Forum index / General Homegrown / Judges or Voting?

Judges or Voting?

60 posts · page 1 of 2

post #1
12 May 2006, 09:49 UTC#1
Ok, theres alot of threads about the faceoff, but, just one more.

Would you prefer seperate judges to determine the winner or let the whole of HGF decide?
Up to you guys.

Judges? if so, then please state a member who you would like.
Obviously, the HGF community will vote in a poll for who they thought was the best.

Thanks.
post #2
12 May 2006, 09:53 UTC#2
Judges. Webby.
post #3
12 May 2006, 09:53 UTC#3
Shit, I voted for the wrong one :'(

Judges would be better, there's less room for bias that way
post #4
12 May 2006, 09:54 UTC#4
judges. me.
post #5
12 May 2006, 09:57 UTC#5
Patty I fixed your vote, and I agree with you.
post #6
12 May 2006, 09:58 UTC#6
But we need impartial judges

AKA - Not Webby
post #7
12 May 2006, 10:05 UTC#7
What you mean, he is impartial, think about it.

Impartial means you don't take sides, right? hmmmm.

Ex, I don't think you can vote yourself, even though you would be a good choice :D
post #8
12 May 2006, 10:12 UTC#8
QUOTE(BaZ_LnN @ May 12 2006, 10:05 AM) [snapback]330851[/snapback]

Ex, I don't think you can vote yourself, even though you would be a good choice :D


emm...why the hell not?

I am loyal and been here forever...only the admins/mods can vote?

or the people who get the most respect...
post #9
12 May 2006, 10:15 UTC#9
You have my respect, but I was just saying it might be unfair to just vote yourself in, but you would be a good choice anyways.

And no, anyone can vote/be a judge.
post #10
12 May 2006, 10:16 UTC#10
QUOTE(BaZ_LnN @ May 12 2006, 10:15 AM) [snapback]330865[/snapback]

You have my respect, but I was just saying it might be unfair to just vote yourself in, but you would be a good choice anyways.

And no, anyone can vote/be a judge.


ohh I thought you meant something else...nevermind :blush:

its just that our group is almost dead so I cant enter but I do want to be envolved Image file not present in the recovered backup
post #11
12 May 2006, 10:17 UTC#11
QUOTE
But we need impartial judges

AKA - Not Webby

Why not Webby?
post #12
12 May 2006, 10:18 UTC#12
Lol, nah, no worries. :D

Theres alot of the tasks you can do inside though, and I'm sure you can get someone to film some pranks.

I would enter, all I need is a cam, it sucks.
post #13
12 May 2006, 10:20 UTC#13
QUOTE
I would enter, all I need is a cam, it sucks.

Then you know the position I am in. :angry:
post #14
12 May 2006, 10:22 UTC#14
my camera is dead since yesterday :(
post #15
12 May 2006, 10:26 UTC#15
I vote ex and baz.
post #16
12 May 2006, 10:37 UTC#16
QUOTE(Word @ May 12 2006, 10:26 AM) [snapback]330875[/snapback]

I vote ex and baz.


<3

Image file not present in the recovered backup
post #17
12 May 2006, 11:51 UTC#17
Yer, ex and baz seem a god choice. However a good third judge would be WKH. Think about it, he has more expierencing at rating groups than most people here, what witht the hunt competitions and all. And he is pretty experienced and knows what he's talking about to a certain degree.

post #18
12 May 2006, 11:55 UTC#18
QUOTE(Shaun C-A @ May 12 2006, 12:51 PM) [snapback]330888[/snapback]

Yer, ex and baz seem a god choice. However a good third judge would be WKH. Think about it, he has more expierencing at rating groups than most people here, what witht the hunt competitions and all. And he is pretty experienced and knows what he's talking about to a certain degree.


think about it..........hes banned


I voted HGF Community

and fuck you patty, I was totally fair the last faceoff you little bitch
post #19
12 May 2006, 12:26 UTC#19
I wanna be a judge. :)
post #20
12 May 2006, 12:41 UTC#20
Judges, but the judges cant compete
post #21
12 May 2006, 13:27 UTC#21
Leroy from NMV
post #22
12 May 2006, 13:48 UTC#22
Judges is the worst idea ever, why does anyone want that?

Do exatcly what we did last year
post #23
12 May 2006, 13:55 UTC#23
QUOTE(Rico @ May 12 2006, 02:48 PM) [snapback]330921[/snapback]

Judges is the worst idea ever, why does anyone want that?

Do exatcly what we did last year


listen to rico for once
post #24
12 May 2006, 13:55 UTC#24
Community for sure. Worked fine last year.
post #25
12 May 2006, 16:16 UTC#25
I could judge if it goes that way, im not competing. whatever happened to that doa lunatiks or whatever thing I was supposed to judge anyway
post #26
12 May 2006, 16:17 UTC#26
Yeah, I think they stopped it, too focus on this.
Not sure.
post #27
12 May 2006, 16:21 UTC#27
QUOTE(BaZ_LnN @ May 12 2006, 10:05 AM) [snapback]330851[/snapback]

What you mean, he is impartial, think about it.

Impartial means you don't take sides, right? hmmmm.

Ex, I don't think you can vote yourself, even though you would be a good choice :D

Maybe I'm wrong...I was just thinking of the fact that he tends to flame the hell outta new teams, but that mainly because they're shit :D

So I guess he's be a pretty good judge
post #28
12 May 2006, 17:00 UTC#28
I wanna start the final thread, asap.

Is everyone happy with judges then?
I know it may seem a little unfair, cos' people won't be able to vote, and it's fun! :P But it would prolly end up being more fair.
Seems like most people wan't it anyways, even though last years worked.

Judges.... is this cool with everyone?

Thanks.
post #29
12 May 2006, 18:32 UTC#29
so I'm a judge? yeah? sweet.
post #30
12 May 2006, 18:43 UTC#30
ok im one too? corect? super.