11 September 2005, 20:36 UTC#1
Which is more worth the money?
11 September 2005, 20:39 UTC#2
Original...it's small enough and has a sexy screen and holds more.
11 September 2005, 20:40 UTC#3
Yeah, the mini's definitely aren't worth the money.
11 September 2005, 20:41 UTC#4
QUOTE(skipper @ Sep 11 2005, 02:39 PM)
Original...it's small enough and has a sexy screen and holds more.
[right][snapback]173490[/snapback][/right]
11 September 2005, 20:45 UTC#5
orginials.. now you get it photo and 60gb for like 300 pound
11 September 2005, 20:46 UTC#6
I would say the Original even though iv got a mini
11 September 2005, 21:07 UTC#7
original. for the space. or if u dont need that much space, the nano
11 September 2005, 22:01 UTC#8
QUOTE(skipper @ Sep 11 2005, 08:39 PM)
Original...it's small enough and has a sexy screen and holds more.
[right][snapback]173490[/snapback][/right]
Yup
12 September 2005, 00:42 UTC#9
originals, hold more music, dont come in gay clours, and get me off as well
12 September 2005, 00:46 UTC#10
god damnit... your worse then sam evans quit making polls
12 September 2005, 00:49 UTC#11
has any one gotten an ipod engraved? if so does it look good?
12 September 2005, 01:22 UTC#12
the origional I pod only lasts 18 months
12 September 2005, 07:04 UTC#13
Other iPod - The iRiver.
iPods are for generic ghei feigs, get an iRiver, trust me.
12 September 2005, 09:59 UTC#14
QUOTE(MattG @ Sep 12 2005, 12:46 PM)
god damnit... your worse then sam evans quit making polls
[right][snapback]173633[/snapback][/right]
Thats a bit harsh
12 September 2005, 11:32 UTC#15
I dont own a iOD but if I had the spare cash id get the normal one with photos... or f it was out one that had video on it.
Mini ones are crap really... I thought the whole point of having a iPOD was to have your whole music collection in your hand? a 1-3GB would not do that.
12 September 2005, 16:18 UTC#16
it would for people with smaller music collections.
12 September 2005, 17:35 UTC#17
All ipods suck horse weener.
12 September 2005, 17:41 UTC#18
why do you need something with soo much memory..a few gigs is more than enuf
12 September 2005, 18:41 UTC#19
well I need at least 20gb
12 September 2005, 19:05 UTC#20
Isn't your music collection like only 6gb?
12 September 2005, 19:05 UTC#21
original hands down, larger capacity, better look, better value
12 September 2005, 19:05 UTC#22
QUOTE(Vince @ Sep 12 2005, 06:41 PM)
well I need at least 20gb
[right][snapback]173965[/snapback][/right]
what for?
2 gb's is ennuf for me...
Image file not present in the recovered backup12 September 2005, 19:08 UTC#23
Mine is like 3 gb's max..

12 September 2005, 19:10 UTC#24
I the ipod shuffle is cool, because theres songs you only want to hear sometimes.and theres song you jsut have cravings for, but you have to wait for it to find it. and with such alarge capacity.it could take forever
if I had the money, I would buy the original ipod but I dont think iwould ever use the whole thing
12 September 2005, 19:12 UTC#25
QUOTE(joe_thc @ Sep 12 2005, 08:10 PM)
I the ipod shuffle is cool, because theres songs you only want to hear sometimes.and theres song you jsut have cravings for, but you have to wait for it to find it. and with such alarge capacity.it could take forever
if I had the money, I would buy the original ipod but I dont think iwould ever use the whole thing
[right][snapback]173990[/snapback][/right]
u should get the ipod nano
12 September 2005, 19:12 UTC#26
Your always talking about iPods, lol
12 September 2005, 19:17 UTC#27
yeah, in the ipod thread...
12 September 2005, 21:05 UTC#28
I like my 20gig ipod just the way it is, and by damn was it worth it
12 September 2005, 21:05 UTC#29
original I-pod all day long.
12 September 2005, 21:26 UTC#30
I have the 4gb mini,
im on the computer every night, so I dont mind changing songs if I need to, you get 6 more hours of battery, and its $100 less, so when the battery wears out, your less pissed