Forum index / Cameras / Modified Rode VideoMic

Modified Rode VideoMic

10 posts · page 1 of 1

post #1
25 November 2008, 04:44 UTC#1
I forgot how it arose, but Vode asked me about my mic and I told him I would make a topic, so here it is. I use a Rode VideoMic, which I bought around two or three years ago. I forgot how much I spent then because money is like shit to me and I flush it away daily, but the price range now is between $120 and $150 USD. I decided to get this mic because the DVC30 is notorious for it's shitty on-board mic, something I failed to research before I bought the camera.

Here are some pictures of how the mic comes stock:

IPB Image

External image not preserved — inspect source: http://c3.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/36/l_280436cc5af64187a044051b0e1b0a16.jpg

Link to really big picture: Clickz

Some reviews: 1 2 3

External image not preserved — inspect source: http://images.digitalmedianet.com/2007/Week_51/htnmxhdh/story/rode_04.jpg

The last picture is a liar.

The big whoop about this mic, besides the awesome quality/price comparison, is it's "shock absorber". As you can see, the mic is suspended by four rubber bands on each end of the piece that is mounted to the camera. A lot of the reviews I read before, and even after, purchasing the mic rave about how awesome this little shock mount contraption is. Maybe I have bad luck, or my style of filming is just rougher than others', but this shock mount thing was a shitty deal from the start. The rubber bands snapped soon after I started using it. If the rubber bands weren't snapping, the little clips that held them were breaking. Even when the mic was fully functional I had to hold the mic down with my hand because the rubber bands squeaked, and since the mic's audio pickup is so good, it caused a really annoying sound to override the audio I actually wanted to be picked up. So, eventually my ghetto instincts kicked in and this is what my mic looks like now:

External image not preserved — inspect source: http://c2.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/14/l_a876f13b316e4e4a96eb1efd13b8bb61.jpg

External image not preserved — inspect source: http://c3.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/28/l_6f8deee1fcd94186b50012c889cb0116.jpg

External image not preserved — inspect source: http://c3.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/19/l_9f92356c166548de897060c4fcbd180e.jpg

External image not preserved — inspect source: http://c2.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/13/l_27e4d8a21e574c0d8dd865652d7a60c5.jpg

External image not preserved — inspect source: http://c1.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/52/l_b870e2f3ad4f41549c21acc86d932828.jpg

External image not preserved — inspect source: http://c2.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/45/l_4f73f3ad41e44e88a9febee6a0579f51.jpg

External image not preserved — inspect source: http://c1.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/31/l_c657e2cb004445ba8421a3696aacb1ac.jpg

External image not preserved — inspect source: http://c1.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/8/l_2fe78aceff3141e093159717a4c42be0.jpg

External image not preserved — inspect source: http://c4.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/13/l_ae01a97efd994ae7a9ac84876f6e8953.jpg

What I did: I said, "fuck this". I broke off the front half of the mic (the piece that connects it to the camera) first. I could of broke the back hoop off too, but I really didn't need to. I had to be careful with this because if I fucked it up too much, I wouldn't of had a way to attach the mic to the camera. After that, I broke off the piece that attached the mic to the whack-ass rubber band shock mount. It was all gravy after that. I had to snip off some excess hangover of the wind reducer so it would fit on all the way, and then I just got me some duct tape, and voila.

Haven't regretted my changes to the mic for a second. It's sturdier than before and I don't have to deal with any noise from rubber bands and such. Hope you bitches enjoyed this read. Comments, questions, etc. are welcome.
post #2
25 November 2008, 04:57 UTC#2
Looks good. Might do the same to mine. Havent had any problems with my mic yet, but usually when I´ve used it, my camera has been on tripod. The mic does feel kind of sketchy when you move with the camera in your hand.

edit: and got to love the ghetto feel of that one.
post #3
25 November 2008, 04:59 UTC#3
Yeah, it's sweet. Looks kinda awkward, but if you don't care about aesthetics then you're all good.
post #4
25 November 2008, 05:01 UTC#4
I dont think the cradle it comes in is that aesthetic to begin with. :biggrin:
post #5
26 November 2008, 21:58 UTC#5
It took me 7teen hours to write this. Someone fucking comment on it.
post #6
26 November 2008, 22:03 UTC#6
Ghetto as fuck, but nice like a fat dog.
post #7
26 November 2008, 22:07 UTC#7
Nice mic, dont understand why anyone would need a shock absorber...
post #8
26 November 2008, 22:18 UTC#8
QUOTE(imre_tse @ Nov 26 2008, 05:03 PM) [snapback]522721[/snapback]

Ghetto as fuck, but nice like a fat dog.

I don't really see it as ghetto at all. it seems more of an improvement then a quick fix. which to me is pretty admirable and shows yate's devotion. like does neone care how musicians instruments look when your on your ipod? seems more a feat of clever ingenuity rather then looking ghetto. function>form

<3
post #9
26 November 2008, 22:22 UTC#9
Fuck yeah.
post #10
27 November 2008, 16:19 UTC#10
But isnt that exactly what ghetto means in this context? Homemade improvment with sketchy materials?

Its still awe