post #1
11 June 2008, 21:46 UTC#1
Forum index / Media & Music / Donnie Darko 2
Donnie Darko 2
24 posts · page 1 of 1
post #2
11 June 2008, 21:49 UTC#2
Why would they do this?!
post #3
11 June 2008, 21:50 UTC#3
The only good thing I can say is that at least it's not done by the original director.
But why they even allowed it to go into production will remain a mystery.
But why they even allowed it to go into production will remain a mystery.
post #4
11 June 2008, 21:52 UTC#4
Yeah I'm surprised they let it happen aswell. Such a fucking awesome film. Like you said though, glad its not the original director.
With abit of luck everyone involved will pull a Heath Ledger and the film wont ever get made.
With abit of luck everyone involved will pull a Heath Ledger and the film wont ever get made.
post #5
11 June 2008, 21:54 UTC#5
fucking sequils.
post #6
11 June 2008, 21:57 UTC#6
QUOTE(JohnBorDumB @ Jun 11 2008, 11:54 PM) [snapback]493998[/snapback]
fucking sequils.
fucking spelelings.
post #7
11 June 2008, 21:58 UTC#7
fucking just waking up.
sequel. happy now?
sequel. happy now?
post #8
post #9
11 June 2008, 22:18 UTC#9
Why!
I loved the first film, everyone seems to have a different take on it as well which always makes it a good film to talk about.
this just sounds rubbish.
Its Butterfly Effect all over again.. I really liked the 1st one and they tried to make the same sorta film again and it just failed.
I loved the first film, everyone seems to have a different take on it as well which always makes it a good film to talk about.
this just sounds rubbish.
Its Butterfly Effect all over again.. I really liked the 1st one and they tried to make the same sorta film again and it just failed.
post #10
11 June 2008, 22:40 UTC#10
The ONE fucking film I felt certain could never have a sequel.
post #11
11 June 2008, 22:44 UTC#11
QUOTE
S. Darko takes place in 1995, seven years after the original film. It follows Donnie Darko's younger sister, Samantha, who, in the wake of his death, has found herself at age 17 with a broken family, mired in feelings of insignificance. When she and her best friend Corey are plagued by bizarre visions, they set off on a road trip to Los Angeles, following Frank the Rabbit's ghost. They arrive at a small town in the midst of a meteorite crash and begin to see the future
It sounds like a retarded fan fiction.
post #12
11 June 2008, 22:47 UTC#12
QUOTE(mono @ Jun 11 2008, 11:44 PM) [snapback]494007[/snapback]
It is a retarded fan fiction.
post #13
12 June 2008, 01:04 UTC#13
The first movie was so epic. This just makes it lose some of its greatness.
post #14
12 June 2008, 01:04 UTC#14
cant wait to see this. going to laugh my ass off at it.
post #15
12 June 2008, 01:28 UTC#15
QUOTE(Liam @ Jun 12 2008, 09:47 AM) [snapback]494008[/snapback]
QUOTE(mono @ Jun 11 2008, 11:44 PM) [snapback]494007[/snapback]
It is a retarded fan fiction.
True that... the "story" is laughable at best. Hollywood eats balls.
post #16
12 June 2008, 04:53 UTC#16
QUOTE(mono @ Jun 11 2008, 10:50 PM) [snapback]493996[/snapback]
The only good thing I can say is that at least it's not done by the original director.
But why they even allowed it to go into production will remain a mystery.
The fuck do you mean by that?
Richard Kelly is badass.
post #17
12 June 2008, 05:43 UTC#17
QUOTE(No Mercy Video @ Jun 12 2008, 05:53 AM) [snapback]494041[/snapback]
QUOTE(mono @ Jun 11 2008, 10:50 PM) [snapback]493996[/snapback]
The only good thing I can say is that at least it's not done by the original director.
But why they even allowed it to go into production will remain a mystery.
The fuck do you mean by that?
Richard Kelly is badass.
As in, at least it's not him fucking it all up.
post #18
12 June 2008, 05:47 UTC#18
QUOTE(Liam @ Jun 12 2008, 06:43 AM) [snapback]494045[/snapback]
QUOTE(No Mercy Video @ Jun 12 2008, 05:53 AM) [snapback]494041[/snapback]
QUOTE(mono @ Jun 11 2008, 10:50 PM) [snapback]493996[/snapback]
The only good thing I can say is that at least it's not done by the original director.
But why they even allowed it to go into production will remain a mystery.
The fuck do you mean by that?
Richard Kelly is badass.
As in, at least it's not him fucking it all up.
Ahhh ok
Understood
post #19
12 June 2008, 10:01 UTC#19
ROADTRIP!!! YAY!
post #20
12 June 2008, 10:07 UTC#20
Elizabeth Berkley is in it, she shows Saved-By-The-Bell Snatch.
post #21
12 June 2008, 10:45 UTC#21
QUOTE(sylo @ Jun 12 2008, 02:18 AM) [snapback]494004[/snapback]
Its Butterfly Effect all over again.. I really liked the 1st one and they tried to make the same sorta film again and it just failed.
I was thinking the same
post #22
12 June 2008, 15:48 UTC#22
The first one to me is a damn cult classic. So why the hell would you make a number 2. I just don't understand. How the fuck do you make a number 2 to this damn movie?
post #23
12 June 2008, 20:12 UTC#23
I'm still waiting for a Titanic 2.
post #24
12 June 2008, 20:20 UTC#24
"They arrive at a small town in the midst of a meteorite crash and begin to see the future."
Buzz Buzz from Earthbound is gonna be in it, I swere it
Buzz Buzz from Earthbound is gonna be in it, I swere it