Forum index / General Chat / Wacko Jacko

Wacko Jacko

24 posts · page 1 of 1

post #1
15 June 2005, 19:36 UTC#1
I want to know how much he paid the Jury for them to let him get away with 10 charges Image file not present in the recovered backup
post #2
15 June 2005, 19:38 UTC#2
o my god...me too!!! I was just wondeign that....the melting peado!!
post #3
15 June 2005, 19:42 UTC#3
I'm sure if that was anyone else they would've been castrated that's what pisses me off Image file not present in the recovered backup
post #4
15 June 2005, 19:49 UTC#4
I actually dont reckon he did it..

They would get soemthing like that wrong.. even though there americans..
post #5
15 June 2005, 19:57 UTC#5
QUOTE(Matt M @ Jun 15 2005, 07:49 PM)
I actually dont reckon he did it..

They would get soemthing like that wrong.. even though there americans..
[right][snapback]99322[/snapback][/right]

He shared a bed with other people's children this whole thing about him being like a child is a big cover up for the fact he abuses children
post #6
15 June 2005, 20:02 UTC#6
I think that there is alot of evidence, but not conclusive. the media hypes things up ten times more, so when we hear them all we hear is aload of translated bullshit. but yes, I think from what has been said about him he should be charged with something, I mean there are 50 million different laws and shit out there!
post #7
15 June 2005, 20:17 UTC#7
nm - wont let me attach image Image file not present in the recovered backup
post #8
15 June 2005, 20:28 UTC#8
Time to preach biggrin.gif

Whether Jacko is guilty or not, the entire situation is made 100x worse by the media, this sort of thing happens everyday, but Jacko is seen as the bad guy as he is a star, so it makes fantastic headlines.

Personally, I have mixed feelings if he did it or not, I mean common..he wouldn't be so stupid to perform any sexual acts on a kid when he is a star and knows exactly what the consequences could be. Furthermore, just look at the guy..you can tell he aint right, and he may see having children in his bed as normal. The facts that don't add up are that he gave children alcohol and had loads of child posters on his wall. But again this is inconclusive evidence, so they can't convict him with out enough evidence anyway, therefore he didn't have to pay anyone to be let free
post #9
15 June 2005, 20:49 UTC#9
I think he did it.

I hope he dies on a limo ride home.
post #10
15 June 2005, 21:30 UTC#10
His cool, like pedari biggrin.gif
post #11
15 June 2005, 21:33 UTC#11
man I want to blow some of his shit up, or spray pain a pic of a naked kid on his neverland gate
post #12
15 June 2005, 21:43 UTC#12
its obvious he was guilty, though the evidance in the prosecution was unfounded and circumstantial so they couldn't find him guilty. I mean who the fuck thinks it's normal for a middle aged man to share a bed with lil kids?

gavin arvizo is set to take him through the civil courts for big bucks.
post #13
15 June 2005, 21:45 UTC#13
judge judy would have found him guilty, and then would have yelled at him

dude that would kick so much ass
post #14
15 June 2005, 21:47 UTC#14
I quite fancy being a lawyer or judge...need to be a smart fucker in school though.
post #15
15 June 2005, 21:53 UTC#15
Ok,well everyone know this shit was played out. Who the fuck in there right mind lets there kid spend the night with a rich CHILD lover, fucking money hungry parents thats the fuck who. They knew someone that looked that retardely ugly with money they could just say o well he jacked off my kid then gave me millions of dollars to say nothin happened but fuck im gonna sue him for some more money cause my son needs a but load of money to buy a new penis that michael didnt touch. FUCK HE ISNT GUILTY THE FUCKER IS JUST WEIRD AND IS CRAZED IN THE HEAD CAUSE HIS DAD NEVER LET HIM HAVE CHILDHOOD CAUSE HE GOT FUCKED UP THE ASS WITH MUSIC. and money
post #16
15 June 2005, 22:18 UTC#16
QUOTE(Callum C.R @ Jun 15 2005, 07:36 PM)
I want to know how much he paid the Jury for them to let him get away with 10 charges Image file not present in the recovered backup
[right][snapback]99303[/snapback][/right]


I think it has to do with money... lately in the US Justice System it seems if you have money you can get away with murder (OJ) or being a molester (MJ).
post #17
15 June 2005, 22:23 UTC#17
one of the reasons I think jackson won, is because the chick that was the mother of the victom, was continually snapping her fingers at the jury, tellin them, "he did it and you know it" and "you will find him guilty" and shit. She was trying to like control the jury. But I think that could have swayed the jury that, she was lying because she was like commanding them. I dunno, its just my opinion.
post #18
15 June 2005, 22:34 UTC#18
maybe he offered them all free tickets to his neverland park thing...and free anul sex.
post #19
15 June 2005, 23:03 UTC#19
The problem was the jury think he is guilty of something but with all the cases there was not enough 100% evidence. And if they are slightly not sure then they drop them since they all have to agree
post #20
15 June 2005, 23:18 UTC#20
personally...I THINK THE FUKER DID IT!
post #21
16 June 2005, 15:46 UTC#21
I thought he was innocent all along, and a few people just thought that they'd take of a situation that could get them, alot of money, I bet if he was guilty the accusers would have just asked for a huge sum of money, and then drop the charges, and even if he was guilty, he would have paid someone to get him out, so either way he wasn't going to serve major jailtime..............phew, rant over.
post #22
17 June 2005, 02:24 UTC#22
guh....I'm just glad I don't have to watch any more Jacko crap on TV.
post #23
17 June 2005, 11:24 UTC#23
I fucking hate him I was hoping he went down he must have paid a heffty sum
post #24
17 June 2005, 22:44 UTC#24
Fuckface you even part of a group by the way??