Read-only historical archive Reconstructed community archive · captured 17 November 2010

Forum index / Photoshop, Editing & Design / Show off your Work

Show off your Work

5,289 posts · page 112 of 177

made
post #3,331
08 June 2006, 19:50 UTC#3,331
My twin!
John
post #3,333
10 June 2006, 10:10 UTC#3,333
nice work man but the banner at the top seems a bit too plain too be honest
cIRca
post #3,334
10 June 2006, 11:57 UTC#3,334
And the text at the bottom is a wee bit too big. Should be centred when it gets shrunk. ;)
sylo
post #3,337
12 June 2006, 20:20 UTC#3,337
Thanks
Thanks
and
NO :D
<3
benCKa
post #3,338
13 June 2006, 10:12 UTC#3,338
The second one is nice. The first one looks a little too ordinary for me.
sylo
post #3,339
13 June 2006, 10:17 UTC#3,339
lol thanks man
the first one is just an enter page so I tried to keep it simple
FV Straton
post #3,340
18 June 2006, 03:39 UTC#3,340
this is my first decent photoshop try, im really happy with it.
Attachments
jaredsbackground.gif · 409 KB
Attachment metadata survives, but the file is absent from the recovered server backup.
Word
post #3,341
18 June 2006, 03:44 UTC#3,341
Its allright lay off the brushes and you'll get better results, nice for a first playaround though.... mine was way worse.
made
post #3,343
18 June 2006, 14:48 UTC#3,343
Nice work Zaid. :D
Adem
post #3,344
18 June 2006, 15:04 UTC#3,344
I actually like it, but I never like text tho in pieces unless it's small watermark in the corner. or it's part of the work, and not just thrown in trying to explain the piece.
sylo
post #3,346
18 June 2006, 22:12 UTC#3,346
QUOTE(x__made @ Jun 18 2006, 03:48 PM) [snapback]349306[/snapback]

Nice work Zaid. :D

Thanks man :D

QUOTE(Adem @ Jun 18 2006, 04:04 PM) [snapback]349312[/snapback]

I actually like it, but I never like text tho in pieces unless it's small watermark in the corner. or it's part of the work, and not just thrown in trying to explain the piece.


whos bit u talking about?





Tomm - Not your best but still its good.
tomm
post #3,347
18 June 2006, 22:15 UTC#3,347
QUOTE(sylo @ Jun 18 2006, 11:12 PM) [snapback]349499[/snapback]

QUOTE(x__made @ Jun 18 2006, 03:48 PM) [snapback]349306[/snapback]

Nice work Zaid. :D

Thanks man :D

QUOTE(Adem @ Jun 18 2006, 04:04 PM) [snapback]349312[/snapback]

I actually like it, but I never like text tho in pieces unless it's small watermark in the corner. or it's part of the work, and not just thrown in trying to explain the piece.


whos bit u talking about?





Tomm - Not your best but still its good.


I agree zaid, im doing a recall as we speak :) needs alot of work still.
made
post #3,348
18 June 2006, 22:56 UTC#3,348
QUOTE(sylo @ Jun 18 2006, 11:12 PM) [snapback]349499[/snapback]

QUOTE(x__made @ Jun 18 2006, 03:48 PM) [snapback]349306[/snapback]

Nice work Zaid. :D

Thanks man :D

Tomm - Not your best but still its good.

Haha I actually thought Tomms work was yours. Sorry.
John
post #3,349
18 June 2006, 23:02 UTC#3,349
this is the first real thing I have made in flash :) I'm quite pleased with it click
iammarcmason
post #3,350
18 June 2006, 23:08 UTC#3,350
never mind..... checking it out now

EDIT:


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA thats fuckin made me laugh hard
Karl
post #3,351
19 June 2006, 00:14 UTC#3,351
funny!
Mono
post #3,352
19 June 2006, 04:54 UTC#3,352
haha nice one John.
Scott
post #3,353
19 June 2006, 05:21 UTC#3,353
QUOTE(John @ Jun 18 2006, 11:02 PM) [snapback]349512[/snapback]

this is the first real thing I have made in flash :) I'm quite pleased with it click


haha :laugh:
iammarcmason
post #3,355
19 June 2006, 08:49 UTC#3,355
looks familiar for some reason ( and not just from the other page..) anyway I like it. looks like a pro banner =]

good work
Adem
post #3,356
19 June 2006, 10:58 UTC#3,356
QUOTE(sylo @ Jun 18 2006, 06:12 PM) [snapback]349499[/snapback]

whos bit u talking about?


not yours that's for sure. mainly because yours in about 7 posts up from other people who have posted stuff. haha and not tomms best work? I think that piece is unique. nothing I've seen on here before. everyone usually overuses techniques on the forum. just lose the text.
tomm
post #3,357
19 June 2006, 11:11 UTC#3,357
QUOTE(Adem @ Jun 19 2006, 11:58 AM) [snapback]349688[/snapback]

QUOTE(sylo @ Jun 18 2006, 06:12 PM) [snapback]349499[/snapback]

whos bit u talking about?


not yours that's for sure. mainly because yours in about 7 posts up from other people who have posted stuff. haha and not tomms best work? I think that piece is unique. nothing I've seen on here before. everyone usually overuses techniques on the forum. just lose the text.


Why thank you squire :)
yatesex
post #3,359
19 June 2006, 18:38 UTC#3,359
post the stock photos, Im bored...just wanna see what you started from.