Forum index / News / Banlist

Banlist

134 posts · page 1 of 5

post #1
04 July 2005, 19:56 UTC#1
I decided to make a banlist of people who deserve their access to these forums revoked. Fuck any "free speach" preaching.

Today we have a record 2 members;

Anderson
Brewed

Have both been banned for derogitory posts and causing trouble.


All future bans will be added to this list. All brewed topics will be deleted as they are illiterate
post #2
04 July 2005, 19:56 UTC#2
You go G

I would hope these are ip bans not just name bans?
post #3
04 July 2005, 19:57 UTC#3
Ahh damn. I was gonna have fun fucking with the brewed dude.
post #4
04 July 2005, 19:58 UTC#4
QUOTE(JCM @ Jul 4 2005, 09:57 PM)
Ahh damn.  I was gonna have fun fucking with the brewed dude.
[right][snapback]116043[/snapback][/right]


Yeah, he was an idiot anyway. I'm sure the quality of posts will now improve back to their previous state
post #5
04 July 2005, 19:59 UTC#5
yeah every member that deserves to have access revoked will be IP banned.
post #6
04 July 2005, 19:59 UTC#6
QUOTE(JCM @ Jul 4 2005, 07:57 PM)
Ahh damn.  I was gonna have fun fucking with the brewed dude.
[right][snapback]116043[/snapback][/right]


Personally I dont think it was his fault and he was victimied because of his appearence.

But I guess people were getting pissed at him , so I is a good idea
post #7
04 July 2005, 20:00 UTC#7
Hmmm, I'm not sure if banning breWed was totally fair. He was provoked a lot by Anderson, who I feel probably should be banned as his posts are usually pretty fucking harsh. Yes his spelling was poor, but he could have had dsylexia or something, you never know.
Just my 2 cents.
post #8
04 July 2005, 20:01 UTC#8
Dude ban "Deapheat" and "fuck face" and "Evil-Tom" have you seen there posts blink.gif
post #9
04 July 2005, 20:02 UTC#9
yeah, I would'nt blame it all on him, he was be provoked, but he was also provoking others slightly. When they mature they may be given another chance.
post #10
04 July 2005, 20:02 UTC#10
He admitted he couldn't be bothered typing properly. He carried on bitching, and told Tomm to lick his armpits when he was standing up for him. I don't want to tolerate retards anymore, really..its no shame. All his topics were bollocks
post #11
04 July 2005, 20:02 UTC#11
QUOTE(urban_ben @ Jul 4 2005, 08:01 PM)
Dude ban "Deapheat" and "fuck  face" and "Evil-Tom" have you seen there posts  blink.gif
[right][snapback]116050[/snapback][/right]

Very true.
post #12
04 July 2005, 20:02 UTC#12
QUOTE(Tomm @ Jul 4 2005, 07:59 PM)
QUOTE(JCM @ Jul 4 2005, 07:57 PM)
Ahh damn.  I was gonna have fun fucking with the brewed dude.
[right][snapback]116043[/snapback][/right]


Personally I dont think it was his fault and he was victimied because of his appearence.

But I guess people were getting pissed at him , so I is a good idea
[right][snapback]116047[/snapback][/right]

That's what you get for posting a picture of yourself with makeup on over the internet. This just in, dressing like a dumbass does not make you "punk" or "hardcore".
post #13
04 July 2005, 20:03 UTC#13
QUOTE(gman @ Jul 4 2005, 08:02 PM)
He admitted he couldn't be bothered typing properly. He carried on bitching, and told Tomm to lick his armpits when he wast standing up for him. I don't want to tolerate retards anymore, really..its no shame. All his topics were bollocks
[right][snapback]116054[/snapback][/right]


Bwahahah he speaks the truth. Thanks for stcking up for me baby
post #14
04 July 2005, 20:03 UTC#14
realease anderson!!!!!1111
post #15
04 July 2005, 20:04 UTC#15
QUOTE(JCM @ Jul 4 2005, 10:02 PM)
That's what you get for posting a picture of yourself with makeup on over the internet.  This just in, dressing like a dumbass does not make you "punk" or "hardcore".
[right][snapback]116058[/snapback][/right]


Word bro, no one can walk into a job or on the street like that, so why should it be accepted here? biggrin.gif
post #16
04 July 2005, 20:04 UTC#16
QUOTE(JCM @ Jul 4 2005, 09:02 PM)
QUOTE(Tomm @ Jul 4 2005, 07:59 PM)
QUOTE(JCM @ Jul 4 2005, 07:57 PM)
Ahh damn.  I was gonna have fun fucking with the brewed dude.
[right][snapback]116043[/snapback][/right]


Personally I dont think it was his fault and he was victimied because of his appearence.

But I guess people were getting pissed at him , so I is a good idea
[right][snapback]116047[/snapback][/right]

That's what you get for posting a picture of yourself with makeup on over the internet. This just in, dressing like a dumbass does not make you "punk" or "hardcore".
[right][snapback]116058[/snapback][/right]

It is his choice how he decides to dress. Why should that be a factor? So he wares make up round his eyes. So do many famous bands, would that stop you liking there music? If so that is very narrow minded. Lets just put all this behind us and return to how it was before these degrading posts.
post #17
04 July 2005, 20:05 UTC#17
Listen to the man
post #18
04 July 2005, 20:06 UTC#18
How long are they going to be banned for?
post #19
04 July 2005, 20:06 UTC#19
QUOTE(MADE @ Jul 4 2005, 08:04 PM)
QUOTE(JCM @ Jul 4 2005, 09:02 PM)
QUOTE(Tomm @ Jul 4 2005, 07:59 PM)
QUOTE(JCM @ Jul 4 2005, 07:57 PM)
Ahh damn.  I was gonna have fun fucking with the brewed dude.
[right][snapback]116043[/snapback][/right]


Personally I dont think it was his fault and he was victimied because of his appearence.

But I guess people were getting pissed at him , so I is a good idea
[right][snapback]116047[/snapback][/right]

That's what you get for posting a picture of yourself with makeup on over the internet. This just in, dressing like a dumbass does not make you "punk" or "hardcore".
[right][snapback]116058[/snapback][/right]

It is his choice how he decides to dress. Why should that be a factor? So he wares make up round his eyes. So do many famous bands, would that stop you liking there music? If so that is very narrow minded. Lets just put all this behind us and return to how it was before these degrading posts.
[right][snapback]116065[/snapback][/right]

If he really liked how he dressed he wouldn't have gotten mad when we made fun of him.
post #20
04 July 2005, 20:07 UTC#20
QUOTE(MADE @ Jul 4 2005, 08:04 PM)
QUOTE(JCM @ Jul 4 2005, 09:02 PM)
QUOTE(Tomm @ Jul 4 2005, 07:59 PM)
QUOTE(JCM @ Jul 4 2005, 07:57 PM)
Ahh damn.  I was gonna have fun fucking with the brewed dude.
[right][snapback]116043[/snapback][/right]


Personally I dont think it was his fault and he was victimied because of his appearence.

But I guess people were getting pissed at him , so I is a good idea
[right][snapback]116047[/snapback][/right]

That's what you get for posting a picture of yourself with makeup on over the internet. This just in, dressing like a dumbass does not make you "punk" or "hardcore".
[right][snapback]116058[/snapback][/right]

It is his choice how he decides to dress. Why should that be a factor? So he wares make up round his eyes. So do many famous bands, would that stop you liking there music? If so that is very narrow minded. Lets just put all this behind us and return to how it was before these degrading posts.
[right][snapback]116065[/snapback][/right]


yeah I guess your right but it pisses me off whenever I go around my town and I see people wearing make up just because "cool bands" do it, and usaually the people that wear it act all deep and shit.
post #21
04 July 2005, 20:08 UTC#21
QUOTE(JCM @ Jul 4 2005, 09:06 PM)
If he really liked how he dressed he wouldn't have gotten mad when we made fun of him.
[right][snapback]116069[/snapback][/right]

But there was no need to make fun of him.
post #22
04 July 2005, 20:09 UTC#22
I'm on Matts side here, I think that victimising someone because they look different is just sick.

post #23
04 July 2005, 20:10 UTC#23
that kid was fine with me but he was gettin all mad when I told him he should correct his spellin cause I couldent read anything he wrote but then he started gettin all mad and braggin about how good he doing and sayin he owns us cause he has his dvd in sale at stores
post #24
04 July 2005, 20:10 UTC#24
QUOTE(MADE @ Jul 4 2005, 08:08 PM)
QUOTE(JCM @ Jul 4 2005, 09:06 PM)
If he really liked how he dressed he wouldn't have gotten mad when we made fun of him.
[right][snapback]116069[/snapback][/right]

But there was no need to make fun of him.
[right][snapback]116072[/snapback][/right]

You gotta understand it's a message board dude, I understand where you are coming from to some extent, but I think most of us were just teasing him.
post #25
04 July 2005, 20:11 UTC#25
Anyway, back to topic guys. We don't want anything like this again so lets get back to normal.

No hard feelings guys.
post #26
04 July 2005, 20:12 UTC#26
Some people need to take jokes a little more lightly, sure he looked like a fag, but people were teasing, I for one couldn't give a shit..his life.

Regardless, he got banned for his stupid posts, not for how he looks.
post #27
04 July 2005, 20:12 UTC#27
I didn't like the way breWed was saying, "yeahs I's cant helps it if my edtng and vidos are better than most ore all groups here."
post #28
04 July 2005, 20:19 UTC#28
QUOTE(gman @ Jul 4 2005, 08:12 PM)
Some people need to take jokes a little more lightly, sure he looked like a fag, but people were teasing, I for one couldn't give a shit..his life.

Regardless, he got banned for his stupid posts, not for how he looks.
[right][snapback]116081[/snapback][/right]


Fair enough
post #29
04 July 2005, 20:21 UTC#29
Free Anderson!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
post #30
04 July 2005, 20:22 UTC#30
Good move, gman.