Forum index / General Chat / Youtube To Share Ad Profits With Users!

Youtube To Share Ad Profits With Users!

17 posts · page 1 of 1

post #1
28 January 2007, 07:25 UTC#1
QUOTE
DAVOS, Switzerland (AP) - Chad Hurley, co-founder of YouTube, said Saturday that his wildly successful site will start sharing revenue with its millions of users.

Hurley said one of the major proposed innovations is a way to allow users to be paid for content. YouTube, which was sold to Google for $1.65 billion in November, has become an Internet phenomenon since it began to catch on in late 2005. Some 70 million videos are viewed on the site each day.

"We are getting an audience large enough where we have an opportunity to support creativity, to foster creativity through sharing revenue with our users," Hurley said. "So in the coming months we are going to be opening that up."

Hurley, who at 30 is one of the youngest Internet multimillionaires, gave no details of how much users might receive, or what mechanism would be used.

In October 2005, Revver - which like YouTube offers video clips online - announced plans to attach advertising to user-submitted videos and give their creators a cut of the profits. Revver has said it would split the ad revenue evenly with content creators.

Hurley said that when YouTube started, he and the site's other co-founders - Steve Chen and Jawed Karim - felt revenue-sharing would build a community of users motivated by making money, rather than their love of videos.

But that as the site has grown, the three, who continue to run the company, have come to see financial remuneration as a way of improving content.

Hurley spoke on the last full day of the World Economic Forum, which brings together the world's political, social and business leaders for a five-day gathering on the problems facing the world.


http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070127/D8MTOAFO0.html

Looks like more $ for Mr Safety.
post #2
28 January 2007, 18:53 UTC#2
I'm all for this. But I just wonder how it would work. I mean, would it be like other sites that pay for videos that are shown on the homepage, or would everyone get paid for their videos? I mean, its not as if the Youtube people could review every video to see if it was worthy or not?
post #3
28 January 2007, 18:55 UTC#3
Thats cool, I've used 'Revver' for quite a while cos of they pay me each time someone watches a video and it would be even better if YouTube did this too. :-)
post #4
28 January 2007, 18:59 UTC#4
What so, anyone can make some bullshit video of them sitting in front of their webcam miming along to "Welcome To The Black Parade" and actually make money?

I don't like it, I reckon only decent content - like Juvie said - stuff that's shown on the homepage should be able to make a bit out of their videos.
post #5
28 January 2007, 19:32 UTC#5
I reckon it will do well for the community, people want more $, they need to get more views so they produce better videos.
post #6
28 January 2007, 19:36 UTC#6
Hmm, I see it going the opposite way. Kids want to make a quick bit of cash, so they film their dog chasing its tail for three minutes.

Doesn't matter how many people watch it, if you make SOME money, then you're better off than you were before. Repeat forty or fifty times until the guys in charge realise it's a bit of a gay idea.
post #7
28 January 2007, 20:19 UTC#7
QUOTE(Liam @ Jan 28 2007, 08:36 PM) [snapback]415675[/snapback]

Hmm, I see it going the opposite way. Kids want to make a quick bit of cash, so they film their dog chasing its tail for three minutes.

Doesn't matter how many people watch it, if you make SOME money, then you're better off than you were before. Repeat forty or fifty times until the guys in charge realise it's a bit of a gay idea.



but why is an easy opportunity for kids to make money a bad thing? there'll still be good videos up there, you will just have to sift through the dog chasing shit.
post #8
28 January 2007, 22:56 UTC#8
could be good I guess

never know I may actually be able to make a dollar fifty
post #9
29 January 2007, 04:27 UTC#9
Shit, free money's ALWAYS good in my books.
post #10
29 January 2007, 05:10 UTC#10
Im down lol
post #11
29 January 2007, 14:45 UTC#11
This should be alright really...Some of my videos have had thousands of views so I ain't complaining..
post #12
29 January 2007, 17:42 UTC#12
Let the games begin... MORTAL KOMBAT! lol... I think the revenue sharing is going to cause a bad change in a lot of people because we all know the new talent is going to come out of the wood work and replace the untalented people who are currently on the "most subscribed" list. You can guarantee a lot of drama will be going down between big named users for popularity.

I knew about this about 2 months before the announcement though. It's only going to be about $7 (US) per 1,000 views. That's really not much.
post #13
29 January 2007, 19:24 UTC#13
Wont this be like Break.com,they give you money they make from the Ads but then they calm the ownership of the videos?
post #14
30 January 2007, 05:33 UTC#14
QUOTE(adrenalinejunkies @ Jan 29 2007, 03:24 PM) [snapback]415855[/snapback]

Wont this be like Break.com,they give you money they make from the Ads but then they calm the ownership of the videos?

yeah, probably! that would suck so badly.
post #15
30 January 2007, 06:01 UTC#15
this is gonna result in a fuck load of people stealing videos and claiming them to their own to make $$$.

Always watermark your shit and do it good.
post #16
30 January 2007, 15:44 UTC#16
QUOTE(88v_PAUL @ Jan 30 2007, 06:33 AM) [snapback]416046[/snapback]

QUOTE(adrenalinejunkies @ Jan 29 2007, 03:24 PM) [snapback]415855[/snapback]

Wont this be like Break.com,they give you money they make from the Ads but then they calm the ownership of the videos?

yeah, probably! that would suck so badly.


I dont think you tube would run it like that.


QUOTE(WEAK @ Jan 30 2007, 07:01 AM) [snapback]416047[/snapback]

this is gonna result in a fuck load of people stealing videos and claiming them to their own to make $$$.

Always watermark your shit and do it good.



and yeah this is true, but u reckon they are ganan try and sort summit out to stop this?
post #17
31 January 2007, 01:38 UTC#17
when you say "watermark" your shit good. what you mean? give some tips.