Forum index / General Homegrown / HGF Freestyle 2006

HGF Freestyle 2006

30 posts · page 1 of 1

post #1
07 May 2006, 00:34 UTC#1
OK.

FMS, Duran and a few other people think this would be an awesome and better idea other than the faceoff:

Basically, it's just a fre3style (:D) mix tape.
All the groups who enter will work on their own freestyled video, working on camera angles, stunts, pranks, skits and any other creative shots which you guys can come up with....... and, anything else.


I know FMS, who suggested it too me likes it, and Duran.
So what are your opinions on this? ideas? do you guys like it? how would you like it too work?

I say the video should be judged by the content, the originality, creativity, editing and camering.
Since each group will specialize in one category, we need too make sure each group is judged upon their style of video.

Anyways,
Thoughts?
post #2
07 May 2006, 00:35 UTC#2
I prefer tasks. Sorry.
post #3
07 May 2006, 00:37 UTC#3
sorry but I dont really like the idea, id much rather have tasks
post #4
07 May 2006, 00:38 UTC#4
Because you guys lack originality.

This video can be skits, pranks, stunts, anything. Random footage, pictures or carp what ever.

This is a great idea because it can really show each groups style, get some prizes up in the bitch and everyone will be doing there best.

A bunch of brand new fresh mix ups is alot better than a bunch of played out tasks over and over.
post #5
07 May 2006, 00:40 UTC#5
Well.. a think you have a point, we always can join the hunt for tasks..

set up some rules, prize and shit, and we can go! :D
post #6
07 May 2006, 00:41 UTC#6
QUOTE(mako @ May 7 2006, 12:40 AM) [snapback]328244[/snapback]

Well.. a think you have a point, we always can join the hunt for tasks..

set up some rules, prize and shit, and we can go! :D


Exactly man :smile2:

Glad your down.
post #7
07 May 2006, 00:45 UTC#7
Yeah, this way we won't be expecting anything too come, instead of groups being restricted they are thinking of new, more creative ideas and getting into the main aspect of HG; Filming, camering and editing.

Instead of just fiming yourself get fucked up from a stunt in a poorly lit area and the camera is all shaky, it give groups motive too film more creative shots, based on their style.

So, yeah, if we get a few more thumbs up we can have this going a.s.a.p.
post #8
07 May 2006, 00:46 UTC#8
The faceoff is a good idea as it gets people filming,but I think this is a much better idea,it may not produce as many videos but alot better videos
post #9
07 May 2006, 00:49 UTC#9
The outline seems a tad sketchy.

Wouldn't this be the same as asking a group to realease an ordinary mixup?
post #10
07 May 2006, 00:51 UTC#10
Tasks are way better.

Anyone can make a mixup about anything anytime. Faceoffs where people compete against a mixup of set tasks are rarer.
post #11
07 May 2006, 00:54 UTC#11
Shit, I think gman has a better point now.

Im confused. :(
post #12
07 May 2006, 00:57 UTC#12
QUOTE(pattyt18 @ May 7 2006, 01:49 AM) [snapback]328253[/snapback]

The outline seems a tad sketchy.

Wouldn't this be the same as asking a group to realease an ordinary mixup?

100% True.

But, like most of the groups hardly ever think about the aspects of filming, the camera work and the editing... which like matches up with their style.

It all works out, maybe we can see some creative shit coming out, I mean it's completly freestlyed, there are no limitations this way, people can work more on their creative side, as the way you film... like angles and what not plays a big role in HG and can make a poo stunt look good.
post #13
07 May 2006, 01:01 UTC#13
What about a 50/50?

Some tasks, and some original videos in one great mixup?.
post #14
07 May 2006, 01:02 UTC#14
I'd say most people would prefer tasks, if we cut it down to several dozen great tasks that allow for improvisation and innovation then it'll be much better than a random mixup with no one knowing what they're doing.
post #15
07 May 2006, 01:02 UTC#15
QUOTE(BaZ_LnN @ May 7 2006, 12:57 AM) [snapback]328259[/snapback]

QUOTE(pattyt18 @ May 7 2006, 01:49 AM) [snapback]328253[/snapback]

The outline seems a tad sketchy.

Wouldn't this be the same as asking a group to realease an ordinary mixup?

100% True.

But, like most of the groups hardly ever think about the aspects of filming, the camera work and the editing... which like matches up with their style.

It all works out, maybe we can see some creative shit coming out, I mean it's completly freestlyed, there are no limitations this way, people can work more on their creative side, as the way you film... like angles and what not plays a big role in HG and can make a poo stunt look good.

But if most of the groups know nothing about "artisitic" filming then how the hell are they suppose to take this competition seriously?

Atleast post some criteria that tells entrants what aspects of filming, camera work and editing you're looking for.
post #16
07 May 2006, 01:05 UTC#16
QUOTE(Uncle G @ May 6 2006, 09:02 PM) [snapback]328261[/snapback]

I'd say most people would prefer tasks, if we cut it down to several dozen great tasks that allow for improvisation and innovation then it'll be much better than a random mixup with no one knowing what they're doing.


True, do what Gman and patty said.



post #17
07 May 2006, 01:06 UTC#17
Sorted then?

Just stick to the original plan, it worked good as hell in the last faceoff and most groups produced amazing footage.
post #18
07 May 2006, 01:20 UTC#18
QUOTE(Uncle G @ May 7 2006, 12:51 AM) [snapback]328254[/snapback]

Tasks are way better.

Anyone can make a mixup about anything anytime. Faceoffs where people compete against a mixup of set tasks are rarer.


Naw man, thats weak, there are tons of those.

This way there can be pranks, skits, stunts, what ever people actually have to have talent as opposed to just reading a list of tasks and doing those, thats weak.

This isn't Kareoke it's Homegrown.

It's not like a group with a shitty mix-up will win, people will be making bad ass mix ups so they can win.
post #19
07 May 2006, 01:22 UTC#19
Too much praise on mixups goes towards how well one can edit. Tasks are better, seriously.

Like I said, anyone can make a mixup. How about we do this faceoff and after set a mixup competition?
post #20
07 May 2006, 01:23 UTC#20
Stop having good ideas gman! damn..

well. lets start the face-off.. common.
post #21
07 May 2006, 01:37 UTC#21
QUOTE(Uncle G @ May 7 2006, 01:22 AM) [snapback]328275[/snapback]

Too much praise on mixups goes towards how well one can edit. Tasks are better, seriously.

Like I said, anyone can make a mixup. How about we do this faceoff and after set a mixup competition?


Dude what are you talking about? Each group making an original and bad ass Mix-Up isn't as good as some Tasks that anyone can do?

Andy one can do a face off bro, no creativity.

And I couldn't edit for shit for awhile, I still can hardly edit but people still liked our mix-ups.



Actually lets let everyone vote, honestly instead of just me Baz mako and Gman.

Lets make a poll.
post #22
07 May 2006, 01:40 UTC#22
Baz can make the final decision.

(Ignore him Baz)
post #23
07 May 2006, 01:41 UTC#23
QUOTE(Uncle G @ May 7 2006, 01:40 AM) [snapback]328286[/snapback]

Baz can make the final decision.

(Ignore him Baz)


I don't see why? A poll would let everyone decide.

(I have candy Baz).
post #24
07 May 2006, 01:43 UTC#24
QUOTE(funk master steven @ May 7 2006, 03:41 AM) [snapback]328287[/snapback]

QUOTE(Uncle G @ May 7 2006, 01:40 AM) [snapback]328286[/snapback]

Baz can make the final decision.

(Ignore him Baz)


I don't see why? A poll would let everyone decide.

(I have candy Baz).



A poll is a good idea, make one.

(I have the power to demod Baz)
post #25
07 May 2006, 01:44 UTC#25
QUOTE(Uncle G @ May 7 2006, 01:43 AM) [snapback]328288[/snapback]

QUOTE(funk master steven @ May 7 2006, 03:41 AM) [snapback]328287[/snapback]

QUOTE(Uncle G @ May 7 2006, 01:40 AM) [snapback]328286[/snapback]

Baz can make the final decision.

(Ignore him Baz)


I don't see why? A poll would let everyone decide.

(I have candy Baz).



A poll is a good idea, make one.

(I have the power to demod Baz)


Agreed

(Baz did I ever tell you how much I loved you and how much you meant to me)
post #26
07 May 2006, 01:51 UTC#26
QUOTE(funk master steven @ May 7 2006, 03:44 AM) [snapback]328289[/snapback]

QUOTE(Uncle G @ May 7 2006, 01:43 AM) [snapback]328288[/snapback]

QUOTE(funk master steven @ May 7 2006, 03:41 AM) [snapback]328287[/snapback]

QUOTE(Uncle G @ May 7 2006, 01:40 AM) [snapback]328286[/snapback]

Baz can make the final decision.

(Ignore him Baz)


I don't see why? A poll would let everyone decide.

(I have candy Baz).



A poll is a good idea, make one.

(I have the power to demod Baz)


Agreed

(Baz did I ever tell you how much I loved you and how much you meant to me)



Cool do it.

(Baz don't listen, I caught him shagging other men)
post #27
07 May 2006, 02:12 UTC#27
:D
post #28
07 May 2006, 02:23 UTC#28
*Closed*

Obviously the people of HGF prefer tasks.
post #29
07 May 2006, 03:38 UTC#29
I think this is a really cool idea, but I dont see the point in it being a substitute for the HGF Faceoff. If anything, it would be a good alternative...rather than a replacement.

Not doing the HGF Faceoff would limit the options of groups looking for a task oriented competition. The Hunt would be their only choice, and some people (who I love dearly) don't want to go down that road, seeing as Tom is too cheap to dish out the petty prizes that he promised.

Competitions suck without prizes..
post #30
07 May 2006, 10:37 UTC#30
Normally id rather see groups make an original video, but this is a face off to see who can make the best video from the same stunts. It defeats the point :)