QUOTE(Adem @ Jul 12 2006, 12:10 AM) [snapback]359793[/snapback]
hardcore is what you classify as constant screaming aka shit.
post-hardcore is what I like, in which it's screaming at parts, and melodic/normal singing at other parts. like underoath, or silverstein. prime examples. we all like different stuff, but you don't see me calling ska shit? maybe because I like ska as well. is that all you like?
Ahh. Well then I can stand some post-hardcore. I just cant listen to non stop vocal-beating. And I listen to a whole spectrum of music, mainly just the stuff that gets me pumped up and or dancing.
QUOTE(Mono @ Jul 12 2006, 12:13 AM) [snapback]359795[/snapback]
QUOTE(FV Tyler @ Jul 12 2006, 06:01 AM) [snapback]359785[/snapback]
QUOTE(Adem @ Jul 11 2006, 09:51 PM) [snapback]359730[/snapback]
who calls it screamo anyway? to me there's a labeling system, and in that genre there's hardcore and post-hardcore. hardcore is what they call screamo, which is so lame.
Okay. but in Hardcore and post-hardcore (wtf is the difference?), both scream the shit out of themselves. Therefore classifying, in my book, as screamo. AKA shit.
Each to their own. Personally I find most Ska kinda dull and repetitive but I don't dismiss it as shit.
I hate people like you who simply lable things as shit just because they don't like it. It's something I'd expect from a little kid.
In my opinion, it
is shit. I've taken the time to actually listen to a few songs my friends like that are like this, and I cant stand any of them. There's no rythm to screamo. Its fast, machine gun, then breakdown (which also has no beat what so ever).
I label this as shit,
because I dont like it. I'm not saying you cant like it. I'm not saying that this is shit to you. I'm saying it's shit to me.
So let me rephrase without pissing anyone else off.
Screamo and Hardcore sound like shit to me.