Forum index / General Chat / Hey Austalia, Have Some More Convicts

Hey Austalia, Have Some More Convicts

16 posts · page 1 of 1

post #1
02 February 2007, 08:37 UTC#1
QUOTE
Convicts bound for Botany Bay

By Fiona Hudson in London

February 02, 2007 12:04am
Article from: The Daily Telegraph

A PLANE-load of prisoners from British jails could be headed Down Under more than 200 years after Britain first sent boats full of convicts to Australia.

With the UK on the brink of a jail overcrowding crisis, Prime Minister Tony Blair has vowed "all options" are open to solve the problem - including sending hundreds of expat prisoners home to serve their sentences.

Australia's High Commissioner to the UK Richard Alston made light of the the prospect of convicts again landing on Aussie soil at a recent function. However the crisis is no laughing matter for Home Secretary John Reid.

Cells are so full he last week wrote a letter to judges urging them to lock away only the most violent and dangerous criminals. The plea brought Mr Reid under immediate fire but he says he has no choice but to propose an array of radical solutions to the cell shortages.

Suggestions include the "nuclear option" of releasing some prisoners early; sending 11,000 foreign nationals to finish their sentences at home; and creating a waiting list for jail spaces.

Other emergency proposals include renting prison ships to house criminals offshore and converting an RAF camp to house prisoners.

The maximum capacity of British jails is 80,716. The number of inmates topped 80,000 for the first time in November.

The rapidly bulging prison population has been blamed on the 2003 Justice Act, which was expected to see serious criminals locked up for longer and fewer jailed for minor crimes.


Original Story

haha enjoy our worst australia. To be honest I think the government is pissed about the cricket.
post #2
02 February 2007, 08:53 UTC#2
They'll just lock them up in the middle of the desert away from mainsteam society anyway (like what they do with illegal imigrants). And then when the sentences are up they'll probably just get sent back.

post #3
02 February 2007, 09:00 UTC#3
and those that break out die of thirst and get eaten by vultures and the circle of life begins again.
post #4
02 February 2007, 10:09 UTC#4
So they're sending the expats back? Big deal. They're all Australians they're sending back anyway.

Send em all. Look what the first batch acheived in only 200 years. Built the best fucking country on earth from nothing.
post #5
02 February 2007, 11:45 UTC#5
I love Australia. <3
post #6
02 February 2007, 12:40 UTC#6
hell you want the other 80,000?

cause we sure as hell don't :happy:

thanks elliot. ill call the home secretary now and tell em that we can release all our prisoners into your care :tongue:
post #7
02 February 2007, 22:11 UTC#7
At least they'll have some decent weather. Send em over.
post #8
02 February 2007, 23:34 UTC#8
QUOTE(ELLIOT @ Feb 2 2007, 01:09 PM) [snapback]417427[/snapback]

Look what the first batch acheived in only 200 years. Built the best fucking country on earth from nothing.



And 200 years really isn't that long a time.
post #9
02 February 2007, 23:43 UTC#9
I dunno, America's pretty sweet and we've been around for about that long. :unsure:

Only we were built mainly by Britain's best and brightest people. Kind of weird that 200 years ago, both Britain's intellectual best and criminally disruptive were sent out to unsettled lands and the place with the convicts turned out a lot better.
post #10
02 February 2007, 23:43 UTC#10


I like this idea. Old retired oil tankers and cruise ships being renovated could hold a shitload of criminals. And escape/security would be much easier considering they'd be miles and miles out in the ocean.
post #11
02 February 2007, 23:59 UTC#11
QUOTE(ELLIOT @ Feb 2 2007, 10:11 PM) [snapback]417537[/snapback]

At least they'll have some decent weather. Send em over.

hehehe you got that right. I may just kill someone I don't like for the free holiday.
post #12
03 February 2007, 00:18 UTC#12
QUOTE(RayBorDumB @ Feb 3 2007, 11:43 AM) [snapback]417557[/snapback]

I dunno, America's pretty sweet and we've been around for about that long. :unsure:




I thought it was settled 500-600 years ago.

200 years is fuck all. Its only a few generations.
post #13
03 February 2007, 00:27 UTC#13
QUOTE(RayBorDumB @ Feb 3 2007, 12:43 AM) [snapback]417557[/snapback]

I dunno, America's pretty sweet and we've been around for about that long. :unsure:

Only we were built mainly by Britain's best and brightest people. Kind of weird that 200 years ago, both Britain's intellectual best and criminally disruptive were sent out to unsettled lands and the place with the convicts turned out a lot better.

The term convict is a bit misleading though, people were stealing bread to feed their starving families and getting locked up for it. Hence the reason why englands prisons were over-crowding at the time. Not as if all the 'convicts' were people up for charges like rape and murder, all though I'm sure there would have been a few.

But yeah I can see the irony in what you're saying though.
post #14
03 February 2007, 16:27 UTC#14
QUOTE(ELLIOT @ Feb 3 2007, 01:11 AM) [snapback]417537[/snapback]

At least they'll have some decent weather. Send em over.

:cool: :biggrin:
post #15
03 February 2007, 17:26 UTC#15
Australia's nice Elliot, but you've only bothered to build on the outline really.

Come on son, finish the job, fill in the gaps ;p