09 February 2007, 10:22 UTC#31
cheers
09 February 2007, 10:27 UTC#32
Mine was a little over 1300 when I bought it.
09 February 2007, 10:36 UTC#33
I'd be happy with a 1/3 single chipper at the moment.
09 February 2007, 16:28 UTC#34
Louzy's Sony HC1 - £800
Fisheye - £20
My XM2 - £1000
Fisheye - £50
Tapes - £60-80
Tripod - £15
XM2 Light - £50
--
Around £2015, but Creed has like 3 Mini-DV Handycams which were probably around £300 each making it closer to £3000 ($5,850)
09 February 2007, 16:30 UTC#35
waaaoooww! monOUs camera rocks! waaaaoooow!
09 February 2007, 16:38 UTC#36
about 5-6K. Give or take.
09 February 2007, 16:59 UTC#37
QUOTE(Wilbur @ Feb 8 2007, 09:33 PM) [snapback]419575[/snapback]
Who cares?
09 February 2007, 17:43 UTC#38
QUOTE(That Banned Guy. @ Feb 9 2007, 12:59 PM) [snapback]419761[/snapback]
QUOTE(Wilbur @ Feb 8 2007, 09:33 PM) [snapback]419575[/snapback]
Who cares?
next we can see who has the biggest dick so I can stop wondering
09 February 2007, 18:12 UTC#39
its not how much your camera costs, its what you do with it that counts
09 February 2007, 18:13 UTC#40
It really is. Look at vode, he has cameras almost identical to what I used to have and he's filmed tons of better shit.
09 February 2007, 18:21 UTC#41
but if you have a camera that has shitty quality its a lot harder to watch and better for the viewer if somehtign was filmed with a better camera.. although a 2000$ cam will look the same as a 500$
09 February 2007, 18:26 UTC#42
minidv cams produce watchible quality videos, from $200 ones to $2000, it dont really matter unless your tryin to create an atmosphere, but thats really for short films, and you can do most of that in editing. what isnt watchible is Bad film making = camera work and editing.
09 February 2007, 18:34 UTC#43
yeah I know but besides quiality the more expensive cameras can pick up audio a lot better atleast my camera picks up adio a good 10 times better than my old one and from a further distance away. also I think with the "handle bar" you can get alot better shots and angles and its easier to move while fimling.
09 February 2007, 20:42 UTC#44
my cam was about £2000 including accesaries.
09 February 2007, 20:50 UTC#45
2x shitty Mini DV Cameras = £160 each
-1 came with crapy video software which I attempted to use but failed!!
£50 for fish lens
fuck all for tapes because work I a skateboard shop and I get them for free

errrr that it
Yeah we have shit stuff,but no one gonna nick its that crap
09 February 2007, 21:11 UTC#46
QUOTE(ill-advised @ Feb 9 2007, 07:26 PM) [snapback]419803[/snapback]
minidv cams produce watchible quality videos, from $200 ones to $2000, it dont really matter unless your tryin to create an atmosphere, but thats really for short films, and you can do most of that in editing. what isnt watchible is Bad film making = camera work and editing.
agreed, although it is good to have something that performs well in low light...I can't stand the grain cheaper cams produce.
10 February 2007, 08:41 UTC#47
My new camera is a Canon GL2 for $3100. with wide angle lens $400. and extended length battery $120. $100 carry safe case.
My other cam is a Canon ZX90 for $999. wide angle lens for $70. Extra battery $50.
$200 on wireless mics.
$150 on external hard drive
no one really knows on tapes or props.
total around...$5,300.