post #1,261
28 September 2007, 15:48 UTC#1,261
Can't go wrong with the awesome duo of Han Solo and Chewbacca.
Forum index / General Chat / I Just Bought...
I Just Bought...
7,433 posts · page 43 of 248
post #1,262
28 September 2007, 16:07 UTC#1,262
I always thought Boba Fett was the man because he had a big 'T' on his helmet.
post #1,263
28 September 2007, 16:12 UTC#1,263
QUOTE(Sir Liam of PWN @ Sep 28 2007, 07:48 PM) [snapback]440233[/snapback]
Can't go wrong with the awesome duo of Han Solo and Chewbacca.
I beg to differ!
External image not preserved — inspect source: http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/thumb/2/2a/260px-JabbaTheHutt.jpg
post #1,264
28 September 2007, 16:19 UTC#1,264
Boba Fett and Jabba are both pretty cool, but let's look at two crucial facts:
Fett was killed by a blind man.
Jabba was killed by Carrie Fisher wearing a metal bikini.
Don't sound too awesome to me.
Fett was killed by a blind man.
Jabba was killed by Carrie Fisher wearing a metal bikini.
Don't sound too awesome to me.
post #1,265
28 September 2007, 16:23 UTC#1,265
Carrie Fisher wearing a metal bikini is the ultimate wet dream of any self respecting Star Wars nerd in the world. So beware before you start messing around with that kind of a masses of positive karma
post #1,266
28 September 2007, 16:24 UTC#1,266
Fett was killed by the sarlac I believe...
post #1,267
28 September 2007, 18:17 UTC#1,267
post #1,268
28 September 2007, 18:21 UTC#1,268
QUOTE(cIRca @ Sep 28 2007, 05:24 PM) [snapback]440240[/snapback]
Fett was killed by the sarlac I believe...
Only because he was knocked in. What, did it jump up and hunt him down?
And far be it from me to detract the merits of Princess Leia in a steel bikini, but come on; you're a galactic crime lord. If you can't even fight off an unarmed and unarmoured slave, you don't deserve to be the centrepiece of a figure collection.
post #1,269
28 September 2007, 18:22 UTC#1,269
QUOTE(loud music crab @ Sep 28 2007, 06:35 AM) [snapback]440191[/snapback]
QUOTE(Davey Rotten @ Sep 28 2007, 07:56 AM) [snapback]440178[/snapback]
QUOTE(loud music crab @ Sep 27 2007, 09:26 PM) [snapback]440154[/snapback]
QUOTE(Davey Rotten @ Sep 28 2007, 12:16 AM) [snapback]440138[/snapback]
Saw you were playing it online. Me and Joe were like
whyyy?
cause it's an amazing game and we don't own it.
you can come play anytime you want.post #1,270
28 September 2007, 18:46 UTC#1,270
QUOTE(Sir Liam of PWN @ Sep 28 2007, 08:21 PM) [snapback]440266[/snapback]
QUOTE(cIRca @ Sep 28 2007, 05:24 PM) [snapback]440240[/snapback]
Fett was killed by the sarlac I believe...
Only because he was knocked in. What, did it jump up and hunt him down?
If you trip over your shoelace into a vat of acid it wasn't the shoelace that killed you, it was the acid.
And the sarlac actually did drag him in, in the digitally remastered version anyway.
post #1,271
28 September 2007, 21:21 UTC#1,271
QUOTE(cIRca @ Sep 28 2007, 07:46 PM) [snapback]440269[/snapback]
QUOTE(Sir Liam of PWN @ Sep 28 2007, 08:21 PM) [snapback]440266[/snapback]
QUOTE(cIRca @ Sep 28 2007, 05:24 PM) [snapback]440240[/snapback]
Fett was killed by the sarlac I believe...
Only because he was knocked in. What, did it jump up and hunt him down?
If you trip over your shoelace into a vat of acid it wasn't the shoelace that killed you, it was the acid.
And the sarlac actually did drag him in, in the digitally remastered version anyway.
He still failed to avoid the attack of a blind man. That's pretty fucking weak.
Verdict: pwnt.
EDIT:
External image not preserved — inspect source: http://www.releaseinfo.net/ri/cover/new_velka/1174237564-540331_57490_front.jpg
post #1,272
28 September 2007, 21:22 UTC#1,272
I love the heated debates that happen on HGF
post #1,273
28 September 2007, 21:58 UTC#1,273
QUOTE(Sir Liam of PWN @ Sep 28 2007, 11:21 PM) [snapback]440279[/snapback]
QUOTE(cIRca @ Sep 28 2007, 07:46 PM) [snapback]440269[/snapback]
QUOTE(Sir Liam of PWN @ Sep 28 2007, 08:21 PM) [snapback]440266[/snapback]
QUOTE(cIRca @ Sep 28 2007, 05:24 PM) [snapback]440240[/snapback]
Fett was killed by the sarlac I believe...
Only because he was knocked in. What, did it jump up and hunt him down?
If you trip over your shoelace into a vat of acid it wasn't the shoelace that killed you, it was the acid.
And the sarlac actually did drag him in, in the digitally remastered version anyway.
He still failed to avoid the attack of a blind man. That's pretty fucking weak.
Verdict: pwnt.
EDIT:
External image not preserved — inspect source: http://www.releaseinfo.net/ri/cover/new_velka/1174237564-540331_57490_front.jpg
Yeah well Chewy was wooly.
I love that game.
post #1,274
28 September 2007, 22:00 UTC#1,274
Brand new for a tenner. Can't go wrong.
post #1,275
28 September 2007, 22:11 UTC#1,275
post #1,276
28 September 2007, 22:15 UTC#1,276
QUOTE(cIRca @ Sep 28 2007, 03:13 PM) [snapback]440212[/snapback]
Not bad for a days work.
Where
Which do you like the best? vx2000, xl2, hc7?
post #1,277
28 September 2007, 22:34 UTC#1,277
I have always hated Canon because they don't seem to take the time to lay things out so it's easy to use. The xl2 just covered in buttons which is confusing as piss. (Not to mention the fact I am unable to find nightshot on it because it's just that confusing.)
The xl2 is awesome for quality though as can be expected from a 3CCD, but if it were a competition the VX would definately win as a 3CCD camera.
The HC7 uses a CMOS sensor instead of CCD which is better in terms of battery life, not to mention the colour on the HC7 is stunning and beats the piss out of the others, the low light is better on the VX, then HC7 and then xl2 in my opinion.
HD wins for me just because its up to date and it does everything I would need a camera for, not to mention just how good the quality is for the price.
The xl2 is awesome for quality though as can be expected from a 3CCD, but if it were a competition the VX would definately win as a 3CCD camera.
The HC7 uses a CMOS sensor instead of CCD which is better in terms of battery life, not to mention the colour on the HC7 is stunning and beats the piss out of the others, the low light is better on the VX, then HC7 and then xl2 in my opinion.
HD wins for me just because its up to date and it does everything I would need a camera for, not to mention just how good the quality is for the price.
post #1,278
28 September 2007, 22:41 UTC#1,278
U have an xl2?
can u give me list of all the cams gomp films with?
I got to use a gl2 the other day and I accually did not like them very much, the LCD is way to small but If u could get a decent price on one then theyed be ok.
can u give me list of all the cams gomp films with?
I got to use a gl2 the other day and I accually did not like them very much, the LCD is way to small but If u could get a decent price on one then theyed be ok.
post #1,279
29 September 2007, 01:29 UTC#1,279
A box of 18 bottles of Woodstock Bourbon & Cola. And a triple cheeseburger from Burger King. It's going to be a good night haha.
post #1,280
29 September 2007, 01:58 UTC#1,280
LOL at nightshot on a canon.
post #1,281
29 September 2007, 05:19 UTC#1,281
QUOTE(cIRca @ Sep 28 2007, 09:13 AM) [snapback]440212[/snapback]
Wont make your vids any better Image file not present in the recovered backup
post #1,282
29 September 2007, 07:42 UTC#1,282
QUOTE(cIRca @ Sep 29 2007, 12:34 AM) [snapback]440290[/snapback]
I have always hated Canon because they don't seem to take the time to lay things out so it's easy to use. The xl2 just covered in buttons which is confusing as piss. (Not to mention the fact I am unable to find nightshot on it because it's just that confusing.)
The xl2 is awesome for quality though as can be expected from a 3CCD, but if it were a competition the VX would definately win as a 3CCD camera.
The HC7 uses a CMOS sensor instead of CCD which is better in terms of battery life, not to mention the colour on the HC7 is stunning and beats the piss out of the others, the low light is better on the VX, then HC7 and then xl2 in my opinion.
HD wins for me just because its up to date and it does everything I would need a camera for, not to mention just how good the quality is for the price.
Cool, Im probably sticking on my decision then. Might get one of those sexy cameras when the price comes down.
QUOTE(jonb @ Sep 29 2007, 12:41 AM) [snapback]440292[/snapback]
U have an xl2?
can u give me list of all the cams gomp films with?
I got to use a gl2 the other day and I accually did not like them very much, the LCD is way to small but If u could get a decent price on one then theyed be ok.
I dont think he ahs xl2, it was my bad. Its just that canon gl2 is gl2 in europe, but in usa its xm. Gets kind of confusing Image file not present in the recovered backup
post #1,283
29 September 2007, 07:48 UTC#1,283
QUOTE(vode @ Sep 29 2007, 03:42 AM) [snapback]440312[/snapback]
QUOTE(cIRca @ Sep 29 2007, 12:34 AM) [snapback]440290[/snapback]
I have always hated Canon because they don't seem to take the time to lay things out so it's easy to use. The xl2 just covered in buttons which is confusing as piss. (Not to mention the fact I am unable to find nightshot on it because it's just that confusing.)
The xl2 is awesome for quality though as can be expected from a 3CCD, but if it were a competition the VX would definately win as a 3CCD camera.
The HC7 uses a CMOS sensor instead of CCD which is better in terms of battery life, not to mention the colour on the HC7 is stunning and beats the piss out of the others, the low light is better on the VX, then HC7 and then xl2 in my opinion.
HD wins for me just because its up to date and it does everything I would need a camera for, not to mention just how good the quality is for the price.
Cool, Im probably sticking on my decision then. Might get one of those sexy cameras when the price comes down.
QUOTE(jonb @ Sep 29 2007, 12:41 AM) [snapback]440292[/snapback]
U have an xl2?
can u give me list of all the cams gomp films with?
I got to use a gl2 the other day and I accually did not like them very much, the LCD is way to small but If u could get a decent price on one then theyed be ok.
I dont think he ahs xl2, it was my bad. Its just that canon gl2 is gl2 in europe, but in usa its xm. Gets kind of confusing Image file not present in the recovered backup
I think its the other way around gl2 in usa xm2 in europe
post #1,284
29 September 2007, 08:25 UTC#1,284
QUOTE(Funk Master Shiestorz @ Sep 29 2007, 07:19 AM) [snapback]440305[/snapback]
QUOTE(cIRca @ Sep 28 2007, 09:13 AM) [snapback]440212[/snapback]
Wont make your vids any better Image file not present in the recovered backup
Sorry Rico.
post #1,285
29 September 2007, 13:53 UTC#1,285
yeah that cam dont have nightshot, thats a sony thing.
post #1,286
29 September 2007, 14:01 UTC#1,286
With a light you can usually get on just fine, obviously without the subtlety element.
As I found out, to my dismay.
But everyone knows THAT story.
As I found out, to my dismay.
But everyone knows THAT story.
post #1,287
29 September 2007, 14:58 UTC#1,287
QUOTE(jeez_pf @ Sep 29 2007, 12:11 AM) [snapback]440285[/snapback]
Cool man, I just bought some tooty frooties too.
External image not preserved — inspect source: http://www.sweetstall.com/acatalog/Tooty-Fruities.jpg
post #1,288
29 September 2007, 16:07 UTC#1,288
post #1,289
29 September 2007, 18:37 UTC#1,289
QUOTE(loud music crab @ Sep 29 2007, 03:58 PM) [snapback]440334[/snapback]
QUOTE(jeez_pf @ Sep 29 2007, 12:11 AM) [snapback]440285[/snapback]
Cool man, I just bought some tooty frooties too.
External image not preserved — inspect source: http://www.sweetstall.com/acatalog/Tooty-Fruities.jpg
I don't know why but I laughed my ass off for like 5 mins at that.
also I bought myself this jacket yesterday:
External image not preserved — inspect source: http://www.chainreactioncycles.com/Images/Models/Full/17193.jpg
comfiest warmest motherfucking jacket I ever bought.
post #1,290
29 September 2007, 18:50 UTC#1,290
I can't wait until it's jacket weather here in the US....