Forum index / General Chat / Sex Offender Let Off

Sex Offender Let Off

9 posts · page 1 of 1

post #1
01 June 2006, 12:12 UTC#1
Source

QUOTE
SIDNEY, Neb. - A judge said a 5-foot-1 man convicted of sexually assaulting a child was too small to survive in prison, and gave him 10 years of probation instead.

His crimes deserved a long sentence, District Judge Kristine Cecava said, but she worried that Richard W. Thompson, 50, would be especially imperiled by prison dangers.

"You are a sex offender, and you did it to a child," she said.

But, she said, "That doesn't make you a hunter. You do not fit in that category."

Thompson will be electronically monitored the first four months of his probation, and he was told to never be alone with someone under age 18 or date or live with a woman whose children were under 18. Cecava also ordered Thompson to get rid of his pornography.

He faces 30 days of jail each year of his probation unless he follows its conditions closely.

"I want control of you until I know you have integrated change into your life," the judge told Thompson. "I truly hope that my bet on you being OK out in society is not misplaced."



No, I don't know why I just posted two topics about paedophiles, one after the other. I am wondering myself.
post #2
01 June 2006, 12:22 UTC#2
LMAO I wanna see him
post #3
01 June 2006, 12:27 UTC#3
Thats bull shit, he did the crime so he should serve the time like anyone else would. No justice came from that verdict at all.
post #4
01 June 2006, 12:29 UTC#4
QUOTE(x__made @ Jun 1 2006, 02:27 PM) [snapback]340082[/snapback]

Thats bull shit, he did the crime so he should serve the time like anyone else would. No justice came from that verdict at all.


I reckon all people who graffiti should lick the wall clean. You are infectious human waste, sir! Image file not present in the recovered backup

But yeah, it is total shit. His size should be even more reason to lock him up; it's obvious he will get made the wing bitch on his first night, so he'll obviously pay for his crimes in full!
post #5
01 June 2006, 12:34 UTC#5
I only filmed! :p

And yeah, he should go through what his victims went through.
post #6
01 June 2006, 12:36 UTC#6
QUOTE(x__made @ Jun 1 2006, 02:27 PM) [snapback]340082[/snapback]

Thats bull shit, he did the crime so he should serve the time like anyone else would. No justice came from that verdict at all.



I totally agree.

On a side note, isn't everyone you know called "Richard" small? I seriously know about 5 Richards and every one is under 5 foot 9"
post #7
01 June 2006, 12:38 UTC#7
Only one Richard spring to mind for me and he is a big cunt.
post #8
01 June 2006, 15:47 UTC#8
I know a Richard Darby, who was too fat to come to school every day.

On topic, this is just another case for criminals' human rights coming before their victims. They don't know for a fact that his being in prison would be a threat to his life (even if it is highly fucking likely). I don't see why criminals get any more than basic human rights.
If it looks like a paedophile might be a little unhappy serving their rape charge, they get moved to a nice comfy cell and given hot milk and a blanket.

If you ask me, criminals give up their rights when they commit their crimes. To do something like that to another human being then expect to be treated leniently when it looks like life in prison might be a bit nasty for them, guess what mate: tough shit. Makes you kinda regret all the kiddy fiddlin' now, I bet.
post #9
01 June 2006, 19:41 UTC#9
QUOTE(gman @ Jun 1 2006, 06:36 AM) [snapback]340090[/snapback]

QUOTE(x__made @ Jun 1 2006, 02:27 PM) [snapback]340082[/snapback]

Thats bull shit, he did the crime so he should serve the time like anyone else would. No justice came from that verdict at all.



I totally agree.

On a side note, isn't everyone you know called "Richard" small? I seriously know about 5 Richards and every one is under 5 foot 9"


Hmm...I only know one Richard. And he's a fucking FAGGOT.
Him in our old team, My Friend and Me. Being gay.