Forum index / General Chat / Welcome to Dot XXX

Welcome to Dot XXX

19 posts · page 1 of 1

post #1
04 June 2005, 07:38 UTC#1
Ok for a long time now ive had this idea.

As the net is full of porn, and I see it every day (if I’m looking for it or not) and I know its got a lot worse since I was a kid, So I can only assume 1000's of kids are seeing porn everyday when there not even looking for it.

One of the main reasons is that porn is spilling onto all site, such as geocities, and all other free web space holders..

So my idea was to make a new domain. As we already have .COM and .CO.UK etc they should make a .XXX. They should then make all porn site have to use a .XXX domain. If a porn site is found on a .co.uk or com etc then it would be closed down and they get a fine. Then all browses can just have a option to block all .XXX domains and that will be the end of young eyes seeing porn.

I know people will still upload porn to .co.uk’s but at least it’s a step in the right direction.

As I said ive had this idea for a year now, but 2 days ago I found out they are now bringing out a .XXX domin

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4602449.stm

But now they are kicking off, as all its gana do is give the ownes of porn sites some sweet new domains, but they can still use .com as well

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4606125.stm


I just wanted to know what you all thought about this

post #2
04 June 2005, 07:58 UTC#2
I'm with you on this one. Now that I can legally visit porn sites, I say ban them from minors biggrin.gif
post #3
04 June 2005, 08:05 UTC#3
QUOTE(benCKa @ Jun 4 2005, 07:58 AM)
I'm with you on this one. Now that I can legally visit porn sites, I say ban them from minors biggrin.gif
[right][snapback]92887[/snapback][/right]


so why didnt you vote for "There is no point of a .XXX unless they force porn site onto it" ? lol


Can some one change the second option from "im for the .XXX domain woooooooo" to "im for.XXX even if they dont force porn site onto it"
post #4
04 June 2005, 08:08 UTC#4
Cause if they would all be .xxx, they would be easier to block from minors just as you said

Image file not present in the recovered backup
post #5
04 June 2005, 08:15 UTC#5
OK, but you there is 2 things
1) .XXX and force ALL porn onto it
2) .XXX but dont force them into it

post #6
04 June 2005, 08:44 UTC#6
Force, easyer to find the true porn then !!
post #7
04 June 2005, 08:48 UTC#7
gotta find that hat..
post #8
04 June 2005, 08:49 UTC#8
^ I LOVE THAT VODKA PICTURE
post #9
04 June 2005, 09:34 UTC#9
me and Gaz were talking about it afew days ago. Buying some of them would earn ya some cash.
post #10
04 June 2005, 10:15 UTC#10
I think it's a good idea, if it does eventually lead to all porn sites having .xxx a .com or anything else.
post #11
04 June 2005, 10:28 UTC#11
yeah I agree. If it did it would be more easy to stop opups and unwanted stuff.

But I am sure it will happen anyway.... They always get around it.
post #12
04 June 2005, 11:35 UTC#12
im with you although I voted I lost my hat
post #13
04 June 2005, 13:13 UTC#13
im for it instead of remembering wether a site was .org .co.uk .com etc now I know it is .xxx I can masterbate so much easier that way Image file not present in the recovered backup
post #14
04 June 2005, 14:02 UTC#14
lol. I think its also a way to get more cash outa porn... but yeah think of the time you would save... or not save :P
post #15
04 June 2005, 15:54 UTC#15
yeah but what happens when a site that does not have porn on it like hgf but then someone post a naughty picture should hgf be fined for it.............I dont think so............I like the idea but I dont think sites should get fined for it!!!!! I mean if they are paying for it they should be able to put whatever they want on it.
post #16
04 June 2005, 16:40 UTC#16
I think its if its a porn site.... if what your saying happened it would be very hard for the to even put adds online
post #17
04 June 2005, 16:55 UTC#17
ok ok ok so if its a site for porn and porn only right???? But what if a forum had a porn section that people post in???
post #18
04 June 2005, 17:06 UTC#18
I dont see why not... or 80% of sites would be fined :P

But its a point that should be made to them
post #19
04 June 2005, 20:07 UTC#19
iu think thats a good idea, you run into it a lot when your not even searching for it.