Forum index / Cameras / Fisheye Lens

Fisheye Lens

15 posts · page 1 of 1

post #1
02 August 2007, 11:26 UTC#1
im looking to get a good quality fisheye lense for my dvc30. Can someone recommend a good one and a good place to buy it? The threads are 43mm, I searched ebay and only found some cheap Raynox ones.
post #3
02 August 2007, 18:09 UTC#3
go with the raynox its fucking amazing
post #4
02 August 2007, 18:12 UTC#4
I plan on getting the mx-3000 soon because for me money is a big deal. That and I liked the way Yates' looked.
post #5
02 August 2007, 18:50 UTC#5
Yeah the mx is great if you're not making money from filming.
post #6
02 August 2007, 18:59 UTC#6
QUOTE(Wilbur @ Aug 2 2007, 07:50 PM) [snapback]425532[/snapback]

Yeah the mx is great if you're not making money from filming.


what makes you say that? is the mx terrible or weakens the quality?
post #7
02 August 2007, 19:21 UTC#7
I was wondering that myself.
post #8
02 August 2007, 19:23 UTC#8
It's not terrible at all, I use one myself. It does make the quality much worse though.
post #9
02 August 2007, 19:23 UTC#9
QUOTE(Mr. Brown @ Aug 2 2007, 12:12 PM) [snapback]425509[/snapback]

I plan on getting the mx-3000 soon because for me money is a big deal. That and I liked the way Yates' looked.

is that even a lense
post #10
02 August 2007, 19:25 UTC#10
No, we're talking about a pretend lens.
post #11
02 August 2007, 19:32 UTC#11
I got one and its sex.
post #12
02 August 2007, 19:33 UTC#12
The Raynox MX-3000 : it exists.

That sucks about it making the quality worse though.
post #13
02 August 2007, 19:34 UTC#13
I wouldn't worry about it man.
post #14
02 August 2007, 19:39 UTC#14
Alright. I filmed with the DVC30 that Yates had with the Raynox on there and the quality was still great.
post #15
02 August 2007, 19:51 UTC#15
Yeah man, you wont notice anything wrong with it unless you nit pick.