposely?
post #1,803
19 October 2007, 18:22 UTC#1,803
Each To Their Own. I didnt even think about what there spelling I used. thank for pointing it out, no one else has..not even the crew lol

QUOTE

Those pics were pretty weak mate.


like I said again and again, I dont have hardly any footage from the dvd on the compter yet.

and how are they weak? because you dont know what happens in most the footage maybe?
post #1,804
19 October 2007, 18:35 UTC#1,804
QUOTE(ill-advised @ Oct 19 2007, 02:22 PM) [snapback]444417[/snapback]

Each To Their Own. I didnt even think about what there spelling I used. thank for pointing it out, no one else has..not even the crew lol

QUOTE

Those pics were pretty weak mate.


like I said again and again, I dont have hardly any footage from the dvd on the compter yet.

and how are they weak? because you dont know what happens in most the footage maybe?


Naw,

9 pics of that oil fire.

2 pics of BMX riding

4 old possibly crazy people

1 pic of some guy fucking up a wall during a party

1 pic of Some cops trying to break up a party

Now there are only 5.

Your myspace fucked up.
post #1,805
19 October 2007, 18:44 UTC#1,805
myspace is one big fuck up

but I didnt ask you what images I had up, I know what they are, I want you to tell me why they are "pretty weak"
post #1,806
19 October 2007, 18:48 UTC#1,806
QUOTE(ill-advised @ Oct 19 2007, 02:44 PM) [snapback]444423[/snapback]

myspace is one big fuck up


Yep.
post #1,807
19 October 2007, 19:36 UTC#1,807
QUOTE(Funk Master Shiestorz @ Oct 19 2007, 02:48 PM) [snapback]444424[/snapback]

QUOTE(ill-advised @ Oct 19 2007, 02:44 PM) [snapback]444423[/snapback]

myspace is one big fuck up


Yep.


You need to up more pics for the Retardz DVD. So far the ILl Advised one hasn't really caught my attention yet (after seeing the pics).
post #1,808
19 October 2007, 20:29 UTC#1,808
I dont need to up anything yet. when the time comes they will be realesed. I have everything ready and waiting.

ill-advised isnt comeing out untill 'adrenaline rush, one decade & generate damage" is out, so im not going to give anything away for a while.

like I said before you have no idea what happens in most of them scenes as they are only images. (disagree again if you want)
post #1,809
19 October 2007, 20:30 UTC#1,809
QUOTE(BLL_Geaslin @ Oct 19 2007, 02:22 PM) [snapback]444403[/snapback]

Kickass...
I'm definitely gonna order this sometime soon


then send me it
post #1,810
19 October 2007, 22:31 UTC#1,810
QUOTE(ill-advised @ Oct 19 2007, 04:29 PM) [snapback]444442[/snapback]

I dont need to up anything yet. when the time comes they will be realesed. I have everything ready and waiting.

ill-advised isnt comeing out untill 'adrenaline rush, one decade & generate damage" is out, so im not going to give anything away for a while.

like I said before you have no idea what happens in most of them scenes as they are only images. (disagree again if you want)


Yeah dude I can't say I do know whats going on in the scenes, I'm just saying from the scenes them selves I haven't gotten that itch that the Retardz DVD scenes from the old site gave me.

I'm just giving you honest feedback, I'm probably one of, if not the biggest Retardz fan on this site. There is nothing I'd want more than to get all stoked like a 14 year old again on some new Ill Advised pics.
post #1,811
19 October 2007, 22:49 UTC#1,811
I agree with fms, im not getting that same feeling I did when you first released the retardz site and I was like "holy fuck..."
post #1,812
19 October 2007, 23:20 UTC#1,812
wel that might be because ill-advised isnt a "stunt group" maybe?

its a different video project, if you're not into what its going to produce them fair enough I dont expect everyone to like it,

just like if someone didnt like stunts I wouldnt get pissed off when they say they dont like adrenaline rush

that dvd is still coming...so you can see stunts on that one.
post #1,813
19 October 2007, 23:44 UTC#1,813
QUOTE(ill-advised @ Oct 19 2007, 07:20 PM) [snapback]444464[/snapback]

wel that might be because ill-advised isnt a "stunt group" maybe?

its a different video project, if you're not into what its going to produce them fair enough I dont expect everyone to like it,

just like if someone didnt like stunts I wouldnt get pissed off when they say they dont like adrenaline rush

that dvd is still coming...so you can see stunts on that one.


I don't see your point, at all, I'm just saying weather it's stunts or not Ill Advised hasn't grabbed my gonads yet.



post #1,814
19 October 2007, 23:54 UTC#1,814
ok look, your 14yrs old, love stunts. see retardz site when I was strongly promoteing a dvd. it made a mark.

I do a video project that isnt the above. not looking to promote it but while I have a myspace up I screen shot afew clips I have on my pc. you're 18 and could care less.

big difference
post #1,815
20 October 2007, 00:00 UTC#1,815
QUOTE(ill-advised @ Oct 19 2007, 07:54 PM) [snapback]444467[/snapback]

ok look, your 14yrs old, love stunts. see retardz site when I was strongly promoteing a dvd. it made a mark.

I do a video project that isnt the above. not looking to promote it but while I have a myspace up I screen shot afew clips I have on my pc. you're 18 and could care less.

big difference


You constantly promote Ill Advised, to say otherwise would be a bold lie.

The fact it's the only picture in your sig proves my points.

Either way, I'm not saying anything about the quality of Ill Advised, I'm just saying you haven't got my attention yet.

Edit: And it wouldn't have caught my 14 year old attention either.
post #1,816
20 October 2007, 00:18 UTC#1,816
let me correct you again al, I promote ill-advised films as a whole, yes, I agree, I never said I didnt.

we was talking about the dvd was we not? and no I dont heavily try to promote it. this is the first update iv done on it in the 3 years its been in the makeing. and that update was what I could scrap together from my external.

I know what footage I have for it, I know what happens in the footage, if I wanted to let you in on it I would of posted it as soon as it was filmed.

I hope your joking about the comment after your edit!?...it wouldnt of caught your attention at 14......because you was mad about stunt videos....this isnt a stunt video lol...so no you wouldnt of wanted to see it.

if I wanted attention for the dvd yet I would of launched the same method I did for retardz and wait for the bites. but then id get that annoying question all the time "whens the dvd out!?"

id rather get that when its near compleation.....like with a trailer.
post #1,817
20 October 2007, 00:20 UTC#1,817
QUOTE(ill-advised @ Oct 19 2007, 08:18 PM) [snapback]444471[/snapback]

I hope your joking about the comment after your edit!?...it wouldnt of caught your attention at 14......because you was mad about stunt videos....this isnt a stunt video lol...so no you wouldnt of wanted to see it.


Then why am I sending in a stunt for the Ill Advised video if there aren't going to be stunts in there?

I try to seek answers, all I find are more questions :sad:
post #1,818
20 October 2007, 00:25 UTC#1,818
you dont have to send in anything for it.

why is there stunts in movies. does that make them stunt films?

as you ill-advised dvd is a mix of everything. theres naked chicks in it, dont mean its a porno.
post #1,819
20 October 2007, 00:27 UTC#1,819
ABV isn't a stunt DVD. :ohmy:
post #1,820
20 October 2007, 00:29 UTC#1,820
oh is the majority of the AB dvd not stunt based then? ok.
post #1,821
20 October 2007, 00:31 UTC#1,821
QUOTE(ill-advised @ Oct 19 2007, 08:25 PM) [snapback]444473[/snapback]


why is there stunts in movies. does that make them stunt films?

as you ill-advised dvd is a mix of everything. theres naked chicks in it, dont mean its a porno.


So, your telling me, there is stunts in Ill Advised, not having to do with some larger story line but just individual acts of insanity. But it isn't a stunt DVD?

There are stunts in Dude were is my car, but they aren't focused upon, when focus is brought to the stunt so that it's the main focus the DVD then becomes a stunt DVD.

I have crazy meth heads in my DVD as well as fights, but I'd call it more stunt than anything.


QUOTE(yates @ Oct 19 2007, 08:27 PM) [snapback]444474[/snapback]

ABV isn't a stunt DVD. :ohmy:


Neither is No Shame I guess.

I thought I had it all figured out too.

Edit: Ill Advised is a DVD with stunts but a lot of the footage has nothing to do with stunts, so you don't want to classify it only as a stunt DVD even though there will be more than one stunt?

Is that what you trying to say?
post #1,822
20 October 2007, 00:35 UTC#1,822
QUOTE(ill-advised @ Oct 20 2007, 02:29 AM) [snapback]444475[/snapback]

oh is the majority of the AB dvd not stunt based then? ok.


this goes for FMS also...

as from what I understand if the main subject matter can be listed into a group. ie STUNTS

then it becomes the main lable of the dvd.



but hey two americans must be right. and I must be wrong.

edit: trying to say? thats what I have been saying.... :rolleyes:
post #1,823
20 October 2007, 00:38 UTC#1,823
QUOTE(ill-advised @ Oct 19 2007, 08:35 PM) [snapback]444478[/snapback]

but hey two americans must be right. and I must be wrong.


Wouldn't be the first time

External image not preserved — inspect source: http://www.state.nj.us/dep/greenacres/images/washx.gif

Or the second

External image not preserved — inspect source: http://www.ohiohistorycentral.org/images/229.jpg

QUOTE(ill-advised @ Oct 19 2007, 08:35 PM) [snapback]444478[/snapback]

edit: trying to say? thats what I have been saying.... :rolleyes:


No I'm pretty sure I said it.

post #1,824
20 October 2007, 00:45 UTC#1,824
well you looked at the screen shots of footage having nothing to do with stunts (said you didnt like it) and then state it didnt intrest you like a stunt dvd, when I told you over and over it isnt a stunt dvd (the reason why it doesnt have the same effect) you then asked why stunts would be in it aswell if it wasnt a stunt dvd.

like I said, it has naked chicks in it. but it isnt classed as a porno.

Bro-Ken-Down

it will have stunts in it but it isnt classed as a stunt video.




I cant see how hard that was for you to understand mate.
post #1,825
20 October 2007, 01:00 UTC#1,825
QUOTE(ill-advised @ Oct 19 2007, 08:45 PM) [snapback]444480[/snapback]

well you looked at the screen shots of footage having nothing to do with stunts (said you didnt like it) and then state it didnt intrest you like a stunt dvd, when I told you over and over it isnt a stunt dvd (the reason why it doesnt have the same effect) you then asked why stunts would be in it aswell if it wasnt a stunt dvd.

like I said, it has naked chicks in it. but it isnt classed as a porno.

Bro-Ken-Down

it will have stunts in it but it isnt classed as a stunt video.




I cant see how hard that was for you to understand mate.


This one time, I shot a guy.

External image not preserved — inspect source: http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/3474/condomlz0.png

Clip from what I'm now calling "Train wreck show".

Edit: I already regret putting this feat up for the PS gods.
post #1,826
20 October 2007, 02:33 UTC#1,826
QUOTE(Funk Master Shiestorz @ Oct 20 2007, 04:20 AM) [snapback]444472[/snapback]

I try to seek answers, all I find are more questions :sad:

...all I find is....
post #1,827
20 October 2007, 16:53 UTC#1,827
QUOTE(ill-advised @ Oct 19 2007, 09:29 PM) [snapback]444475[/snapback]

oh is the majority of the AB dvd not stunt based then? ok.


Nah, more focused on skating, fights, and other ruckus type shit.
post #1,830
20 October 2007, 20:49 UTC#1,830
Nice setup.