09 January 2008, 17:57 UTC#1
That you may have a black president?
09 January 2008, 18:01 UTC#2
EWWWWWWW
09 January 2008, 18:03 UTC#3
I'd rather have a "black" president than a woman.
09 January 2008, 18:14 UTC#4
I'm sure you expected this answer, but I don't see why it's a big deal.
09 January 2008, 18:42 UTC#5
You realise he said 'black' right?
09 January 2008, 18:56 UTC#6
I'm pretty sure he's only half black anyways, its not like Snoop Dogg is running or anything. Plus I think it'll be a good change from rich white racist fucks that don't even believe in evolution. I'd vote for an athiest if there was one running!
09 January 2008, 19:03 UTC#7
QUOTE(Wilbur @ Jan 9 2008, 07:03 PM) [snapback]460385[/snapback]
I'd rather have a "black" president than a woman.
09 January 2008, 19:04 UTC#8
I want the black one to win, think of the comdey skeches that will be made, I mean, im going to miss the bush ones, unless if she wins will bill be anywhere in the whitehouse or have they broken up?
09 January 2008, 19:06 UTC#9
They're still together, but he's old as fuck now. They're both dumb as hell, Hilary wants more censorship and shit, fuck that bitch.
09 January 2008, 19:09 UTC#10
QUOTE(Wilbur @ Jan 9 2008, 07:06 PM) [snapback]460399[/snapback]
Hilary wants more censorship and shit, fuck that bitch.
and I don't even live in your country
09 January 2008, 19:12 UTC#11
Don't worry I'll vote against her for you. I'll vote against anyone who tries to fuck with my internet!
09 January 2008, 19:14 UTC#12
Yeah, fuck Hilary.
The other guy wins by default.
09 January 2008, 19:23 UTC#13
QUOTE(Wilbur @ Jan 9 2008, 02:56 PM) [snapback]460393[/snapback]
I'm pretty sure he's only half black anyways, its not like Snoop Dogg is running or anything. Plus I think it'll be a good change from rich white racist fucks that don't even believe in evolution. I'd vote for an athiest if there was one running!
Agreed!
09 January 2008, 19:50 UTC#14
Anything is better than George Bush
09 January 2008, 20:13 UTC#15
EVRYUN VOAT RON PAWL NOW GO!
09 January 2008, 20:38 UTC#16
Ron Paul doesn't believe in evolution or abortion, lets throw aborted fetuses at him.
09 January 2008, 20:43 UTC#17
09 January 2008, 20:47 UTC#18
I dont believe in abortion, does that mean im disowned by HGF?
personally, I dont believe abortion is right. due to my religious background (im a christian, but loosely), I see abortion as murder. but under the united states constitution, I dont think I have any right to try force my belief on those who dont believe as I do.
09 January 2008, 20:57 UTC#19
Conan has a sweet beard now; I saw it last night.
I'm not really into politics, but I'm sure Obama or Clinton would both be better than Bush. Sadly enough though, I'm sure either one of them will be killed short-after they're elected.
09 January 2008, 21:10 UTC#20
Yeah noticed that too. Is the writers strike over now or why is Conan back on air?
09 January 2008, 21:13 UTC#21
QUOTE(nickstatler @ Jan 9 2008, 09:47 PM) [snapback]460424[/snapback]
I dont believe in abortion, does that mean im disowned by HGF?
personally, I dont believe abortion is right. due to my religious background (im a christian, but loosely), I see abortion as murder. but under the united states constitution, I dont think I have any right to try force my belief on those who dont believe as I do.
Just because you don't believe in it, you think we should force every woman who gets pregnant to give birth to an unwanted child or end up getting an abortion from some sketchy place illegally?
If not, then you're still cool.
Image file not present in the recovered backup09 January 2008, 21:14 UTC#22
QUOTE(nickstatler @ Jan 9 2008, 10:47 PM) [snapback]460424[/snapback]
I dont believe in abortion, does that mean im disowned by HGF?
personally, I dont believe abortion is right. due to my religious background (im a christian, but loosely), I see abortion as murder. but under the united states constitution, I dont think I have any right to try force my belief on those who dont believe as I do.
Yep we disown you. Nar the problem isn't in whether you think it's right or wrong,like you said, it's whether you impose that on others. Don't like it, don't do it.
09 January 2008, 21:17 UTC#23
QUOTE(benCKa @ Jan 9 2008, 07:10 PM) [snapback]460428[/snapback]
Yeah noticed that too. Is the writers strike over now or why is Conan back on air?
I don't know if the strike is over; I don't think it is though. My best guess is they still have shows, but not daily because they can't keep up with the material. Jay Leno had a new episode last night as well, because Pamela Anderson actually mentioned the strike.
09 January 2008, 21:22 UTC#24
Strike's not over. The hosts are doing the shows with their own non-unionized groups of writers and themselves. The Daily Show and Colbert were both back on, too. Neither were very funny, it's so painfully obvious that it's just not the same without the writers there to make it funny. And, I think Jon Stewart and Colbert both sort of intentionally made their shows dull and slow to emphasize the importance of the writers and show how lame TV would be without their talents.
09 January 2008, 21:26 UTC#25
the conan episode was funny as fuck

09 January 2008, 21:26 UTC#26
someones gonna get shot this year, ither obama or hillary.. its gonna be wacked out this year
09 January 2008, 21:29 UTC#27
QUOTE(j0nes @ Jan 9 2008, 05:26 PM) [snapback]460435[/snapback]
the conan episode was funny as fuck

Conan himself is hilarious.
09 January 2008, 21:59 UTC#28
QUOTE(Yates @ Jan 9 2008, 03:57 PM) [snapback]460425[/snapback]
Sadly enough though, I'm sure either one of them will be killed short-after they're elected.
I'm sure there would be numerous assassination attempts if either one of them were president.
09 January 2008, 22:39 UTC#29
Obama's middle name is hussein lol. He says he will legalize bud but I think it's just to get votes.
Hilary cried during some shit, leaders don't cry on tv it's a sign of weakness.
09 January 2008, 23:05 UTC#30
america is fucked