16 February 2006, 17:24 UTC#2,251
QUOTE(JohnBorDumB @ Feb 16 2006, 07:52 AM) [snapback]284636[/snapback]
meh... Image file not present in the recovered backup needs more work... not quite satisfied yet.
it looked awesome until I clicked on it.. sorry
Image file not present in the recovered backup16 February 2006, 17:28 UTC#2,252
16 February 2006, 19:05 UTC#2,253
I'd take off that outer red glow, and position the 'site coming soon' text in line with the left side of that top banner but further down
17 February 2006, 01:30 UTC#2,254
17 February 2006, 01:47 UTC#2,255
helpful criticism is wanted plz.
17 February 2006, 03:32 UTC#2,256
y knot try givin it some texture?
[attachmentid=4457]
looks good tho
Attachments
railsofsteel1.jpg · 138 KB
Attachment metadata survives, but the file is absent from the recovered server backup.
17 February 2006, 04:30 UTC#2,257
texture killed it, and whats with the centered posts?
17 February 2006, 05:03 UTC#2,258
QUOTE(Adrian Rize @ Feb 16 2006, 11:30 PM) [snapback]285385[/snapback]
texture killed it, and whats with the centered posts?
if anything ruined ther pic it's the weak ass wana be artistic lettering in the sky.. persionaly I think the contrast in the pic is too hars aswell.... I center my posts because I can.
17 February 2006, 07:55 UTC#2,259
QUOTE(THC @ Feb 17 2006, 05:03 AM) [snapback]285398[/snapback]
QUOTE(Adrian Rize @ Feb 16 2006, 11:30 PM) [snapback]285385[/snapback]
texture killed it, and whats with the centered posts?
if anything ruined ther pic it's the weak ass wana be artistic lettering in the sky.
You're wrong.
I really like it man, nice job.
17 February 2006, 09:18 UTC#2,260
QUOTE(xpose @ Feb 16 2006, 07:05 PM) [snapback]285011[/snapback]
I'd take off that outer red glow, and position the 'site coming soon' text in line with the left side of that top banner but further down
yeah, ill sorted it out a bit better later (just wanted a quick holding page as the domain name took 5 seconds instead of the normal 24 hours)
17 February 2006, 12:23 UTC#2,262
QUOTE(THC @ Feb 17 2006, 03:32 AM) [snapback]285353[/snapback]
y knot try givin it some texture?
[attachmentid=4457]
looks good tho
Looks worse with the texture man.
Nice one adrian.
17 February 2006, 12:32 UTC#2,263
thanks skipper, I thought the same thing about the texture..
17 February 2006, 12:33 UTC#2,264
Try using a texture but puttin it on less opacity, and not all the whole image, like just on some bits, might look good.
17 February 2006, 14:10 UTC#2,265
QUOTE(Mono @ Feb 17 2006, 02:55 AM) [snapback]285427[/snapback]
QUOTE(THC @ Feb 17 2006, 05:03 AM) [snapback]285398[/snapback]
QUOTE(Adrian Rize @ Feb 16 2006, 11:30 PM) [snapback]285385[/snapback]
texture killed it, and whats with the centered posts?
if anything ruined ther pic it's the weak ass wana be artistic lettering in the sky.
You're wrong.
I really like it man, nice job.
LOL!! only reason you even posted here is because you wanted start shit with me mono... grow up dude seriously.. now im gunna go check my myspace...
Image file not present in the recovered backup17 February 2006, 15:19 UTC#2,266
I updated my sig, not sure if it looks better or worse now
but meh who cares
17 February 2006, 16:50 UTC#2,267
17 February 2006, 16:55 UTC#2,268
I love it all except the font annnnd the black border box.
17 February 2006, 20:18 UTC#2,269
re-did some stuff... not sure if I like the rays like that or not... Image file not present in the recovered backup
Attachments
green.jpg · 133 KB
Attachment metadata survives, but the file is absent from the recovered server backup.
17 February 2006, 20:28 UTC#2,270
It hurts my eyes, sorry man.
18 February 2006, 03:21 UTC#2,271
John, those rays are bad, dont do what everyone is doing atm using rays, its just getting repetitive now...
Do something else with the bg, and the popular kid, same with you take the rays and birds out and try something original with the sky...
18 February 2006, 03:35 UTC#2,272
QUOTE(JohnBorDumB @ Feb 18 2006, 09:18 AM) [snapback]285889[/snapback]
re-did some stuff... not sure if I like the rays like that or not... Image file not present in the recovered backup
Haha.
19 February 2006, 19:53 UTC#2,273
19 February 2006, 19:58 UTC#2,274
QUOTE(xpose @ Feb 19 2006, 07:53 PM) [snapback]286925[/snapback]
Remix of a previous piece:
Original size approx 3500 x 4500 px
Hawwwwt, you should write some tuts man, some of your work is truley amazing
19 February 2006, 23:49 UTC#2,275
Thanks womp, I'll write some tuts on a few things if I have time, just not a tut on creating a whole image!
19 February 2006, 23:53 UTC#2,276
That was amazing man. I love that.
20 February 2006, 05:09 UTC#2,278
QUOTE(xpose @ Feb 19 2006, 07:53 PM) [snapback]286925[/snapback]
Good stuff dude, I love it.
20 February 2006, 05:15 UTC#2,279
QUOTE(Chip @ Feb 20 2006, 01:09 AM) [snapback]287225[/snapback]
QUOTE(xpose @ Feb 19 2006, 07:53 PM) [snapback]286925[/snapback]
Good stuff dude, I love it.
I must agree looksvery Intuitive. Nice Color vibe. and Very Cleche
20 February 2006, 05:46 UTC#2,280
QUOTE
Steve' date='Feb 20 2006, 06:15 PM' post='287231']
I must agree looksvery Intuitive. Nice Color vibe. and Very Cleche
YOU ARE SO FUCKING DUMB IT'S NOT EVEN FUNNY.
