post #121
15 April 2006, 23:23 UTC#121
the colours look wrong on it man I'll give it a 6 
Forum index / General Chat / Rate that sig thread
Rate that sig thread
429 posts · page 5 of 15
post #122
15 April 2006, 23:31 UTC#122
QUOTE(John @ Apr 16 2006, 12:23 AM) [snapback]317249[/snapback]
the colours look wrong on it man I'll give it a 6
Haha more than I would give it, I might release a who range on shit sigs
post #123
15 April 2006, 23:34 UTC#123
it aint too bad man still way better than I could do 
post #124
16 April 2006, 01:40 UTC#124
an alright idea behind it, but executed poorly, 3/10
post #125
16 April 2006, 02:02 UTC#125
5/10 - cheap publicity
post #126
16 April 2006, 02:57 UTC#126
2/10. Very ugly old men.
Can't wait to see what someone gives mine.
Can't wait to see what someone gives mine.post #127
16 April 2006, 03:06 UTC#127
1/10, not really a sig, more of a dp pic
post #128
16 April 2006, 03:17 UTC#128
7/10. I like yours.
post #129
16 April 2006, 05:55 UTC#129
2/10 too small
post #130
16 April 2006, 06:43 UTC#130
real cool photo with a shitty font added onto it.
Photo - 9/10
Actual sig 1/10
Photo - 9/10
Actual sig 1/10
post #131
16 April 2006, 08:28 UTC#131
Like other vokab designs better.
6/10
6/10
post #132
16 April 2006, 08:45 UTC#132
It all looks a bit cluttered and big. But I give it 7/10.
post #133
16 April 2006, 11:48 UTC#133
Looks like a spunk splat in a men's room.
7/10
7/10
post #134
16 April 2006, 11:53 UTC#134
QUOTE(Rob764 @ Apr 16 2006, 12:48 PM) [snapback]317497[/snapback]
Looks like a spunk splat in a men's room.
7/10
Technically shit, but geniuos at the same time 9/10
post #135
16 April 2006, 11:56 UTC#135
1.6/10
Just because I say so.
Mines old
Just because I say so.
Mines old
post #136
16 April 2006, 11:57 UTC#136
QUOTE(Skipper @ Apr 16 2006, 12:56 PM) [snapback]317501[/snapback]
1.6/10
Just because I say so.
Mines old
1.5/10
Just so you get a lower rating that me
post #137
16 April 2006, 13:51 UTC#137
8.5 coolers. Maybe he should make me a sig too.... 
post #138
16 April 2006, 19:09 UTC#138
no sig
I have a new one
I have a new one
post #139
16 April 2006, 19:10 UTC#139
QUOTE(adEm @ Apr 16 2006, 08:09 PM) [snapback]317759[/snapback]
no sig
I have a new one
I cant work out what it is but I love it
10/10
post #140
16 April 2006, 19:16 UTC#140
QUOTE(Adrian Rize @ Apr 16 2006, 02:43 AM) [snapback]317413[/snapback]
real cool photo with a shitty font added onto it.
Photo - 9/10
Actual sig 1/10
yer... go collect your welfare check fag..
post #141
16 April 2006, 21:11 UTC#141
2/10. Because you are proud of it and I wanna destroy your emotions. <3
post #142
16 April 2006, 21:51 UTC#142
QUOTE(cIRca @ Apr 16 2006, 10:11 PM) [snapback]317818[/snapback]
1/10. Because you are proud of it and I wanna destroy your emotions. <3
post #143
22 April 2006, 19:01 UTC#143
Chorus, I like your signature design. Nice color composition and overall appearance.
9/10 Points
Good work!
9/10 Points
Good work!
post #144
22 April 2006, 19:04 UTC#144
dont have a clue what the fuck its meant to be but I'll give it a 4
post #145
22 April 2006, 19:04 UTC#145
5/10
simple, but small
simple, but small
post #146
22 April 2006, 20:18 UTC#146
Just a sig I use on another site, for others to see what I do on the team 
lol, that's a bad dick, man!
7/10
lol, that's a bad dick, man!
7/10
post #147
22 April 2006, 20:54 UTC#147
I am lost with this one...
4/10?
4/10?
post #148
22 April 2006, 20:56 UTC#148
Quote: 10
Sig: 8
Average: 9
Sig: 8
Average: 9
post #149
22 April 2006, 20:57 UTC#149
I like it, 7/10
post #150
22 April 2006, 22:19 UTC#150
10/10
hahaha
hahaha