Forum index / Video Releases / New Tse Clip

New Tse Clip

53 posts · page 1 of 2

post #2
26 November 2008, 06:09 UTC#2
I've said it once and I will say it again...Damn thats sexy.
post #3
26 November 2008, 06:24 UTC#3
Actually that is the third time you have said it.
post #4
26 November 2008, 06:52 UTC#4
oh ya
post #5
26 November 2008, 07:10 UTC#5
Haha I love how much effort you put into everything you film
post #6
26 November 2008, 07:19 UTC#6
Noice one... that worked out great!
post #7
26 November 2008, 10:23 UTC#7
I'm surprised that worked, it turned out good.
post #8
26 November 2008, 10:57 UTC#8
That was pretty fucking cool man! props.
post #9
26 November 2008, 11:20 UTC#9
haha that was nice and original, was funny, shame he kind of try to stop himself from falling so it didnt break aswell but the idea there nice one.
post #10
26 November 2008, 13:06 UTC#10
One word - Awesome.

Definitely WC.
post #11
26 November 2008, 14:28 UTC#11
The only thing I would have done differently is have him shirtless because of the light tubes, but then again there was snow out there so it would have been fucking freezing. It's just that I don't see the point of using light tubes or anything for that matter if it can be sort of... protected by clothing. I know we're all guilty of that once in a while, but I feel like it just defeats the purpose. Sorry for being a dick. It was a fucking sick idea though I won't deny that. Props man.
post #12
26 November 2008, 17:25 UTC#12
fuckin eh'
post #13
26 November 2008, 18:17 UTC#13
Thanx boys.
post #14
26 November 2008, 18:30 UTC#14
QUOTE(EBAlex @ Nov 26 2008, 08:28 AM) [snapback]522580[/snapback]

The only thing I would have done differently is have him shirtless because of the light tubes, but then again there was snow out there so it would have been fucking freezing. It's just that I don't see the point of using light tubes or anything for that matter if it can be sort of... protected by clothing. I know we're all guilty of that once in a while, but I feel like it just defeats the purpose. Sorry for being a dick. It was a fucking sick idea though I won't deny that. Props man.
Oh and for the record we don't try to be hardcore with blood and shit, thats just not us.


QUOTE(ILL-FILMZ @ Nov 26 2008, 05:20 AM) [snapback]522558[/snapback]

haha that was nice and original, was funny, shame he kind of try to stop himself from falling so it didnt break aswell but the idea there nice one.
He actually feel to the side instead of backward at first cause the whole right side blew out cause we thought to back would blow out, but it didn't and still worked.
post #15
26 November 2008, 18:34 UTC#15
looking forward to seeing this on ATN
post #16
26 November 2008, 18:35 UTC#16
CHANGE YOUR TITLES.

Otherwise, awesome.
post #17
26 November 2008, 18:42 UTC#17
to late.

QUOTE(Slavin @ Nov 26 2008, 12:34 PM) [snapback]522636[/snapback]

looking forward to seeing this on ATN
lol lets hope so.

Just finished the break edit.
post #18
26 November 2008, 18:48 UTC#18
IT'S NEVER TOO LATE.
post #20
26 November 2008, 19:24 UTC#20
QUOTE(imre_tse @ Nov 26 2008, 01:30 PM) [snapback]522634[/snapback]

Oh and for the record we don't try to be hardcore with blood and shit, thats just not us.

I didn't mean for it to sound like I'm calling out your toughness or anything. Lol. It's just that, generally, light tubes and other goodies are used to enhance stuff BECAUSE of the possible (and pretty likely) blood/pain they will bring forth. I mean, if you're using them for the sheer "Ooh, the glass popping looked cool and made a noise." then yeah man you got that shit down. It's just my opinion that light tubes and other things used to enhance stunts are unnecessary if the possible danger is eliminated.
post #21
26 November 2008, 19:29 UTC#21
Well we think different.
post #22
26 November 2008, 19:30 UTC#22
Since when was the purpose of all stunts to get hurt?

I always did it because it looked both cool and like it hurt, but in reality it didn't really hurt all that much.

I thought the point was to do things that look like they would be shitty and beyond what the average person would do. They don't actually have to be though, it's all in how you present them.

All of this business about actually breaking your limbs and cutting huge gashes in yourself is pretty stupid to me. Not that it doesn't look cool, but if you can get the same effect without actually going through the maximum amount of pain, why would you do it any other way?

Not taking anything away from people like DanG or Al who do the pain stunts well.
post #23
26 November 2008, 19:36 UTC#23
QUOTE(Ray @ Nov 26 2008, 01:30 PM) [snapback]522661[/snapback]

All of this business about actually breaking your limbs and cutting huge gashes in yourself is pretty stupid to me.
Not taking anything away from people like DanG or Al who do the pain stunts well.
Exactly, all in all it comes down to personal preference.
post #24
26 November 2008, 19:40 UTC#24
I'm not saying everything has to be blood and guts. Lol. You guys know we're not the most extreme group either. I'm just saying that, okay, the using of those things are cool even when they're not necessarily designed to hurt, but most would assume that those things were there to hurt you and how could that be possible if you're fully clothed.

And of course, since all of us here do and are involved with this, we can enjoy and respect stuff like this just for the fact that it was cool that it all worked out according to plan. But if you asked any person who is just a consumer/watcher of stunt videos if they'd rather see that stunt shirt on or off they'd most likely say off.

And then I'll be asked "What, you only do the stunts for other people's enjoyment and not your own?" No. We love doing what we do. But we also believe that people are going to want to see a stunt to it's full potential.

So in this scenario, if we didn't want blood, we'd probably just do the shooting of the chair + falling off the deck thing to the ground. But this was not our idea or our vision. So Imre, if this went just the way you planned it, then fuck yeah man. Good job. I just personally would have went without the tubes if the person was going to be clothed.

No love loss. TSE rocks. :wub:
post #25
26 November 2008, 19:45 UTC#25
We are not making it for people who want to see blood, we are making it for most normal people who want to see stunts and shit that they would never do. It went as good as it could have gone, so it was a success to us.
post #26
26 November 2008, 19:57 UTC#26
I like how TSE have a notable style which doesn't focus on aftermaths and blood but more what's going on and what happens in terms of how you guys construct the stunt and initially carry it out.

You're a very entertaining group. titles titles titles.
post #27
26 November 2008, 20:03 UTC#27
Image file not present in the recovered backup


and lol
post #28
26 November 2008, 20:14 UTC#28
QUOTE(imre_tse @ Nov 26 2008, 02:45 PM) [snapback]522672[/snapback]

We are not making it for people who want to see blood, we are making it for most normal people who want to see stunts and shit that they would never do. It went as good as it could have gone, so it was a success to us.

I agree that it did go very well.

I just think that blood goes hand in hand with stunts and shit people wouldn't do. But it's not a necessity. Fun is. And that's all that matters really.
post #29
26 November 2008, 20:34 UTC#29
I agree with both timmy and alex, but I also feel the stunt would of been better if he was shirtless. not for the fact it would cut him, falling on lightubes normaly doesnt leave anything but afew scratches. but for the look of the stunt and reaction people would have too it would seem to have hurt the guy falling. as to how it is. it dont look like he was hurt or could of been hurt from that stunt it was more of a funny chain of events.

still enjoyible. and still time to redo it in daytime with it taken to the next level...and for toms sake still time to change the titles
post #30
26 November 2008, 20:38 UTC#30
YEAH TITLES WOOO!!