Forum index / Video Releases / Part Zero - New Trailer

Part Zero - New Trailer

40 posts · page 1 of 2

post #1
24 August 2007, 14:06 UTC#1
This is the new trailer for our dvd, which we think wil be released about december - february. Tell us what you think. (yes, there is a shopping cart, I know that...)

Youtube Link

Hope you will show interest as soon as it's done.
post #2
24 August 2007, 14:13 UTC#2
didnt keep me intrested, you cant edit fast music to slow cuts like that. if this is your lastes edit and you havnt worked that out it means the dvd will be along the same lines?
post #4
24 August 2007, 14:16 UTC#4
Seen it all before. Sorry dude.
post #5
24 August 2007, 14:16 UTC#5
The dvd won't be anything like the trailer. We mostly do self-inflicted pain, and fast editing does not really work in most of what we've got.
post #6
24 August 2007, 14:18 UTC#6
Why make a trailer that doesn't accurately reflect the content? :laugh:
post #7
24 August 2007, 14:19 UTC#7
I can edit clips of cats sitting around the house and make it fast editing or slow editing to any type of music. dont pull the whole. well we have this footage, if you edited it fast. your pc would crash malarky
post #8
24 August 2007, 14:24 UTC#8
QUOTE(cIRca @ Aug 24 2007, 05:18 PM) [snapback]431950[/snapback]

Why make a trailer that doesn't accurately reflect the content? :laugh:


Okay, I admit that sounded weird, but hopefully you get it anyway Image file not present in the recovered backup

QUOTE(ill-advised @ Aug 24 2007, 05:19 PM) [snapback]431952[/snapback]

I can edit clips of cats sitting around the house and make it fast editing or slow editing to any type of music. dont pull the whole. well we have this footage, if you edited it fast. your pc would crash malarky


I know that, but we're pretty new to the whole editing shit together scene, so you may/may not get disappointed. I know it's a little 'we play crazy' to say that we go for sick footage, not editing, but that's the way it is in our case.
post #9
24 August 2007, 14:26 UTC#9
Yeah but see if you can't edit and your knew to this whole "editing scene" your missing a huge component of making a good movie.

post #10
24 August 2007, 14:30 UTC#10
QUOTE(Funk Master Shiestorz @ Aug 24 2007, 05:26 PM) [snapback]431956[/snapback]

Yeah but see if you can't edit and your knew to this whole "editing scene" your missing a huge component of making a good movie.


I meant about trailers/fast editing. I'm not shitty at editing, but it's hard to make an outstanding trailer. I'm gonna take a smokebreak and stop defending myself. :mellow:
post #11
24 August 2007, 14:32 UTC#11
QUOTE(borislort @ Aug 24 2007, 04:24 PM) [snapback]431955[/snapback]

QUOTE(cIRca @ Aug 24 2007, 05:18 PM) [snapback]431950[/snapback]

Why make a trailer that doesn't accurately reflect the content? :laugh:


Okay, I admit that sounded weird, but hopefully you get it anyway Image file not present in the recovered backup

QUOTE(ill-advised @ Aug 24 2007, 05:19 PM) [snapback]431952[/snapback]

I can edit clips of cats sitting around the house and make it fast editing or slow editing to any type of music. dont pull the whole. well we have this footage, if you edited it fast. your pc would crash malarky


I know that, but we're pretty new to the whole editing shit together scene, so you may/may not get disappointed. I know it's a little 'we play crazy' to say that we go for sick footage, not editing, but that's the way it is in our case.


if thats the case then I am correct. the movie will be edited like the trailer?.....aka....not so good (yes I know your new to editing) so point taken the film will be like that yes?
post #12
24 August 2007, 14:46 UTC#12
if thats the case then I am correct. the movie will be edited like the trailer?.....aka....not so good (yes I know your new to editing) so point taken the film will be like that yes?
[/quote]

Basically a bunch of segments of self-inflicted linked together, with occasional fast editing. Think a mix of cky and dirty sanchez.
post #13
24 August 2007, 14:51 UTC#13
I CANT WAIT.
post #14
24 August 2007, 14:52 UTC#14
QUOTE(cIRca @ Aug 24 2007, 05:51 PM) [snapback]431965[/snapback]

I CANT WAIT.


Ironic, eh?
post #15
24 August 2007, 14:57 UTC#15
QUOTE


QUOTE(borislort @ Aug 24 2007, 04:46 PM) [snapback]431964[/snapback]

if thats the case then I am correct. the movie will be edited like the trailer?.....aka....not so good (yes I know your new to editing) so point taken the film will be like that yes?


Basically a bunch of segments of self-inflicted linked together, with occasional fast editing. Think a mix of cky and dirty sanchez.


cant you be original? you know...so its worth watching
post #16
24 August 2007, 15:14 UTC#16
Don't know what to say except for that's what most groups start out with. Our first video mixup was similar.. None of that content ended up in the final movie though :)
post #17
24 August 2007, 15:15 UTC#17
QUOTE(borislort @ Aug 24 2007, 04:52 PM) [snapback]431966[/snapback]

QUOTE(cIRca @ Aug 24 2007, 05:51 PM) [snapback]431965[/snapback]

I CANT WAIT.


Ironic, eh?

Nope.
post #18
24 August 2007, 15:32 UTC#18
nothing new, but it werent that bad... tho I dont like the music
post #19
24 August 2007, 16:20 UTC#19
to anyone doubting the dvd to be original, I have to say it will be.
You can compare it to other stuff, but it will be a style of its own. I know it will have stuff that has been done before, but the purpose of the dvd is to raise scandinavian Homegrown.
post #20
24 August 2007, 18:27 UTC#20
QUOTE(borislort @ Aug 24 2007, 11:06 AM) [snapback]431940[/snapback]

(yes, there is a shopping cart, I know that...)



haha I still have never done one, and sorta want to just cuz its like the main thing when people think of jackass
post #21
24 August 2007, 19:01 UTC#21
QUOTE(borislort @ Aug 24 2007, 08:46 AM) [snapback]431964[/snapback]

Think a mix of cky and dirty sanchez.



QUOTE(borislort @ Aug 24 2007, 10:20 AM) [snapback]431982[/snapback]

but it will be a style of its own.



Image file not present in the recovered backup

post #22
24 August 2007, 19:03 UTC#22
QUOTE(jonb @ Aug 24 2007, 04:01 PM) [snapback]432076[/snapback]

QUOTE(borislort @ Aug 24 2007, 08:46 AM) [snapback]431964[/snapback]

Think a mix of cky and dirty sanchez.



QUOTE(borislort @ Aug 24 2007, 10:20 AM) [snapback]431982[/snapback]

but it will be a style of its own.



Image file not present in the recovered backup



:laugh:
post #23
24 August 2007, 20:28 UTC#23
Some clip was good some were not Image file not present in the recovered backup
post #24
25 August 2007, 17:22 UTC#24
QUOTE(jonb @ Aug 24 2007, 10:01 PM) [snapback]432076[/snapback]

QUOTE(borislort @ Aug 24 2007, 08:46 AM) [snapback]431964[/snapback]

Think a mix of cky and dirty sanchez.



QUOTE(borislort @ Aug 24 2007, 10:20 AM) [snapback]431982[/snapback]

but it will be a style of its own.



Image file not present in the recovered backup


Why is that so hard to understand?
post #25
25 August 2007, 18:18 UTC#25
well u say that u will take 2 other peoples styles and mix them to make an origanal.
post #26
25 August 2007, 18:22 UTC#26
iv realized that people shouldnt make "DVD's" until people really like there other stuff and they've been doing it for a while...lol.
post #27
25 August 2007, 18:40 UTC#27
QUOTE(DKWAC @ Aug 25 2007, 02:22 PM) [snapback]432444[/snapback]

iv realized that people shouldnt make "DVD's" until people really like there other stuff and they've been doing it for a while...lol.


duh.
post #28
25 August 2007, 18:48 UTC#28
QUOTE(nickstatler @ Aug 25 2007, 07:40 PM) [snapback]432454[/snapback]

QUOTE(DKWAC @ Aug 25 2007, 02:22 PM) [snapback]432444[/snapback]

iv realized that people shouldnt make "DVD's" until people really like there other stuff and they've been doing it for a while...lol.


duh.


Well obviously it's not "duh" to everyone, lol.
post #29
25 August 2007, 21:12 UTC#29
QUOTE(jonb @ Aug 25 2007, 09:18 PM) [snapback]432442[/snapback]

well u say that u will take 2 other peoples styles and mix them to make an origanal.


Yeah. Well, cky and ds may be bad examples, because I cant really compare the editing completely to anything at the moment. (which may be good)
post #30
25 August 2007, 21:22 UTC#30
you cant take it back....once you said it, you're labled with it 4 lyf