11 August 2005, 07:26 UTC#1
There have been lots of talk about wich is better wmv of mpg. I have allways prefed mpg, it plays lights and colors more clear and does not have that pixelated stuff once in a while like wmv. Mpg is also compatible with everything, like linux and macintosh, unlike wmv. People allways complain about the filesize with mpg....
Anyway here is my site promo, twice. One is mpg(5.81mb) and one is wmv(5.78mb). D/L them and watch em and vote on poll, whic is better mpg or wmv.
mpgwmv11 August 2005, 07:29 UTC#2
wmv 4 life yo
11 August 2005, 07:29 UTC#3
links doesnt work for me

plz fix it
11 August 2005, 07:32 UTC#4
link doesnt work 4 me either
11 August 2005, 07:38 UTC#5
QUOTE(FoggyCrossShow @ Aug 11 2005, 08:29 AM)
wmv 4 life yo
[right][snapback]144669[/snapback][/right]
Explain why? There is no reason to like bad quality format that doesnt work with anything.
Links work for me...

11 August 2005, 07:49 UTC#6
Mpg@ 5.47mbWmv@ 4.42mbthe wmv is 1 mb smaller and look at the quality..
I vote wmv
11 August 2005, 07:53 UTC#7
What program and what settings did you use?
11 August 2005, 07:57 UTC#8
sony vegas and 800kbps but wmv conforms to approx 800 un like mpeg wich is exact. hence the smaller file size on the wmv
11 August 2005, 08:02 UTC#9
The wmv looked good, but the mpg didnt really work for me. I think it may depend a lot on what program you use. But as I use Ulead6, Pinnacle9 and WMM, I´d say Pinnacl9´s vcd mpg quality is superior. Ulead doesnt do anything but mpg´s and dv-avi so.... so between
aaah, nevermind. I use mpg and thats it, my cruseade is just stupid. At least I got to post my site promo again

11 August 2005, 08:06 UTC#10
QUOTE(vode @ Aug 11 2005, 04:02 AM)
The wmv looked good, but the mpg didnt really work for me. I think it may depend a lot on what program you use. But as I use Ulead6, Pinnacle9 and WMM, I´d say Pinnacl9´s vcd mpg quality is superior. Ulead doesnt do anything but mpg´s and dv-avi so.... so between
aaah, nevermind. I use mpg and thats it, my cruseade is just stupid. At least I got to post my site promo again

[right][snapback]144689[/snapback][/right]
you have a valad argument but its no differnt than " do you drink coke or pepsi?" people just have differnt opnions..
11 August 2005, 08:14 UTC#11
QUOTE(THC @ Aug 11 2005, 09:06 AM)
QUOTE(vode @ Aug 11 2005, 04:02 AM)
The wmv looked good, but the mpg didnt really work for me. I think it may depend a lot on what program you use. But as I use Ulead6, Pinnacle9 and WMM, I´d say Pinnacl9´s vcd mpg quality is superior. Ulead doesnt do anything but mpg´s and dv-avi so.... so between
aaah, nevermind. I use mpg and thats it, my cruseade is just stupid. At least I got to post my site promo again

[right][snapback]144689[/snapback][/right]
you have a valad argument but its no differnt than " do you drink coke or pepsi?" people just have differnt opnions..
[right][snapback]144692[/snapback][/right]
What the fuck!?!?!?!? HWat are you saying?? Pepsi abso-fucking-lutly!!!!!
Image file not present in the recovered backup11 August 2005, 08:24 UTC#12
I vote wmv.... does anyone know where I can get a converter to .mov?
11 August 2005, 08:27 UTC#13
royal crown cola is tha shit
11 August 2005, 08:29 UTC#14
Mpeg, I used it for prom02 and love the quality.
I love the way Vode's clips are in MPEG and I can really notice the difference, I think the file size is worth it.
11 August 2005, 08:46 UTC#15
And just to add, Everything is more clear. and how cool does mpeg sound. so pro and horney Like Vode.
11 August 2005, 12:41 UTC#16
It's all in context.
WMV for compression and general online stuff.
MPG for everything else

11 August 2005, 12:42 UTC#17
My computer doesn't like MPG's much.
11 August 2005, 13:21 UTC#18
mpg
11 August 2005, 13:25 UTC#19
Vode, your links
NEVER work for me, and again it makes me

11 August 2005, 13:42 UTC#20
When both at full quality MPG, by miles, especially with colours, but the file size of the MPG file to the WMV is enormus,
With a 2mb WMV, and a VCD MPG, the file sizes are about the same, and id have to say .WMV
11 August 2005, 13:56 UTC#21
QUOTE(BaZ_LnN @ Aug 11 2005, 02:42 PM)
When both at full quality MPG, by miles, especially with colours, but the file size of the MPG file to the WMV is enormus,
With a 2mb WMV, and a VCD MPG, the file sizes are about the same, and id have to say .WMV
[right][snapback]144955[/snapback][/right]
Actually 1.5mb wmv the filesize is the same. And you dont really want to release anything with worse quality than that, takes lot of joy to watch poor quality clip.
11 August 2005, 19:58 UTC#22
QUOTE(BaZ_LnN @ Aug 11 2005, 08:42 AM)
When both at full quality MPG, by miles, especially with colours, but the file size of the MPG file to the WMV is enormus,
With a 2mb WMV, and a VCD MPG, the file sizes are about the same, and id have to say .WMV
[right][snapback]144955[/snapback][/right]
11 August 2005, 21:21 UTC#23
Yeah, but its still 1.5mb wmv.
11 August 2005, 21:32 UTC#24
WMV!
11 August 2005, 21:34 UTC#25
im on a mac, so definitely MPG, altho wmv is better for sharing files online.
26 August 2005, 16:44 UTC#26
MPEG, I hate .wmv.
Because of that format, I had to spend an hour modding mplayer on my Linux system, to play a codec officially only supported on Windows systems. *Hiss*
26 August 2005, 17:52 UTC#27
QUOTE(gman @ Aug 26 2005, 06:44 PM)
MPEG, I hate .wmv.
Because of that format, I had to spend an hour modding mplayer on my Linux system, to play a codec officially only supported on Windows systems. *Hiss*
[right][snapback]159886[/snapback][/right]
Yeeeey gman uses Linux just like me! It is not so difficult to have vmw supported. in mplayer But some files will never play, because of DRM, and there are problems with special files, like High Definition wmv playback. And mplayer is not very actively developed anymore. But it still plays back 99 % of what I watch, so it is good enough.
The two above look good, both the mpeg and the wmv. The wmv have much higher resolution (double in both directions). I vote for mpeg, because it is much more compatible.
01 September 2005, 18:31 UTC#28
mpg is good but for the download is better wmv
01 September 2005, 18:31 UTC#29
wmv for online stuff, mpg for higher quality stuff.
01 September 2005, 18:32 UTC#30
QUOTE(ilovedannyboy @ Sep 1 2005, 01:31 PM)
mpg is good but for the download is better wmv
[right][snapback]164709[/snapback][/right]
Welcome