11 April 2006, 04:29 UTC#1
Since I'm pretty sure I lost all the WS site stuff, I worked up a new layout. Obviously I'm gonna change all the text and that shit, but this gives you the general idea
External image not preserved — inspect source: http://img131.imageshack.us/img131/899/mynewsite4an.jpg11 April 2006, 04:33 UTC#2
Looks alright, but pretty basic layout. If you got some nice design so it's not the plain colours everywhere would look really nice.
11 April 2006, 04:38 UTC#3
For blogs I like simple designs

11 April 2006, 05:54 UTC#4
looks like an efukt replica
11 April 2006, 09:04 UTC#5
Nice and simple. How long until WS is up again?
11 April 2006, 09:08 UTC#6
Just looks like efukt to me
11 April 2006, 09:13 UTC#7
nice and simple
11 April 2006, 09:21 UTC#8
oh I forgot to say that where the efukt banner is....thats going to be an ad spot where banners for all my sites will go in rotation. haha thats why there is the random efukt banner.
11 April 2006, 09:54 UTC#9
the site colours and layout are all efukt, bit of a copy, or was that the look you were going for?
11 April 2006, 10:26 UTC#10
The only colors I like are black white and grey.
As for the layout, not sure what youre talking about. This is just for a personal blog man. Buttons on left, blog on right.
11 April 2006, 10:34 UTC#11
Hey, I like it, nice and simple. Dunno if your talking about the text on the Home, vids picture things.... but maybe a different font? the linking looks a little out of place in my opinion.
But yeah nice one

11 April 2006, 11:30 UTC#12
I preferred the old one, how come you wanted to change it?
11 April 2006, 11:37 UTC#13
QUOTE(neKa @ Apr 11 2006, 12:30 PM) [snapback]314971[/snapback]
I preferred the old one, how come you wanted to change it?
It was lost in the server crash

11 April 2006, 11:39 UTC#14
QUOTE(Tomm @ Apr 11 2006, 12:37 PM) [snapback]314972[/snapback]
QUOTE(neKa @ Apr 11 2006, 12:30 PM) [snapback]314971[/snapback]
I preferred the old one, how come you wanted to change it?
It was lost in the server crash

Hmmm I may have cached it, I'll have a look later.
12 April 2006, 15:42 UTC#15
I like it, quite simple.