Anyone whos good with lenses

I need another new fisheye lens, but I came across this one http://cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewIt...7520975361&rd=1 which is a 0.22x instead of the .3x semi I was orginally going to get. I don't know it the distortion on this would be too extreme and just gay or if I should give it a shot, because I only want to buy one lens. give me a whats up if you have a clue, thanks

seriously fuck, im ordering one tomorrow, I need help ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh!~even if you dont know anything fuckin say something

I think it looks pretty gay not zoomed in at all, but zoomed in it looks alright.

wouldn't get it

if you got the money get one of the pro ones, unless you like the black circle, but that brand is sometimes crooked I got one and it was

but if it's the only one that will fit you cam then go for it

I like raynox qc3030, though its a snap on its cheap. Search google images for comparing.

thanks

alright I decided not to get that .22x but now I cant really figure out the difference between these two or which one I should get, I don't really care about price as much as quality, any ideas:

THIS ONE

or

NUMBER 2

number 2

any big reason?

a better lense than the other, like a pro lense

yeh, I would get number two- looks alot better

Bit strange... I cant see the model number? I see both are Raynox wich is good, but I cant find any comparison pictures with out the number so I cant tell what effects they will make.

But both are x.3... but then the other is classified as semi-fisheye and another just a fisheye. So I dont know if there is big difference or not in them. Semi-fisheyes dont usually have any vingnetion, normal fisheyes have. But effect with same multiplier are usually very much the same.

I cant say anything for a fact, try to find comparison pictures (what it looks like without and with the lens)

But from the look of the lens I would say the first one is a snap on (see the snaps on the side of it) The other one isnt.