13 February 2008, 04:35 UTC#1
13 February 2008, 04:42 UTC#2
he did not go overboard or anything
13 February 2008, 04:46 UTC#3
pathetic.
13 February 2008, 04:59 UTC#4
It's funny how someone with such a poor understanding of kids would be put in the situation where he is expected to correct them. Too many adults look at kids and teenagers as "mini-adults." The fact is, the human mind isn't fully developed until it's at least 20 years old in most cases. Kids do not have the same cognitive abilities as an adult. The cop approached the situation as though this poor 14 year old had the same mental capabilities of a grown ass man.
Yeah, the kid shouldn't have been skateboarding. However, he wasn't giving the kid shit for skateboarding, he was yelling about the kid being "disrespectful" when addressing him. The cop needs to understand that he can't expect a kid to adopt a completely different vernacular and vocabulary when addressing him. "Dude" and "Man" are not terms of disrespect for kids. They're terms of endearment and camaraderie.
Cops should be forced into extensive training for dealing with youths. Especially if they're going to be expected to patrol an area where kids are going to be at. Adults just have too high of expectations from kids, especially those they do not know.
13 February 2008, 05:20 UTC#5
I think we here at HGF should spam the police department with emails to get this douche fired. That's fucked up.
My comment on the site:
QUOTE
He straight up told the kid that someone would kill him. As an officer of the law you shouldn’t go about talking to a kid like that. And as far as the officer touching the kid, he should press charges, because that was completely uncalled for, and unprofessional. The officer should be fired from his position. Not only was it wrong, but one of those kids could have had a firearm on them, and when he touched their friend they could have fired, which could have ended up hurting someone not involved in the incident. Therefore, it could be considered inducing panic in public, on the officer.
13 February 2008, 05:36 UTC#6
I wish cops would talk to me like this. Especially one driving that faggy little car. I'd run his ass over in that little piece of shit.
13 February 2008, 05:38 UTC#7
I wanna hear his finish his last sentence. Something about "I better not see myself on the internet..." probably ended with something along the lines of: "because I'll loose my metal name tag and pepper spray, then I'll have to go work on the ranch with the dudes."
13 February 2008, 05:41 UTC#8
No doubt that kid is a douche, but the excessive force was ridiculous.
13 February 2008, 05:42 UTC#9
they cant really do anything to him, that tape means nothing, its illigall to recored someones video/audio with out there premission. Thus that evidence was illigally obtained, and it cant be used in court.
If I was that kid though, I be yellin my ass off at him though.
13 February 2008, 05:45 UTC#10
Wrong. Anything filmed in public you don't need anyones permission. Think of the paparazzi.
13 February 2008, 05:46 UTC#11
Plus, the officer's position is a public service. Anything he does is under the scrutiny and surveillance of the pubbbblic.
13 February 2008, 05:48 UTC#12
I think the kids should have done a citizens arrest for wearing such an ugly-ass uniform.
13 February 2008, 06:01 UTC#13
QUOTE(Big Mike @ Feb 12 2008, 11:48 PM) [snapback]466894[/snapback]
I think the kids should have done a citizens arrest for wearing such an ugly-ass uniform.
agreed
13 February 2008, 07:11 UTC#14
QUOTE(jonb @ Feb 13 2008, 01:42 AM) [snapback]466889[/snapback]
they cant really do anything to him, that tape means nothing, its illigall to recored someones video/audio with out there premission. Thus that evidence was illigally obtained, and it cant be used in court.
If I was that kid though, I be yellin my ass off at him though.
just shut up your stupid?
QUOTE(Big Mike @ Feb 13 2008, 01:45 AM) [snapback]466892[/snapback]
Wrong. Anything filmed in public you don't need anyones permission. Think of the paparazzi.
wrong
you people really really really shouldnt tell people stuff unless u know for sure.
13 February 2008, 07:15 UTC#15
QUOTE(Duran @ Feb 13 2008, 01:11 AM) [snapback]466897[/snapback]
QUOTE(jonb @ Feb 13 2008, 01:42 AM) [snapback]466889[/snapback]
they cant really do anything to him, that tape means nothing, its illigall to recored someones video/audio with out there premission. Thus that evidence was illigally obtained, and it cant be used in court.
If I was that kid though, I be yellin my ass off at him though.
just shut up your stupid?
QUOTE(Big Mike @ Feb 13 2008, 01:45 AM) [snapback]466892[/snapback]
Wrong. Anything filmed in public you don't need anyones permission. Think of the paparazzi.
wrong
you people really really really shouldnt tell people stuff unless u know for sure.
its going to be diffrant in a diffrent state duran, what is true in flordia is not true around the world.
13 February 2008, 07:32 UTC#16
QUOTE(jonb @ Feb 13 2008, 03:15 AM) [snapback]466898[/snapback]
QUOTE(Duran @ Feb 13 2008, 01:11 AM) [snapback]466897[/snapback]
QUOTE(jonb @ Feb 13 2008, 01:42 AM) [snapback]466889[/snapback]
they cant really do anything to him, that tape means nothing, its illigall to recored someones video/audio with out there premission. Thus that evidence was illigally obtained, and it cant be used in court.
If I was that kid though, I be yellin my ass off at him though.
just shut up your stupid?
its going to be diffrant in a diffrent state duran, what is true in flordia is not true around the world.
no its not. and you shouldnt spread false info.
13 February 2008, 07:40 UTC#17
QUOTE(jonb @ Feb 13 2008, 04:15 AM) [snapback]466898[/snapback]
QUOTE(Duran @ Feb 13 2008, 01:11 AM) [snapback]466897[/snapback]
QUOTE(jonb @ Feb 13 2008, 01:42 AM) [snapback]466889[/snapback]
they cant really do anything to him, that tape means nothing, its illigall to recored someones video/audio with out there premission. Thus that evidence was illigally obtained, and it cant be used in court.
If I was that kid though, I be yellin my ass off at him though.
just shut up your stupid?
QUOTE(Big Mike @ Feb 13 2008, 01:45 AM) [snapback]466892[/snapback]
Wrong. Anything filmed in public you don't need anyones permission. Think of the paparazzi.
wrong
you people really really really shouldnt tell people stuff unless u know for sure.
its going to be diffrant in a diffrent state duran, what is true in flordia is not true around the world.
Naw man Duran is right on this one, trust me.
13 February 2008, 07:45 UTC#18

I'd love to meet the person who actually takes something seriously they read on here and applies it to their every day life.
13 February 2008, 07:46 UTC#19
QUOTE(Ray @ Feb 13 2008, 04:45 AM) [snapback]466902[/snapback]

I'd love to meet the person who actually takes something seriously they read on here and applies it to their every day life.
What I said to the cop in the DVD trailer was just what Weak told anyone to say in my situation, word for word almost.
13 February 2008, 07:50 UTC#20
Correction - I would love to meet someone who would actually take something that they read on here from someone they don't know and apply it to their every day life.
Fact is, the majority of our membership are teenagers whom spend their free time doing the stunt thing. If someone's going to take legal advice from just anyone on here, they deserve to get into whatever trouble they get into.
13 February 2008, 13:15 UTC#21
I've read on multiple sites this morning that you can film anyone in a public place without their permission, for as long as you want. The only thing illegal to do is voiceover something about the person, or try to use it in an ad or sell it. Show me where it says you cannot film someone in public without their permission. I'm not saying you guys are wrong, but I have never seen anything that says that, and I went to college for film and I remember my professor telling us this.
13 February 2008, 15:37 UTC#22
QUOTE(Ray @ Feb 13 2008, 02:50 AM) [snapback]466904[/snapback]
Correction - I would love to meet someone who would actually take something that they read on here from someone they don't know and apply it to their every day life.
Kids, let this be a lesson to you, don't listen to Ray
13 February 2008, 15:48 UTC#23
Never never never never listen to Ray.
13 February 2008, 15:51 UTC#24
That's right...cause he'll manipulate your little minds
13 February 2008, 16:07 UTC#25
And then finger you.
13 February 2008, 16:10 UTC#26
And to think that they let people like him work at children's summer camps..
13 February 2008, 16:15 UTC#27
It's disgusting.
13 February 2008, 17:04 UTC#28
QUOTE(benCKa @ Feb 13 2008, 11:10 AM) [snapback]466983[/snapback]
And to think that they let people like him work at children's summer camps..
He manipulates the owners of the summer camps too
13 February 2008, 17:47 UTC#29
QUOTE(jonb @ Feb 13 2008, 03:15 AM) [snapback]466898[/snapback]
QUOTE(Duran @ Feb 13 2008, 01:11 AM) [snapback]466897[/snapback]
QUOTE(jonb @ Feb 13 2008, 01:42 AM) [snapback]466889[/snapback]
they cant really do anything to him, that tape means nothing, its illigall to recored someones video/audio with out there premission. Thus that evidence was illigally obtained, and it cant be used in court.
If I was that kid though, I be yellin my ass off at him though.
just shut up your stupid?
QUOTE(Big Mike @ Feb 13 2008, 01:45 AM) [snapback]466892[/snapback]
Wrong. Anything filmed in public you don't need anyones permission. Think of the paparazzi.
wrong
you people really really really shouldnt tell people stuff unless u know for sure.
its going to be diffrant in a diffrent state duran, what is true in flordia is not true around the world.
you can film stuff in public even a cop you just cant sell or use the footage like online. you can carry a camera around all day film whatever you want as long as its for yourself. in this case they prob used it in court so its not illegal and the the news put it online or something.. this right??
13 February 2008, 18:37 UTC#30
you reckon photography laws and filming laws are roughly the same?
if so
read this;
http://www.krages.com/ThePhotographersRight.pdf