28 October 2007, 23:29 UTC#1
28 October 2007, 23:34 UTC#2
Wheelbarrow shot wins.
Rest made me lose interest.
28 October 2007, 23:39 UTC#3
QUOTE(!AN @ Oct 28 2007, 05:34 PM) [snapback]446269[/snapback]
Wheelbarrow shot wins.
Rest made me lose interest.
ok, thank you for your input
28 October 2007, 23:39 UTC#4
I didn't mind it, some content was average, most good (I liked the golf ball to the ass in particular...they hurt like a bitch). Constructive criticism? Work on editing I'd say and maybe improve angles and whatnot. Not so many jumps either, just focus on your good ones.
28 October 2007, 23:43 UTC#5
QUOTE(Lamer @ Oct 28 2007, 05:39 PM) [snapback]446271[/snapback]
I didn't mind it, some content was average, most good (I liked the golf ball to the ass in particular...they hurt like a bitch). Constructive criticism? Work on editing I'd say and maybe improve angles and whatnot. Not so many jumps either, just focus on your good ones.
ok, thanks, I haveasked people for help like this but they never actualy go into this much detail.
28 October 2007, 23:46 UTC#6
QUOTE(deadbeat @ Oct 28 2007, 07:43 PM) [snapback]446272[/snapback]
QUOTE(Lamer @ Oct 28 2007, 05:39 PM) [snapback]446271[/snapback]
I didn't mind it, some content was average, most good (I liked the golf ball to the ass in particular...they hurt like a bitch). Constructive criticism? Work on editing I'd say and maybe improve angles and whatnot. Not so many jumps either, just focus on your good ones.
ok, thanks, I haveasked people for help like this but they never actualy go into this much detail.
Don't listen to him.
I think you guys already have a good style of editing.
I think you should focus on larger scale stunts though, you guys obviously are pretty "fuck it" and are selling your selfs short with the weaker stuff.
Improve angles yeah, but the fact your using two is really good, keep that up.
28 October 2007, 23:50 UTC#7
QUOTE(Funk Master Shiestorz @ Oct 28 2007, 05:46 PM) [snapback]446273[/snapback]
QUOTE(deadbeat @ Oct 28 2007, 07:43 PM) [snapback]446272[/snapback]
QUOTE(Lamer @ Oct 28 2007, 05:39 PM) [snapback]446271[/snapback]
I didn't mind it, some content was average, most good (I liked the golf ball to the ass in particular...they hurt like a bitch). Constructive criticism? Work on editing I'd say and maybe improve angles and whatnot. Not so many jumps either, just focus on your good ones.
ok, thanks, I haveasked people for help like this but they never actualy go into this much detail.
Don't listen to him.
I think you guys already have a good style of editing.
I think you should focus on larger scale stunts though, you guys obviously are pretty "fuck it" and are selling your selfs short with the weaker stuff.
Improve angles yeah, but the fact your using two is really good, keep that up.
ok, thanks, we have tried larger scale stunds before but we cant quite get them to strech lon enough, like insteat of going for 5 miutes we go for 2 minutes, do you know how we could do that?
28 October 2007, 23:56 UTC#8
Whatever Al...by fixing editing, I meant syncing better. I could see what they were trying to do in some parts with the dissolves, but for some reason it didn't come out as good as it could have. And when I said jumps I also meant falls like off the ladders and stuff.
I'll admit I'm not the best editor, but I can have an opinion can't I? No? Alright I'll shut up

Look forward to seeing you guys improve.
28 October 2007, 23:57 UTC#9
I don't think you get what I'm saying.
Like when Brown rolled down a hill with light tubes tied to his back, through 3 light tubes.
The roll with the tubes its self was a stunt, then he went through the wall of tubes.
Your shit is more like push guy off in barrel, or hit guy with something.
You need to get creative.
QUOTE
Whatever Al...by fixing editing, I meant syncing better. I could see what they were trying to do in some parts with the dissolves, but for some reason it didn't come out as good as it could have. And when I said jumps I also meant falls like off the ladders and stuff.
I'll admit I'm not the best editor, but I can have an opinion can't I? No? Alright I'll shut up

Look forward to seeing you guys improve.
I was talking about when you said "less jumps" thats such stupid advice. Content is content.
28 October 2007, 23:59 UTC#10
And an opinion's an opinion. Get over it!
29 October 2007, 00:01 UTC#11
QUOTE(Lamer @ Oct 28 2007, 05:56 PM) [snapback]446277[/snapback]
Whatever Al...by fixing editing, I meant syncing better. I could see what they were trying to do in some parts with the dissolves, but for some reason it didn't come out as good as it could have. And when I said jumps I also meant falls like off the ladders and stuff.
I'll admit I'm not the best editor, but I can have an opinion can't I? No? Alright I'll shut up

Look forward to seeing you guys improve.
ok, I understand, thanks
29 October 2007, 00:02 UTC#12
QUOTE(Lamer @ Oct 28 2007, 07:59 PM) [snapback]446279[/snapback]
And an opinion's an opinion. Get over it!
Jeeze, get over it man, I told you why I said "don't listen to lamer". It's not opinion it's just a fucking stupid suggestion.
Jumps are cool, if there good, less bush jumps maybe is what you meant.
29 October 2007, 00:02 UTC#13
QUOTE(Funk Master Shiestorz @ Oct 28 2007, 05:57 PM) [snapback]446278[/snapback]
I don't think you get what I'm saying.
Like when Brown rolled down a hill with light tubes tied to his back, through 3 light tubes.
The roll with the tubes its self was a stunt, then he went through the wall of tubes.
Your shit is more like push guy off in barrel, or hit guy with something.
You need to get creative.
QUOTE
Whatever Al...by fixing editing, I meant syncing better. I could see what they were trying to do in some parts with the dissolves, but for some reason it didn't come out as good as it could have. And when I said jumps I also meant falls like off the ladders and stuff.
I'll admit I'm not the best editor, but I can have an opinion can't I? No? Alright I'll shut up

Look forward to seeing you guys improve.
I was talking about when you said "less jumps" thats such stupid advice. Content is content.
I am soo lost right now.
sorry if I dont understand, I am not to smart
29 October 2007, 00:05 UTC#14
I give up

29 October 2007, 00:57 UTC#15
its like a tame lsd riders, same music too.
29 October 2007, 01:15 UTC#16
I liked it.
29 October 2007, 01:33 UTC#17
QUOTE(Duran @ Oct 28 2007, 06:57 PM) [snapback]446298[/snapback]
its like a tame lsd riders, same music too.
it is by the same band in the LSD Riders, the barnyard Ballers.
29 October 2007, 01:47 UTC#18
I thought it was a really good little mixup.
The music and the way the content was cut, worked well with each other.
Some small suggestions would be...
-put a little more creativity into your stunts as Al metioned.
-and get yourself a copy of adobe premier.. if you havnt already, and play around with that eg. transitions, effects and text.
cheers Image file not present in the recovered backup
29 October 2007, 02:01 UTC#19
QUOTE(deadbeat @ Oct 28 2007, 10:33 PM) [snapback]446320[/snapback]
QUOTE(Duran @ Oct 28 2007, 06:57 PM) [snapback]446298[/snapback]
its like a tame lsd riders, same music too.
it is by the same band in the LSD Riders, the barnyard Ballers.
really? holy shit!
29 October 2007, 02:04 UTC#20
QUOTE(Duran @ Oct 28 2007, 08:01 PM) [snapback]446335[/snapback]
QUOTE(deadbeat @ Oct 28 2007, 10:33 PM) [snapback]446320[/snapback]
QUOTE(Duran @ Oct 28 2007, 06:57 PM) [snapback]446298[/snapback]
its like a tame lsd riders, same music too.
it is by the same band in the LSD Riders, the barnyard Ballers.
really? holy shit!
what, are you surprised?
29 October 2007, 02:05 UTC#21
c'mon man, you can't be that stupid.
29 October 2007, 02:06 UTC#22
QUOTE(Lamer @ Oct 28 2007, 08:05 PM) [snapback]446339[/snapback]
c'mon man, you can't be that stupid.
what?
29 October 2007, 02:09 UTC#23
Far be it for me to use one's inability to detect sarcasm as an accurate measure of intelligence, but in this case, I will.
29 October 2007, 02:13 UTC#24
QUOTE(Lamer @ Oct 28 2007, 08:09 PM) [snapback]446341[/snapback]
Far be it for me to use one's inability to detect sarcasm as an accurate measure of intelligence, but in this case, I will.
QUOTE(Lamer @ Oct 28 2007, 08:09 PM) [snapback]446341[/snapback]
Far be it for me to use one's inability to detect sarcasm as an accurate measure of intelligence, but in this case, I will.
nevermind, I applogize.
29 October 2007, 02:14 UTC#25
I liked alot of that stuff too bad youre not good at editing... sweet tho!
29 October 2007, 03:08 UTC#26
Footage had it's ups and downs. Keep it up.