london bombers (page 3)

post #61

30 July 2005, 23:14 UTC#61

dude let there be a civil war .... america needs not to intervene , it has nothing to do with them , let the country take its own toll

atleast that way the us and britain are not vunerable.

if the iraqis wanted the troops there , would they rebel?

Skipper

post #62

30 July 2005, 23:16 UTC#62

QUOTE(Tomm @ Jul 30 2005, 11:14 PM)

dude let there be a civil war .... america needs not to intervene , it has nothing to do with them , let the country take its own toll

atleast that way the us and britain are not vunerable.

if the iraqis wanted the troops there , would they rebel?
[right][snapback]134813[/snapback][/right]

Good points I suppose.

But after leaving them once after the first gulf war and letting sadam carry on , wouldnt doing the same again give some other nutter to run the country, and now maybe want to ( in revenge) amkes weapons to use against the west?

A2Kvideo

post #63

30 July 2005, 23:17 UTC#63

QUOTE(skipper @ Jul 30 2005, 11:09 PM)

QUOTE(A2Kvideo @ Jul 30 2005, 11:05 PM)

QUOTE(skipper @ Jul 30 2005, 11:02 PM)

QUOTE(Tomm @ Jul 30 2005, 10:56 PM)

QUOTE

Well we gana have to agree to disagree, and yeah I do see police having guns to try their best to stop sick arab fuckers blowing us up as a good thing.

what about sick american troops killing innocent iraqis, america started this , 9/11 was not saddam so get the fuck out of that country and ther attcks will stop, they went there for weapons none were found... leave simple

thats the only thing the so called terrorists are fighting for , remeber they always do this for a reason
[right][snapback]134777[/snapback][/right]

If they leave iraq now, there will be a civil war for the power of the country. They cant leave, and if they do leave they cave into wht hte terrorists want, u cant back down an inch with them otherwise next time they 'have a reason' to blow others up, they will.

As I said before, ganted the reason they gave for going to war was bollocks but going to war was the right thing to do, they removed an unstable sick fucker as the leader of the country. Eventually the country will be in a postion to run itself, but its not now.
[right][snapback]134787[/snapback][/right]

They did it in a diry sneaky way, by liying and using a tragety as an excuse...I can explain myself and shit, and come up with some good fucking reasons. I have facts that prove what would of happened if the US never invaded. They would of been better off. But its a long story. And what ever happened to Bin-Laden? Oh yeah, that business relationship with the Bush Family happened.
[right][snapback]134793[/snapback][/right]

Wht facts?
Surely if their based on something that diddnt happen (america not invading) they cant be solid facts, but anyway....wht facts?
[right][snapback]134800[/snapback][/right]

It turns out that Saddam's son Uday was getting ready to overthrow him and kill him and turn the country into some sort of democracy type shit. But the USA invaded and well...they killed the civilians and all that, you know. And the US governement lied to us by saying that they had WMD's, Saddam had ties with Al-Quida all that bullshit. When Saddam and Osama had two completely different beleifs and didn't agree with eachother. Well, thats all I know. But things would be better off. But I'm stressing that I know they are all in on this, things are planned out from 9/11 till know.

A2Kvideo

post #64

30 July 2005, 23:19 UTC#64

QUOTE(Tomm @ Jul 30 2005, 11:14 PM)

dude let there be a civil war .... america needs not to intervene , it has nothing to do with them , let the country take its own toll

atleast that way the us and britain are not vunerable.

if the iraqis wanted the troops there , would they rebel?
[right][snapback]134813[/snapback][/right]

Yes I beleive that the people would of eventually rose up and got the shit done themselves...that usually happens.

Skipper

post #65

30 July 2005, 23:20 UTC#65

QUOTE(A2Kvideo @ Jul 30 2005, 11:17 PM)

QUOTE(skipper @ Jul 30 2005, 11:09 PM)

QUOTE(A2Kvideo @ Jul 30 2005, 11:05 PM)

QUOTE(skipper @ Jul 30 2005, 11:02 PM)

QUOTE(Tomm @ Jul 30 2005, 10:56 PM)

QUOTE

Well we gana have to agree to disagree, and yeah I do see police having guns to try their best to stop sick arab fuckers blowing us up as a good thing.

what about sick american troops killing innocent iraqis, america started this , 9/11 was not saddam so get the fuck out of that country and ther attcks will stop, they went there for weapons none were found... leave simple

thats the only thing the so called terrorists are fighting for , remeber they always do this for a reason
[right][snapback]134777[/snapback][/right]

If they leave iraq now, there will be a civil war for the power of the country. They cant leave, and if they do leave they cave into wht hte terrorists want, u cant back down an inch with them otherwise next time they 'have a reason' to blow others up, they will.

As I said before, ganted the reason they gave for going to war was bollocks but going to war was the right thing to do, they removed an unstable sick fucker as the leader of the country. Eventually the country will be in a postion to run itself, but its not now.
[right][snapback]134787[/snapback][/right]

They did it in a diry sneaky way, by liying and using a tragety as an excuse...I can explain myself and shit, and come up with some good fucking reasons. I have facts that prove what would of happened if the US never invaded. They would of been better off. But its a long story. And what ever happened to Bin-Laden? Oh yeah, that business relationship with the Bush Family happened.
[right][snapback]134793[/snapback][/right]

Wht facts?
Surely if their based on something that diddnt happen (america not invading) they cant be solid facts, but anyway....wht facts?
[right][snapback]134800[/snapback][/right]

It turns out that Saddam's son Uday was getting ready to overthrow him and kill him and turn the country into some sort of democracy type shit. But the USA invaded and well...they killed the civilians and all that, you know. And the US governement lied to us by saying that they had WMD's, Saddam had ties with Al-Quida all that bullshit. When Saddam and Osama had two completely different beleifs and didn't agree with eachother. Well, thats all I know. But things would be better off. But I'm stressing that I know they are all in on this, things are planned out from 9/11 till know.
[right][snapback]134816[/snapback][/right]

lol, and u know this for a fact? just as u know for a fact tht wht we are being told is completely wrong?

Sorry but saying, turns out his son was ganan overthrow him isnt a fact is it?

I may be wrong here, but iraq willingly harbourd the terrorists involved in the 9/11 attacks yeh? maybe not, but tht is wht led the US to belive tht iraw had ties with terrorists.

your facts arnt facts they are ideas and theroys.

tomm

post #66

30 July 2005, 23:21 UTC#66

QUOTE(skipper @ Jul 30 2005, 11:16 PM)

QUOTE(Tomm @ Jul 30 2005, 11:14 PM)

dude let there be a civil war .... america needs not to intervene , it has nothing to do with them , let the country take its own toll

atleast that way the us and britain are not vunerable.

if the iraqis wanted the troops there , would they rebel?
[right][snapback]134813[/snapback][/right]

Good points I suppose.

But after leaving them once after the first gulf war and letting sadam carry on , wouldnt doing the same again give some other nutter to run the country, and now maybe want to ( in revenge) amkes weapons to use against the west?
[right][snapback]134815[/snapback][/right]

yes if the country were to become a dictatorship once more, I guess that the ruler would like to revolt against america, but either way there is no stopping that now. If america stayed out in the first place , then everything would be peacefull and there would be no reason to attack the us

Junkie Kalle

post #67

30 July 2005, 23:22 UTC#67

just all chil the fuck out, no 1 knows what the fuck is honestly hapening,,,its opinion against opinion....

Everythign hapends for a reason

Prays for the lordahhhhhh

A2Kvideo

post #68

30 July 2005, 23:23 UTC#68

QUOTE(skipper @ Jul 30 2005, 11:20 PM)

QUOTE(A2Kvideo @ Jul 30 2005, 11:17 PM)

QUOTE(skipper @ Jul 30 2005, 11:09 PM)

QUOTE(A2Kvideo @ Jul 30 2005, 11:05 PM)

QUOTE(skipper @ Jul 30 2005, 11:02 PM)

QUOTE(Tomm @ Jul 30 2005, 10:56 PM)

QUOTE

Well we gana have to agree to disagree, and yeah I do see police having guns to try their best to stop sick arab fuckers blowing us up as a good thing.

what about sick american troops killing innocent iraqis, america started this , 9/11 was not saddam so get the fuck out of that country and ther attcks will stop, they went there for weapons none were found... leave simple

thats the only thing the so called terrorists are fighting for , remeber they always do this for a reason
[right][snapback]134777[/snapback][/right]

If they leave iraq now, there will be a civil war for the power of the country. They cant leave, and if they do leave they cave into wht hte terrorists want, u cant back down an inch with them otherwise next time they 'have a reason' to blow others up, they will.

As I said before, ganted the reason they gave for going to war was bollocks but going to war was the right thing to do, they removed an unstable sick fucker as the leader of the country. Eventually the country will be in a postion to run itself, but its not now.
[right][snapback]134787[/snapback][/right]

They did it in a diry sneaky way, by liying and using a tragety as an excuse...I can explain myself and shit, and come up with some good fucking reasons. I have facts that prove what would of happened if the US never invaded. They would of been better off. But its a long story. And what ever happened to Bin-Laden? Oh yeah, that business relationship with the Bush Family happened.
[right][snapback]134793[/snapback][/right]

Wht facts?
Surely if their based on something that diddnt happen (america not invading) they cant be solid facts, but anyway....wht facts?
[right][snapback]134800[/snapback][/right]

It turns out that Saddam's son Uday was getting ready to overthrow him and kill him and turn the country into some sort of democracy type shit. But the USA invaded and well...they killed the civilians and all that, you know. And the US governement lied to us by saying that they had WMD's, Saddam had ties with Al-Quida all that bullshit. When Saddam and Osama had two completely different beleifs and didn't agree with eachother. Well, thats all I know. But things would be better off. But I'm stressing that I know they are all in on this, things are planned out from 9/11 till know.
[right][snapback]134816[/snapback][/right]

lol, and u know this for a fact? just as u know for a fact tht wht we are being told is completely wrong?

Sorry but saying, turns out his son was ganan overthrow him isnt a fact is it?

I may be wrong here, but iraq willingly harbourd the terrorists involved in the 9/11 attacks yeh? maybe not, but tht is wht led the US to belive tht iraw had ties with terrorists.

your facts arnt facts they are ideas and theroys.
[right][snapback]134820[/snapback][/right]

Nope, your thinking about the Taliban. The same Taliban that Bush brought to Houston to visit to make people not thing bad of them. And the people that funded Al-Quida were the Saudi Arabians, which have a really good relationship with the Bush Family, mainly George H.W. Bush...the main head of the CIA. Which trained Osama Bin-Laden and Al-Quida in the 80's to fight the Soviets.

Skipper

post #69

30 July 2005, 23:24 UTC#69

QUOTE(Tomm @ Jul 30 2005, 11:21 PM)

QUOTE(skipper @ Jul 30 2005, 11:16 PM)

QUOTE(Tomm @ Jul 30 2005, 11:14 PM)

dude let there be a civil war .... america needs not to intervene , it has nothing to do with them , let the country take its own toll

atleast that way the us and britain are not vunerable.

if the iraqis wanted the troops there , would they rebel?
[right][snapback]134813[/snapback][/right]

Good points I suppose.

But after leaving them once after the first gulf war and letting sadam carry on , wouldnt doing the same again give some other nutter to run the country, and now maybe want to ( in revenge) amkes weapons to use against the west?
[right][snapback]134815[/snapback][/right]

yes if the country were to become a dictatorship once more, I guess that the ruler would like to revolt against america, but either way there is no stopping that now. If america stayed out in the first place , then everything would be peacefull and there would be no reason to attack the us
[right][snapback]134821[/snapback][/right]

There is a way of stopping tht, make sure they get a democaracy and a defence system capable of sustaining itself set up.

And the fact of the matter now is, they did get involved and just by running away will fuck them over in the end even more, cant u see tht?

tomm

post #70

30 July 2005, 23:25 UTC#70

QUOTE(skipper @ Jul 30 2005, 11:24 PM)

QUOTE(Tomm @ Jul 30 2005, 11:21 PM)

QUOTE(skipper @ Jul 30 2005, 11:16 PM)

QUOTE(Tomm @ Jul 30 2005, 11:14 PM)

dude let there be a civil war .... america needs not to intervene , it has nothing to do with them , let the country take its own toll

atleast that way the us and britain are not vunerable.

if the iraqis wanted the troops there , would they rebel?
[right][snapback]134813[/snapback][/right]

Good points I suppose.

But after leaving them once after the first gulf war and letting sadam carry on , wouldnt doing the same again give some other nutter to run the country, and now maybe want to ( in revenge) amkes weapons to use against the west?
[right][snapback]134815[/snapback][/right]

yes if the country were to become a dictatorship once more, I guess that the ruler would like to revolt against america, but either way there is no stopping that now. If america stayed out in the first place , then everything would be peacefull and there would be no reason to attack the us
[right][snapback]134821[/snapback][/right]

There is a way of stopping tht, make sure they get a democaracy and a defence system capable of sustaining itself set up.

And the fact of the matter now is, they did get involved and just by running away will fuck them over in the end even more, cant u see tht?
[right][snapback]134824[/snapback][/right]

if the democrasy is even remotely run by america the people wont stand for it .

Skipper

post #71

30 July 2005, 23:27 UTC#71

QUOTE(Tomm @ Jul 30 2005, 11:25 PM)

QUOTE(skipper @ Jul 30 2005, 11:24 PM)

QUOTE(Tomm @ Jul 30 2005, 11:21 PM)

QUOTE(skipper @ Jul 30 2005, 11:16 PM)

QUOTE(Tomm @ Jul 30 2005, 11:14 PM)

dude let there be a civil war .... america needs not to intervene , it has nothing to do with them , let the country take its own toll

atleast that way the us and britain are not vunerable.

if the iraqis wanted the troops there , would they rebel?
[right][snapback]134813[/snapback][/right]

Good points I suppose.

But after leaving them once after the first gulf war and letting sadam carry on , wouldnt doing the same again give some other nutter to run the country, and now maybe want to ( in revenge) amkes weapons to use against the west?
[right][snapback]134815[/snapback][/right]

yes if the country were to become a dictatorship once more, I guess that the ruler would like to revolt against america, but either way there is no stopping that now. If america stayed out in the first place , then everything would be peacefull and there would be no reason to attack the us
[right][snapback]134821[/snapback][/right]

There is a way of stopping tht, make sure they get a democaracy and a defence system capable of sustaining itself set up.

And the fact of the matter now is, they did get involved and just by running away will fuck them over in the end even more, cant u see tht?
[right][snapback]134824[/snapback][/right]

if the democrasy is even remotely run by america the people wont stand for it .
[right][snapback]134826[/snapback][/right]

Well, im not saying it will be run by american, as I dont truely know wht will go on and is going on. But surely its best for everyone if iraq gets a sustainable democaracy?

A2Kvideo

post #72

30 July 2005, 23:29 UTC#72

QUOTE(A2Kvideo @ Jul 30 2005, 11:23 PM)

QUOTE(skipper @ Jul 30 2005, 11:20 PM)

QUOTE(A2Kvideo @ Jul 30 2005, 11:17 PM)

QUOTE(skipper @ Jul 30 2005, 11:09 PM)

QUOTE(A2Kvideo @ Jul 30 2005, 11:05 PM)

QUOTE(skipper @ Jul 30 2005, 11:02 PM)

QUOTE(Tomm @ Jul 30 2005, 10:56 PM)

QUOTE

Well we gana have to agree to disagree, and yeah I do see police having guns to try their best to stop sick arab fuckers blowing us up as a good thing.

what about sick american troops killing innocent iraqis, america started this , 9/11 was not saddam so get the fuck out of that country and ther attcks will stop, they went there for weapons none were found... leave simple

thats the only thing the so called terrorists are fighting for , remeber they always do this for a reason
[right][snapback]134777[/snapback][/right]

If they leave iraq now, there will be a civil war for the power of the country. They cant leave, and if they do leave they cave into wht hte terrorists want, u cant back down an inch with them otherwise next time they 'have a reason' to blow others up, they will.

As I said before, ganted the reason they gave for going to war was bollocks but going to war was the right thing to do, they removed an unstable sick fucker as the leader of the country. Eventually the country will be in a postion to run itself, but its not now.
[right][snapback]134787[/snapback][/right]

They did it in a diry sneaky way, by liying and using a tragety as an excuse...I can explain myself and shit, and come up with some good fucking reasons. I have facts that prove what would of happened if the US never invaded. They would of been better off. But its a long story. And what ever happened to Bin-Laden? Oh yeah, that business relationship with the Bush Family happened.
[right][snapback]134793[/snapback][/right]

Wht facts?
Surely if their based on something that diddnt happen (america not invading) they cant be solid facts, but anyway....wht facts?
[right][snapback]134800[/snapback][/right]

It turns out that Saddam's son Uday was getting ready to overthrow him and kill him and turn the country into some sort of democracy type shit. But the USA invaded and well...they killed the civilians and all that, you know. And the US governement lied to us by saying that they had WMD's, Saddam had ties with Al-Quida all that bullshit. When Saddam and Osama had two completely different beleifs and didn't agree with eachother. Well, thats all I know. But things would be better off. But I'm stressing that I know they are all in on this, things are planned out from 9/11 till know.
[right][snapback]134816[/snapback][/right]

lol, and u know this for a fact? just as u know for a fact tht wht we are being told is completely wrong?

Sorry but saying, turns out his son was ganan overthrow him isnt a fact is it?

I may be wrong here, but iraq willingly harbourd the terrorists involved in the 9/11 attacks yeh? maybe not, but tht is wht led the US to belive tht iraw had ties with terrorists.

your facts arnt facts they are ideas and theroys.
[right][snapback]134820[/snapback][/right]

Nope, your thinking about the Taliban. The same Taliban that Bush brought to Houston to visit to make people not thing bad of them. And the people that funded Al-Quida were the Saudi Arabians, which have a really good relationship with the Bush Family, mainly George H.W. Bush...the main head of the CIA. Which trained Osama Bin-Laden and Al-Quida in the 80's to fight the Soviets.
[right][snapback]134823[/snapback][/right]

And heres a link for the doc which I found those facts...with Saddam and his son. And all the stuff I just said. Its all documented, with former FBI and CIA agents explaining it. And White House officals talking about it. http://www.truthuncovered.com/

Ding_Dong

post #73

30 July 2005, 23:31 UTC#73

QUOTE(A2Kvideo @ Jul 30 2005, 11:29 PM)

And heres a link for the doc which I found those facts...with Saddam and his son. And all the stuff I just said. Its all documented, with former FBI and CIA agents explaining it. And White House officals talking about it. http://www.truthuncovered.com/
[right][snapback]134834[/snapback][/right]

dude just because its on the internet doesnt mean its facts.

tomm

post #74

30 July 2005, 23:32 UTC#74

QUOTE(skipper @ Jul 30 2005, 11:27 PM)

QUOTE(Tomm @ Jul 30 2005, 11:25 PM)

QUOTE(skipper @ Jul 30 2005, 11:24 PM)

QUOTE(Tomm @ Jul 30 2005, 11:21 PM)

QUOTE(skipper @ Jul 30 2005, 11:16 PM)

QUOTE(Tomm @ Jul 30 2005, 11:14 PM)

dude let there be a civil war .... america needs not to intervene , it has nothing to do with them , let the country take its own toll

atleast that way the us and britain are not vunerable.

if the iraqis wanted the troops there , would they rebel?
[right][snapback]134813[/snapback][/right]

Good points I suppose.

But after leaving them once after the first gulf war and letting sadam carry on , wouldnt doing the same again give some other nutter to run the country, and now maybe want to ( in revenge) amkes weapons to use against the west?
[right][snapback]134815[/snapback][/right]

yes if the country were to become a dictatorship once more, I guess that the ruler would like to revolt against america, but either way there is no stopping that now. If america stayed out in the first place , then everything would be peacefull and there would be no reason to attack the us
[right][snapback]134821[/snapback][/right]

There is a way of stopping tht, make sure they get a democaracy and a defence system capable of sustaining itself set up.

And the fact of the matter now is, they did get involved and just by running away will fuck them over in the end even more, cant u see tht?
[right][snapback]134824[/snapback][/right]

if the democrasy is even remotely run by america the people wont stand for it .
[right][snapback]134826[/snapback][/right]

Well, im not saying it will be run by american, as I dont truely know wht will go on and is going on. But surely its best for everyone if iraq gets a sustainable democaracy?
[right][snapback]134829[/snapback][/right]

yes but I see it highly doubtful thats going to happen

A2Kvideo

post #75

30 July 2005, 23:33 UTC#75

QUOTE(Ding_Dong @ Jul 30 2005, 11:31 PM)

QUOTE(A2Kvideo @ Jul 30 2005, 11:29 PM)

And heres a link for the doc which I found those facts...with Saddam and his son. And all the stuff I just said. Its all documented, with former FBI and CIA agents explaining it. And White House officals talking about it. http://www.truthuncovered.com/
[right][snapback]134834[/snapback][/right]

dude just because its on the internet doesnt mean its facts.
[right][snapback]134836[/snapback][/right]

Its a video documentary and they have the docs.

Ding_Dong

post #76

30 July 2005, 23:37 UTC#76

QUOTE(A2Kvideo @ Jul 30 2005, 11:33 PM)

QUOTE(Ding_Dong @ Jul 30 2005, 11:31 PM)

QUOTE(A2Kvideo @ Jul 30 2005, 11:29 PM)

And heres a link for the doc which I found those facts...with Saddam and his son. And all the stuff I just said. Its all documented, with former FBI and CIA agents explaining it. And White House officals talking about it. http://www.truthuncovered.com/
[right][snapback]134834[/snapback][/right]

dude just because its on the internet doesnt mean its facts.
[right][snapback]134836[/snapback][/right]

Its a video documentary and they have the docs.
[right][snapback]134840[/snapback][/right]

yeah it can still be faked,as everything else

the world is fucked ,what else is new?

Skipper

post #77

30 July 2005, 23:38 UTC#77

QUOTE(A2Kvideo @ Jul 30 2005, 11:33 PM)

QUOTE(Ding_Dong @ Jul 30 2005, 11:31 PM)

QUOTE(A2Kvideo @ Jul 30 2005, 11:29 PM)

And heres a link for the doc which I found those facts...with Saddam and his son. And all the stuff I just said. Its all documented, with former FBI and CIA agents explaining it. And White House officals talking about it. http://www.truthuncovered.com/
[right][snapback]134834[/snapback][/right]

dude just because its on the internet doesnt mean its facts.
[right][snapback]134836[/snapback][/right]

Its a video documentary and they have the docs.
[right][snapback]134840[/snapback][/right]

If the government was doing all these conspiacies to blow shit up and use the attacks against us like u said, u really think they woulld let people talk about this? and release this if it were true?

If they are letting innocents get blown up they would take out the people saying this stuff, surely?

Ding_Dong

post #78

30 July 2005, 23:39 UTC#78

I dont really believe that the "government" is behind every terror act there is,but it wouldnt fucking surprise me

A2Kvideo

post #79

30 July 2005, 23:43 UTC#79

Its not a Police State yet dude. But its getting there and it will be to the point where we wont be able to critisize without getting lockedup or something. But yet, they have the Patriot Act, so I'm probably counted as a terrorist by talking about this crap.

Skipper

post #80

31 July 2005, 00:05 UTC#80

QUOTE(A2Kvideo @ Jul 30 2005, 11:43 PM)

Its not a Police State yet dude. But its getting there and it will be to the point where we wont be able to critisize without getting lockedup or something. But yet, they have the Patriot Act, so I'm probably counted as a terrorist by talking about this crap.
[right][snapback]134863[/snapback][/right]

It will never get that bad. Theres too much political correctness as it is, the terrorists still have rights and shit, its bollocks, they should give up their human rights as soon as they have taken the lives of others by blowing them up.