QUOTE(Liam @ Jun 11 2006, 07:36 PM) [snapback]345307[/snapback]
QUOTE(gman @ Jun 11 2006, 06:24 PM) [snapback]345301[/snapback]
QUOTE(Wilbur @ Jun 11 2006, 07:21 PM) [snapback]345298[/snapback]
What'd you think gman?
I definately don't believe in time travel, neither do I believe in the theory that time, and gravity have any relation to each other.
The most popular theory is if you went faster than the speed of light, you'd go back in time is bullshit. The faster you go, the quicker you get to a destination, period.
The thing with time travel theories is that we're trying to work out something we know nothing about, using facts we know nothing about.
For example, how can theories about going faster than the speed of light being tested if nothing can reach those speeds? Einstein said that sub-light travel would result in infinite mass, essentially destroying whatever you're moving.
However, there have been some theories about using quantum mechanics and time as a fourth dimension. HG Wells came up with the idea of time being the fourth dimension in his book The Time Machine. He put forth that no matter an object's height, width and breadth, if it lasts for zero units of time then it does not truly exist. An object must possess a dimension of time in order to exist in our universe.
Therefore, if we could somehow devise a way of travelling along the lines of the fourth dimension, we would essentially be travelling through time. But that could be a while off yet (see first paragraph).
In case you hadn't noticed, I find this a bit interesting. I have a couple of books on the possibility of time travel if we take Einstein's laws to be true.
The fourth dimension is purely hypothetical, how do we know it exists? As for the "sub light travel destroying everything in its path" theory, do we know this? Has anyone ever analysed if light destroyes anything in it's path? As far as we are aware, it doesn't. Sure light may not have "physical" properties, but as we can't see an atom and never will, it's just another vague speculation.
I just can't see, logistically how you can travel to a moment that doesn't exist. Does time exist? Or is it purely a made up thing to bring order and structure humans crave into our lives. Is time merely nothing more than a human creation?
Are these theories created in such a complex manner because the creators knew we'd never be able to disprove these theories?
QUOTE(Liam @ Jun 11 2006, 08:08 PM) [snapback]345317[/snapback]
I've spent ages reading through the website in its entirety, and there's some fucking interesting stuff.
The time traveller, John Titor, tells people what the world will be like in the next 15 years. Most notably, he says that world conflicts after 2004 will escalate, leading to American civil war in 2015.
In one post, he writes: "Are you really surprised to find out that Iraq has nukes now or is that just BS to whip everyone up into accepting the next war?"
Nothing special, you may think, except this post was made in February 2001, seven months before the attack on the World Trade Center and almost two years before investigations in Iraq were carried out to find WMDs.
In another February 2001 post, he answered two questions (the questions are in brackets):
((Does the civil war start in such a way that with this foreknowledge those willing will have time to remove themselves to safer locations.))
Yes. You will be forced to ask yourself how many civil rights you will give up to feel safe.
((Will you readily be able to identify the enemy.))
They will be the ones arresting and holding prople without due process.
Sends a fucking chill up my spine just writing this tbh. The connotations if this man is for real are huge. I'm definitely gonna look into this more.
Definately interesting, however could the individual whom wrote it have been in or be friends with a government agency worker whom had intelligence before any enactments?
Who knows, and I don't believe anyone will ever know. Most of science is nothing more than speculation.