05 October 2008, 13:04 UTC#4,321
QUOTE(Skipper @ Oct 5 2008, 04:34 AM) [snapback]512451[/snapback]
QUOTE(ILL-FILMZ @ Oct 4 2008, 07:08 PM) [snapback]512362[/snapback]
footbawls ghey
No, just fags that cant handle the national game are ghey.
or the men that get upset when someone insults a 'game' are ghey
05 October 2008, 14:14 UTC#4,322
QUOTE(ILL-FILMZ @ Oct 5 2008, 03:04 PM) [snapback]512564[/snapback]
QUOTE(Skipper @ Oct 5 2008, 04:34 AM) [snapback]512451[/snapback]
QUOTE(ILL-FILMZ @ Oct 4 2008, 07:08 PM) [snapback]512362[/snapback]
footbawls ghey
No, just fags that cant handle the national game are ghey.
or the men that get upset when someone insults a 'game' are ghey
Wasn't upset, football is great, it's science.
05 October 2008, 14:17 UTC#4,323
science is ghey
06 October 2008, 18:32 UTC#4,324
A weber d a t 34/34 carburetor
06 October 2008, 18:40 UTC#4,325
If SkullCandy headphones really are awesome sound quality then I am totally getting some.
Just dropped mine in a bath full of bleach.
06 October 2008, 18:43 UTC#4,326
I dunno about the sound but apparently the workmanship on them is pretty shit. Loads of my girlfriend's mates bought a pair since they were a bit of a fad in Sweden but they snapped, ear-pad-cushion things fell off, wires came out of the socket etc.
06 October 2008, 18:45 UTC#4,327
had mine for 6 months or so now...good sound for the price.
06 October 2008, 18:46 UTC#4,328
Must be the shoddy Scandinavian craftsmen.
06 October 2008, 18:51 UTC#4,329
External image not preserved — inspect source: http://www.mundodigital.info/images/gi_rasta.jpgI think I'll get these then, I need a decent pair for my course too so it'll double up as a hip and trendy fashion piece.
06 October 2008, 20:33 UTC#4,330
those are the black people version.
06 October 2008, 20:36 UTC#4,331
They go with the shit sunglasses.
06 October 2008, 20:43 UTC#4,332
Damn those look sick.
06 October 2008, 21:00 UTC#4,333
Yup.
06 October 2008, 21:26 UTC#4,334
06 October 2008, 22:38 UTC#4,335
External image not preserved — inspect source: http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/6435/dcrpc100vs1.gif Sony PC-100. Needed something that was small and had nightshot, this was at the top of the list. Got it on ebay for $250, slightly used. Kinda sucks as it takes forever to focus but its easy to bring along. Shitty footage is better than no footage.
07 October 2008, 00:10 UTC#4,336
QUOTE(WEAK @ Oct 7 2008, 01:38 AM) [snapback]512910[/snapback]
External image not preserved — inspect source: http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/6435/dcrpc100vs1.gif Sony PC-100. Needed something that was small and had nightshot, this was at the top of the list. Got it on ebay for $250, slightly used. Kinda sucks as it takes forever to focus but its easy to bring along. Shitty footage is better than no footage.
Should have got a Sony A1.
There tiny, and have great NV plus it's HDV/DVCAM switchable.
07 October 2008, 00:37 UTC#4,337
But the PC is like fourth of the sixe of a1?
07 October 2008, 09:54 UTC#4,338
QUOTE(vode @ Oct 7 2008, 03:37 AM) [snapback]512934[/snapback]
But the PC is like fourth of the sixe of a1?
No it's not.
I have a PC-100e. It was my first ever camera.
07 October 2008, 10:45 UTC#4,339
Link to A1?
07 October 2008, 18:58 UTC#4,340
QUOTE(DEX @ Oct 7 2008, 12:10 AM) [snapback]512920[/snapback]
QUOTE(WEAK @ Oct 7 2008, 01:38 AM) [snapback]512910[/snapback]
External image not preserved — inspect source: http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/6435/dcrpc100vs1.gif Sony PC-100. Needed something that was small and had nightshot, this was at the top of the list. Got it on ebay for $250, slightly used. Kinda sucks as it takes forever to focus but its easy to bring along. Shitty footage is better than no footage.
Should have got a Sony A1.
There tiny, and have great NV plus it's HDV/DVCAM switchable.
Didnt know those had night shot, none the less though it's too big and too expensive for what I need. Its gotta be able to fit in a pocket, and I didnt want to spend more than $500 as my friend will be borrowing it often and its prone to getting damaged.
07 October 2008, 21:25 UTC#4,342
COULD YOU PLZ MAKE THE IMAGES BIGGER?
07 October 2008, 21:31 UTC#4,343
I took them on my phone so I didnt tihnk they would be that big, but once I posted them I was like "fuck it... I want to eat" so I did...
08 October 2008, 00:57 UTC#4,344
QUOTE(j0nes @ Oct 7 2008, 04:25 PM) [snapback]513109[/snapback]
COULD YOU PLZ MAKE THE IMAGES BIGGER?
08 October 2008, 08:46 UTC#4,345
Nice place man
08 October 2008, 10:05 UTC#4,346
And the big pictures only make it seem bigger Image file not present in the recovered backup
What size tv is that?
08 October 2008, 11:36 UTC#4,347
1,072 inches.
08 October 2008, 12:19 UTC#4,348
QUOTE(benCKa @ Oct 8 2008, 06:05 AM) [snapback]513186[/snapback]
And the big pictures only make it seem bigger Image file not present in the recovered backup
What size tv is that?
its a 42 inch u blind fuck.
08 October 2008, 12:37 UTC#4,349
External image not preserved — inspect source: http://i00.twenga.com/p/94/20/19420vb.pngTRV-33e
To replace my fucked up and falling apart piece of shit camera I had before.
All I need now is a 30-37mm ring and im ready to roll. lol
08 October 2008, 13:45 UTC#4,350
QUOTE(benCKa @ Oct 8 2008, 11:05 AM) [snapback]513186[/snapback]
And the big pictures only make it seem bigger Image file not present in the recovered backup
What size tv is that?
50" in the living room and 42" in the bedroom
