post #1
22 July 2009, 04:54 UTC#1
I shot earlier, easy on me, still got alot to learn on the DVX.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HzrDqb-g4o
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HzrDqb-g4o
Forum index / Sport / Lil Clip
Lil Clip
18 posts · page 1 of 1
post #2
22 July 2009, 04:58 UTC#2
cool
post #3
22 July 2009, 05:03 UTC#3
Yes I colored corrected, normal is to lame I think. I fucked up the aspect so bad, shot it in 16:9 
and 24pa with a high shutter speed, which I probably shouldn't have but lol oh well
super noob
and 24pa with a high shutter speed, which I probably shouldn't have but lol oh wellsuper noob
post #4
22 July 2009, 05:10 UTC#4
'sall good
post #5
22 July 2009, 13:46 UTC#5
still a nice clip
post #6
22 July 2009, 16:29 UTC#6
High shutter speed is way to go when filming fast moving objects e.g skating. utube is jerky for me so I couldnt see if using the 24p caused some flckering, but I doubt it. So I think you used well your camera.
The color correction is doen afterwards?
The color correction is doen afterwards?
post #7
22 July 2009, 17:12 UTC#7
Yes color correcting was in post, looks a tad warm with no CC, and 24pa was not neccessary because the high shutter pretty much cancels any type of 24p motion effect, I think.
Vode, Ryan and Webb Image file not present in the recovered backup Don't be homos
Vode, Ryan and Webb Image file not present in the recovered backup Don't be homos
post #8
22 July 2009, 22:24 UTC#8
Looked good.
post #9
23 July 2009, 02:59 UTC#9
QUOTE(Mr. Brown @ Jul 22 2009, 06:24 PM) [snapback]554438[/snapback]
smells good.
post #10
23 July 2009, 14:58 UTC#10
QUOTE(Slavin @ Jul 23 2009, 04:59 AM) [snapback]554449[/snapback]
QUOTE(Mr. Brown @ Jul 22 2009, 06:24 PM) [snapback]554438[/snapback]
kjyfku,tdlutcx. Image file not present in the recovered backup
post #11
23 July 2009, 15:46 UTC#11
QUOTE(imre_tse @ Jul 22 2009, 06:03 AM) [snapback]554386[/snapback]
Yes I colored corrected, normal is to lame I think. I fucked up the aspect so bad, shot it in 16:9
and 24pa with a high shutter speed, which I probably shouldn't have but lol oh wellsuper noob
QUOTE(vode @ Jul 22 2009, 05:29 PM) [snapback]554414[/snapback]
High shutter speed is way to go when filming fast moving objects e.g skating. utube is jerky for me so I couldnt see if using the 24p caused some flckering, but I doubt it. So I think you used well your camera.
The color correction is doen afterwards?
Yeh Vode is right, You happened to do yourself a big favour when you shot it on a high shutter speed. Hence the reason the spakles from the camera flashes showed up so well, which in my opinion made the clip.
QUOTE(imre_tse @ Jul 22 2009, 06:12 PM) [snapback]554416[/snapback]
Yes color correcting was in post, looks a tad warm with no CC, and 24pa was not neccessary because the high shutter pretty much cancels any type of 24p motion effect, I think.
Vode, Ryan and Webb Image file not present in the recovered backup Don't be homos
No the shutter speed does not affect or cancel out the progressive at all, your still getting 24 frames a second, changing the shutter speed is just changing the details the camera are capturing in those 24 frames.
But the point of progressive is to look like film, and the reason film looks so good, is because it captures the same amount of frames as our eyes do. So shooting on a high shutter speed will slightly change the look so it wont seem as much like what our eyes see, which slightly defeats the purpose of shooting progressive, but it will still look alot better than if you hadnt shot progressive.
Also nice aspect ratio and grade, thought the clip was nice. I would have probably 8/4 point garbage matted a camera flash or two, and made that little moment slightly slower and longer and added a couple of extra flashes cos I thought it was awesome
post #12
23 July 2009, 17:53 UTC#12
Didn't like the CC. Too orange/yellow.
post #13
23 July 2009, 20:31 UTC#13
QUOTE(Dex @ Jul 23 2009, 10:46 AM) [snapback]554472[/snapback]
QUOTE(imre_tse @ Jul 22 2009, 06:03 AM) [snapback]554386[/snapback]
Yes I colored corrected, normal is to lame I think. I fucked up the aspect so bad, shot it in 16:9
and 24pa with a high shutter speed, which I probably shouldn't have but lol oh wellsuper noob
QUOTE(vode @ Jul 22 2009, 05:29 PM) [snapback]554414[/snapback]
High shutter speed is way to go when filming fast moving objects e.g skating. utube is jerky for me so I couldnt see if using the 24p caused some flckering, but I doubt it. So I think you used well your camera.
The color correction is doen afterwards?
Yeh Vode is right, You happened to do yourself a big favour when you shot it on a high shutter speed. Hence the reason the spakles from the camera flashes showed up so well, which in my opinion made the clip.
QUOTE(imre_tse @ Jul 22 2009, 06:12 PM) [snapback]554416[/snapback]
Yes color correcting was in post, looks a tad warm with no CC, and 24pa was not neccessary because the high shutter pretty much cancels any type of 24p motion effect, I think.
Vode, Ryan and Webb Image file not present in the recovered backup Don't be homos
No the shutter speed does not affect or cancel out the progressive at all, your still getting 24 frames a second, changing the shutter speed is just changing the details the camera are capturing in those 24 frames.
But the point of progressive is to look like film, and the reason film looks so good, is because it captures the same amount of frames as our eyes do. So shooting on a high shutter speed will slightly change the look so it wont seem as much like what our eyes see, which slightly defeats the purpose of shooting progressive, but it will still look alot better than if you hadnt shot progressive.
Also nice aspect ratio and grade, thought the clip was nice. I would have probably 8/4 point garbage matted a camera flash or two, and made that little moment slightly slower and longer and added a couple of extra flashes cos I thought it was awesome
and thanks for the rest
QUOTE(iFUCKSWIDIT @ Jul 23 2009, 12:53 PM) [snapback]554495[/snapback]
Didn't like the CC. Too orange/yellow.
post #14
23 July 2009, 21:04 UTC#14
QUOTE(imre_tse @ Jul 23 2009, 09:31 PM) [snapback]554507[/snapback]
QUOTE(Dex @ Jul 23 2009, 10:46 AM) [snapback]554472[/snapback]
QUOTE(imre_tse @ Jul 22 2009, 06:03 AM) [snapback]554386[/snapback]
Yes I colored corrected, normal is to lame I think. I fucked up the aspect so bad, shot it in 16:9
and 24pa with a high shutter speed, which I probably shouldn't have but lol oh wellsuper noob
QUOTE(vode @ Jul 22 2009, 05:29 PM) [snapback]554414[/snapback]
High shutter speed is way to go when filming fast moving objects e.g skating. utube is jerky for me so I couldnt see if using the 24p caused some flckering, but I doubt it. So I think you used well your camera.
The color correction is doen afterwards?
Yeh Vode is right, You happened to do yourself a big favour when you shot it on a high shutter speed. Hence the reason the spakles from the camera flashes showed up so well, which in my opinion made the clip.
QUOTE(imre_tse @ Jul 22 2009, 06:12 PM) [snapback]554416[/snapback]
Yes color correcting was in post, looks a tad warm with no CC, and 24pa was not neccessary because the high shutter pretty much cancels any type of 24p motion effect, I think.
Vode, Ryan and Webb Image file not present in the recovered backup Don't be homos
No the shutter speed does not affect or cancel out the progressive at all, your still getting 24 frames a second, changing the shutter speed is just changing the details the camera are capturing in those 24 frames.
But the point of progressive is to look like film, and the reason film looks so good, is because it captures the same amount of frames as our eyes do. So shooting on a high shutter speed will slightly change the look so it wont seem as much like what our eyes see, which slightly defeats the purpose of shooting progressive, but it will still look alot better than if you hadnt shot progressive.
Also nice aspect ratio and grade, thought the clip was nice. I would have probably 8/4 point garbage matted a camera flash or two, and made that little moment slightly slower and longer and added a couple of extra flashes cos I thought it was awesome
and thanks for the rest
QUOTE(iFUCKSWIDIT @ Jul 23 2009, 12:53 PM) [snapback]554495[/snapback]
Didn't like the CC. Too orange/yellow.
Sorry dude. Thought you edited with FCP.
I basically meant take the flash from the camera (make a matte of it) and super inpose it onto the camera a couple of times, and slow that moment down, so for a second hes moving super slow and theres lots of the flashes from the camera.
Make sense?
post #15
23 July 2009, 23:22 UTC#15
QUOTE(Dex @ Jul 23 2009, 04:04 PM) [snapback]554511[/snapback]
QUOTE(imre_tse @ Jul 23 2009, 09:31 PM) [snapback]554507[/snapback]
QUOTE(Dex @ Jul 23 2009, 10:46 AM) [snapback]554472[/snapback]
QUOTE(imre_tse @ Jul 22 2009, 06:03 AM) [snapback]554386[/snapback]
Yes I colored corrected, normal is to lame I think. I fucked up the aspect so bad, shot it in 16:9
and 24pa with a high shutter speed, which I probably shouldn't have but lol oh wellsuper noob
QUOTE(vode @ Jul 22 2009, 05:29 PM) [snapback]554414[/snapback]
High shutter speed is way to go when filming fast moving objects e.g skating. utube is jerky for me so I couldnt see if using the 24p caused some flckering, but I doubt it. So I think you used well your camera.
The color correction is doen afterwards?
Yeh Vode is right, You happened to do yourself a big favour when you shot it on a high shutter speed. Hence the reason the spakles from the camera flashes showed up so well, which in my opinion made the clip.
QUOTE(imre_tse @ Jul 22 2009, 06:12 PM) [snapback]554416[/snapback]
Yes color correcting was in post, looks a tad warm with no CC, and 24pa was not neccessary because the high shutter pretty much cancels any type of 24p motion effect, I think.
Vode, Ryan and Webb Image file not present in the recovered backup Don't be homos
No the shutter speed does not affect or cancel out the progressive at all, your still getting 24 frames a second, changing the shutter speed is just changing the details the camera are capturing in those 24 frames.
But the point of progressive is to look like film, and the reason film looks so good, is because it captures the same amount of frames as our eyes do. So shooting on a high shutter speed will slightly change the look so it wont seem as much like what our eyes see, which slightly defeats the purpose of shooting progressive, but it will still look alot better than if you hadnt shot progressive.
Also nice aspect ratio and grade, thought the clip was nice. I would have probably 8/4 point garbage matted a camera flash or two, and made that little moment slightly slower and longer and added a couple of extra flashes cos I thought it was awesome
and thanks for the rest
QUOTE(iFUCKSWIDIT @ Jul 23 2009, 12:53 PM) [snapback]554495[/snapback]
Didn't like the CC. Too orange/yellow.
Sorry dude. Thought you edited with FCP.
I basically meant take the flash from the camera (make a matte of it) and super inpose it onto the camera a couple of times, and slow that moment down, so for a second hes moving super slow and theres lots of the flashes from the camera.
Make sense?
post #16
23 July 2009, 23:56 UTC#16
QUOTE(imre_tse @ Jul 24 2009, 12:22 AM) [snapback]554519[/snapback]
QUOTE(Dex @ Jul 23 2009, 04:04 PM) [snapback]554511[/snapback]
QUOTE(imre_tse @ Jul 23 2009, 09:31 PM) [snapback]554507[/snapback]
QUOTE(Dex @ Jul 23 2009, 10:46 AM) [snapback]554472[/snapback]
QUOTE(imre_tse @ Jul 22 2009, 06:03 AM) [snapback]554386[/snapback]
Yes I colored corrected, normal is to lame I think. I fucked up the aspect so bad, shot it in 16:9
and 24pa with a high shutter speed, which I probably shouldn't have but lol oh wellsuper noob
QUOTE(vode @ Jul 22 2009, 05:29 PM) [snapback]554414[/snapback]
High shutter speed is way to go when filming fast moving objects e.g skating. utube is jerky for me so I couldnt see if using the 24p caused some flckering, but I doubt it. So I think you used well your camera.
The color correction is doen afterwards?
Yeh Vode is right, You happened to do yourself a big favour when you shot it on a high shutter speed. Hence the reason the spakles from the camera flashes showed up so well, which in my opinion made the clip.
QUOTE(imre_tse @ Jul 22 2009, 06:12 PM) [snapback]554416[/snapback]
Yes color correcting was in post, looks a tad warm with no CC, and 24pa was not neccessary because the high shutter pretty much cancels any type of 24p motion effect, I think.
Vode, Ryan and Webb Image file not present in the recovered backup Don't be homos
No the shutter speed does not affect or cancel out the progressive at all, your still getting 24 frames a second, changing the shutter speed is just changing the details the camera are capturing in those 24 frames.
But the point of progressive is to look like film, and the reason film looks so good, is because it captures the same amount of frames as our eyes do. So shooting on a high shutter speed will slightly change the look so it wont seem as much like what our eyes see, which slightly defeats the purpose of shooting progressive, but it will still look alot better than if you hadnt shot progressive.
Also nice aspect ratio and grade, thought the clip was nice. I would have probably 8/4 point garbage matted a camera flash or two, and made that little moment slightly slower and longer and added a couple of extra flashes cos I thought it was awesome
and thanks for the rest
QUOTE(iFUCKSWIDIT @ Jul 23 2009, 12:53 PM) [snapback]554495[/snapback]
Didn't like the CC. Too orange/yellow.
Sorry dude. Thought you edited with FCP.
I basically meant take the flash from the camera (make a matte of it) and super inpose it onto the camera a couple of times, and slow that moment down, so for a second hes moving super slow and theres lots of the flashes from the camera.
Make sense?
If you wanna send me the clip. I could do it for you to show you what I mean. You could then do your own take on it or just use mine if you like it put put in an edit one day.
post #17
24 July 2009, 04:45 UTC#17
Yeah I will send with the clips I am currently getting for you
post #18
24 July 2009, 09:54 UTC#18
QUOTE(imre_tse @ Jul 24 2009, 05:45 AM) [snapback]554532[/snapback]
Yeah I will send with the clips I am currently getting for you
Cool man.